罗尔斯公民不服从理论研究

发布时间：2018-02-23 12:52

本文关键词： 罗尔斯公民不服从正义法律　出处：《辽宁大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“公民不服从”理论的研究源于西方,二十世纪六十年代末到七十年代初这一研究达到了高潮,而当代有关于“公民不服从”理论研究,应该首推罗尔斯在其名著《正义论》中的阐释。本文主要研究的是罗尔斯的“公民不服从”理论,主要介绍了罗尔斯公民不服从理论的学理脉络、正义论视角、内容、证明以及公民不服从与良心拒绝的区别,并且在此基础上深入地分析了罗尔斯这一理论的合理性和局限性。罗尔斯假定“公民不服从”在接近正义的民主制度中存在侵犯正义的两个原则的法律或者制度,并且在忠于法律的范围内进行的。这一理论有利于纠正社会的不正义加强维护社会的正义制度的作用,同时它还有助于改善法律制度,促进公民自由和权力的实现;我们还应该看到它的局限性,罗尔斯在论证上存在逻辑缺陷而且由于罗尔斯假定在一个接近正义的社会中来讨论这一理论的,并且他还强调这一理论应该符合正义的法律,所以一旦将这一理论付诸实践就会遇到很多困难。
[Abstract]:The research on the theory of "citizen disobedience" originated in the West, and reached its climax from the end of 1960s to the beginning of 70s. The explanation of Rawls in his famous book, the Theory of Justice, should be put forward first. This paper mainly studies Rawls' theory of "citizen disobedience", mainly introduces the theoretical context of Rawls' civil disobedience theory, the angle of view of justice, the content, the proof and the difference between citizen disobedience and conscientious objection. On this basis, the rationality and limitation of Rawls' theory are deeply analyzed. Rawls assumes that there are two laws or systems that violate the two principles of justice in a democratic system close to justice. This theory is helpful to correct social injustice and strengthen the function of safeguarding social justice system. At the same time, it also helps to improve the legal system and promote the realization of civil liberties and power. We should also see its limitations, Rawls has logical flaws in his argument and because Rawls assumes to discuss this theory in a society close to justice, and he also stresses that it should conform to the law of justice. So once this theory is put into practice, there will be many difficulties.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D097.12

【参考文献】