从弗里德里克到登哈特：行政责任观的演变及其启示

发布时间：2018-03-14 02:08

本文选题：行政责任　切入点：新公共管理运动　出处：《湖南师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：从威尔逊公开发表《行政学研究》以后,从行政管理被作为一门独立学科提上学术高度以来,行政责任理论的发展一直伴随着行政管理学科的发展正在慢慢演变。本文的写作也是针对这样的发展进程进行研究,主要对西方思想史中的从卡尔·弗里德里克到罗伯特·登哈特的这段时期里的行政责任理论进行历史性的探究。从卡尔·弗里德里克到罗伯特·登哈特的这段时期经历了传统公共行政理论的衰败时期,新公共管理理论从萌芽到兴盛时期,以及新公共管理理论逐渐显露缺陷试图寻求新的替代模式的时期。因此也可以说这段时期的行政责任理论的演变就是新公共管理运动发展的一个缩影。本文对这段时期的行政责任观的研究的目的,是从对本文所讨论的几位学者的行政责任观中探析出责任的理论本质,以及它的基本价值诉求,以及对行政管理发展具有的借鉴意义。全文按照时间的推移和理论探讨的进展展开,通过以各个理论观点产生的理论背景和基础为研究依托,伴随着对国内外研究思想的历史演变的探析,深刻的剖析各个理论观点本身的特点,并对各个理论观点进行全面的评价。本文首先介绍卡尔·弗里德里克与赫尔曼·芬纳那一场具有历史性里程碑意义的责任问题的争论。在这场争论中弗里德里克先抛出自己的观点,展现了对主观责任控制的偏好,芬纳随即针对弗里德里克的观点拿出自己的理由进行反驳。在两人之间通过文章你来我往的这样一种争论中,我们发现他们探讨的一个根本性的问题就是主客观责任控制孰轻孰重的问题。接下来,本文针对这一问题被具体抛出后各个学者的反应,渐进式的结构性的探究三个具有代表性的观点。这三个观点都是努力的想在行政责任客观本性和主观本性之间寻得一个平衡：马歇尔·迪莫克的主客观责任控制平衡；特里·库珀尝试着将伦理道德作为两者之间的平衡点；而巴巴拉·罗姆泽克则干脆根据责任内在的外在的以及呈现的个人自主性高低的特征分类出四种责任。随着平衡的难以求得,责任的复杂性可见一斑,本文在此基础上转而探讨登哈特提出的责任并不简单的责任复杂性观点,从理论基础到对以往行政责任观的反思,再到登哈特责任复杂性的理论内在具体责任观的构建,展现了登哈特的在新公共服务指导下的行政责任观是行政管理理论发展到现在的产物,顺应着时代需要的发展。最后,通过对这段特殊时期的行政责任理论的探讨研究,对这样一个思想发展的过进行客观的分析,挖掘出实际的演变内涵,基本的价值诉求,值得借鉴的创新之处。
[Abstract]:Since the publication of "Administrative Studies" by Wilson, and since the administration has been raised to the academic level as an independent discipline, The development of the theory of administrative responsibility has been accompanied by the development of the subject of administration is slowly evolving. The historical exploration of the theory of administrative responsibility from Karl Friedrich to Robert Denhardt in the history of Western thought. The period from Carl Friedrich to Robert Denhardt went through a period of decline in the traditional theory of public administration, and the theory of new public management went from the bud to the boom. Therefore, the evolution of the theory of administrative responsibility in this period is a microcosm of the development of the movement of new public management. The purpose of the research on the concept of administrative responsibility in a period of time, It is from several scholars' view of administrative responsibility discussed in this paper to analyze the theoretical essence of responsibility and its basic value demand. According to the passage of time and the progress of theoretical discussion, the thesis is based on the theoretical background and foundation of various theoretical viewpoints. With the analysis of the historical evolution of domestic and foreign research ideas, the characteristics of each theoretical point of view are deeply analyzed, and the comprehensive evaluation of each theoretical point of view. This article begins with a historical landmark debate on responsibility between Carl Friedrich and Helmand Finner, in which Friedrich first throws out his point of view. Showing a preference for subjective control of responsibility, Finner then rebutted his arguments against Frederick's point of view. In such an argument between the two men, We find that one of the fundamental issues they are discussing is the question of which is the priority of subjective and objective responsibility control. Next, this paper deals with the reaction of various scholars after this question has been concretely thrown out. The gradual structural exploration of three representative points of view is an effort to strike a balance between the objective nature of administrative responsibility and the subjective nature: the balance of subjective and objective responsibility control by Matthew Dimoch; Terry Cooper is trying to balance ethics with ethics; Barbara Romzek categorizes four kinds of responsibilities simply according to the internal and external characteristics of responsibility and the level of personal autonomy that is present, and as the balance becomes difficult to achieve, the complexity of the responsibility is evident. On this basis, this paper discusses the complexity of responsibility put forward by Denhart, from the theoretical basis to the reflection of the previous concept of administrative responsibility, and then to the construction of the theory of the complexity of the responsibility of Denhart. It shows that Denhart's concept of administrative responsibility under the guidance of the new public service is the product of the development of administrative management theory to the present and conforms to the needs of the times. Finally, through the study of the theory of administrative responsibility in this special period, Through the objective analysis of the development of such a thought, the author excavates the connotation of the actual evolution, the basic value demand, and the innovation worthy of reference.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D035

【参考文献】