张东荪与张君劢个人权利观比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-07 11:38

本文选题：张东荪　切入点：张君劢　出处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：与20世纪上半叶绝大多数中国自由知识分子一样,张东荪与张君劢经历了先浸淫于儒学、又沐浴欧风美雨、后持自由之思描绘救国蓝图的学术发展历程。在谋求独立富强的语境下,张东荪与张君劢以个人权利为核心,通过平衡个人权利与公权力之间的关系,建构了各自的政治哲学思想体系。张东荪由"知识即价值"出发,在现存社会关系里探索人的本质及其实现;张君劢坚持"法律至上",于宪政框架内谋划人本的内涵及获得。张东荪选择公权力和文化上的自由主义共筑人本大厦,张君劢把现实的人交给了民国法统。逻辑起点和结论上的差异,导致二人由亲密无间的朋友变成分属敌对阵营的陌路人。虽然张东荪与张君劢关于"以什么人为本、以人的什么为本、谁以人为本"的讨论已成为过去,但是他们留给后人一个深刻的问题,谋求国家强盛的终极关怀是单纯的公权力日益壮大还是人的全面发展。
[Abstract]:Like the vast majority of Chinese liberal intellectuals in 20th century, Zhang Dongsun and Zhang Junmai experienced first immersion in Confucianism, and then bathed in the European wind and rain. In the context of seeking independence and prosperity, Zhang Dongsun and Zhang Junmai take individual rights as the core and balance the relationship between individual rights and public power. Zhang Dongsun explores the essence and realization of human beings in the existing social relations from the perspective of "knowledge is value". Zhang Junmai insisted on the supremacy of law and planned the connotation and acquisition of humanism within the framework of constitutionalism. Zhang Dongsun chose public power and cultural liberalism to build a people-oriented edifice. Zhang Junmai handed over the realistic people to the Republic of China's legal unification. The differences between the logical starting points and the conclusions led the two people to change from close friends to strangers belonging to hostile camps. Although Zhang Dongsun and Zhang Junmai talked about "who is the foundation," The discussion of "who should take the people as the basis" has become a thing of the past, but they have left behind a profound problem. The ultimate concern for the prosperity of our country is whether the simple public power is growing day by day or the all-round development of human beings.
【作者单位】：长春工业大学人文学院;吉林大学第二医院;
【分类号】：D092

【共引文献】