国家治理中的派系问题研究——一个西方政治思想史的简述

发布时间：2018-03-05 19:02

本文选题：国家派系　切入点：公共利益　出处：《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：国家治理的一个根本目的是追求稳定,然而,无原则的派系乱斗从古至今一直是困扰国家治理的一个顽疾。从古希腊、古罗马到中世纪的城市共和国,再到近代民主的产生与发展,无不闪现着派系的身影及其对政治秩序的冲击和破坏。派系问题由此激起了不同时代政治思想家的思考,人们就派系的危害、表现形式、产生原因以及抑制方式等提出不同的看法,并认为对公共利益的背离与危害是判定派系行为的根本标准。从政治思想史来看,休谟和伯克对派系问题的思考成为一个转折,休谟不但对派系进行了类型学的分析,而且注意到了派系的现代形式,伯克则从规范的意义上首次对派系与政党作出了有效的区分,从而为现代国家治理中政党政治的出现提供了一种合理的理由。
[Abstract]:One of the fundamental purposes of state governance is the pursuit of stability. However, unprincipled factional strife has been a persistent disease of state governance from ancient times, from ancient Greece to ancient Rome to medieval urban republics. Then to the emergence and development of modern democracy, the figure of factions and their impact on and destruction of political order flashed. Thus, the issue of factions aroused the thinking of political thinkers of different times, and people were concerned about the harm and manifestations of factions. Different views are put forward on the causes and ways of inhibition, and it is believed that deviation and harm to the public interest are the basic criteria for judging the behavior of factions. From the history of political thought, Hume and Burke's thinking on factional issues has become a turning point. Hume not only made a typological analysis of factions, but also paid attention to the modern forms of factions. Burke, for the first time, made an effective distinction between factions and political parties in the sense of norms. This provides a reasonable reason for the emergence of party politics in modern state governance.
【作者单位】：南京大学政府管理学院;西北大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金(07BZZ007)
【分类号】：D091

【共引文献】