论政治社会的共享目的——以罗尔斯为视角

发布时间：2018-02-28 21:14

本文关键词： 政治社会实践联合体政治正义共享目的政治认同　出处：《伦理学研究》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：罗尔斯一方面恪守自由主义的中立原则,另一方面又拒斥霍布斯式的"私人社会",认为良序社会的正义原则及相应的制度是一种内在善,是公民应为之奋斗的共享的终极目的,两者形成了紧张关系。为了解释其张力,罗尔斯援引奥克肖特关于事业联合体和公民联合体的区分指出,有着共享目的的政治社会不同于严格意义上的共同体,而只是实践联合体(公民联合体),它相容于中立原则。但事实上,对于罗尔斯而言,中立原则和共享目的的和解依赖于更深层次的共享——对自由及其相关价值的共享。正是奠基于这两个层次的共享目的,政治认同得以确立,"稳定性论证"才得以完成。
[Abstract]:On the one hand, Rawls adhered to the principle of neutrality of liberalism; on the other hand, he rejected the Hobbesian "private society". He believed that the principle of justice and the corresponding system in a well-ordered society was an inherent good and the ultimate goal for which citizens should strive to share. In order to explain the tension, Rawls cited Oakchott's distinction between a business union and a civic union, pointing out that a political society with a shared purpose was different from a community in the strict sense of the word. It's just a community of practice, which is compatible with the principle of neutrality. But in fact, for Rawls, The settlement of the principle of neutrality and the purpose of sharing depends on the deeper sharing-the sharing of freedom and its related values. It is on the basis of these two levels of shared purpose that political identity is established and "stability argument" is completed.
【作者单位】：湖南师范大学道德文化研究中心暨哲学系;中国特色社会主义道德文化协同创新中心、湖南师范大学共享思想研究中心;
【基金】：湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目“政治认同视域下的爱国美德研究”(17B177) 湖南师范大学共享思想研究中心项目“政治社会的共享目的”(17GX04)
【分类号】：D091

【相似文献】