“宏观”集体行动理论视野下的跨界流域合作——以漳河为个案

发布时间：2018-03-08 05:33

本文选题：流域治理　切入点：地方政府合作　出处：《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新政治经济学将流域治理看作是一个集体行动问题,流域集体行动研究最为典型的是以奥斯特罗姆夫妇为代表的印第安纳学派,该学派倡导多中心的治理模式。我国目前尚未完全建立统一的流域行政,流域管理职责散落在流域所流经的各地政府手中,是一种"碎片化"式的单中心行政。近年来我国跨界水问题频发,这引发了对于既有流域治理机制进行变革的呼声。从晋冀豫漳河的案例分析可以看出,跨界流域治理的困境并非仅仅由于流域地方政府间缺少合作机制,更大的问题在于既有合作的低效。改革需要明确流域资源的"共有产权",赋予流域管理机构监督和惩罚流域地方政府的权力,并积极推动参与式流域管理。
[Abstract]:The new political economy regards watershed governance as a collective action problem. The most typical study of watershed collective action is the Indiana School, represented by the Ostroms. The school advocated a multi-center governance model. At present, China has not completely established a unified watershed administration, watershed management responsibilities are scattered in the river basin flowing through the local governments. It is a kind of "fragmented" single-center administration. In recent years, there have been frequent cross-border water problems in China, which has triggered calls for reform of the existing watershed governance mechanism. From the case study of the Shanxi-Hebei-Henan River, we can see that, The dilemma of transboundary watershed governance is not simply due to the lack of mechanisms for cooperation between local governments in the basin, The greater problem lies in the inefficiency of the existing cooperation. The reform needs to define the "common property rights" of watershed resources, endow the watershed management agencies with the power to supervise and punish the local government of the basin, and actively promote participatory watershed management.
【作者单位】：南开大学周恩来政府管理学院政治学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(11CZZ013);国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD017)
【分类号】：D091

【参考文献】