关于政治文化研究“复兴”的争议

发布时间：2018-03-03 10:33

本文选题：政治文化　切入点：政治文化复兴　出处：《教学与研究》2013年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：政治文化研究在经历了一段时间的沉寂之后,从20世纪80年代末期开始出现转机,西方一些政治文化研究学者陆续提出了"政治文化复兴"的说法。而持反对观点的学者认为,政治文化研究在定义、问卷设计、变量分析、理论适用性和方法论等方面存在诸多问题,"政治文化复兴"注定要失败。但这些批评并未影响政治文化研究的复兴,自20世纪80年代末期开始出现的大量政治文化研究著作表明,政治文化研究重新回到了政治分析的中心舞台。复兴后的政治文化研究是对20世纪50—60年代政治文化研究的再生、重释和再创造。
[Abstract]:After a period of silence in the study of political culture, since the end of 1980s, there has been a turn for the better. Some western scholars of political and cultural studies have put forward the idea of "political and cultural revival" one after another. There are many problems in the study of political culture, such as definition, questionnaire design, variable analysis, theory applicability and methodology, etc. "political culture revival" is doomed to failure, but these criticisms do not affect the revival of political culture research. Since the end of 1980s, a large number of books on political and cultural studies have shown that the study of political culture has returned to the central stage of political analysis, and that the study of political culture after its revival is a rebirth of the study of political culture in the 1950s and 1960s in 20th century. Re-release and re-creation.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“西方政治文化研究复兴新成果跟踪研究”(项目号:11BZZ011)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D089

【参考文献】