新古典现实主义与结构现实主义的局限性探讨——评《新古典现实主义国际政治理论》

发布时间：2018-03-18 14:13

本文选题：现实主义　切入点：国际政治理论　出处：《江西社会科学》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正自20世纪90年代起,国际关系现实主义理论学派内部产生分化,在古典现实主义、结构现实主义等流派的基础上又衍生出新古典现实主义,它是在国际关系当中明确走向对外政策理论建构路径的一种新分析方法。由于近年来对新古典现实主义的误解与质疑层出不穷,诺林·里普斯曼、斯蒂芬·洛贝尔和杰弗里·托利弗合著了《新古典现实主义国际政治理论》(上海人民出版社2017年版)一书,试图澄清新古典现实主义理论的核心概念、基本要素和内在逻辑,对新古典现实主
[Abstract]:Since 1990s, there has been a division within the school of international relations realism, and on the basis of classical realism, structural realism and other schools, neo-classical realism has emerged. It is a new analytical method that clearly moves towards the path of foreign policy theory construction in international relations. Because of the misunderstanding and questioning of neo-classical realism in recent years, Norm Rippsman, Stephen Lobell and Jeffrey Tolliver co-authored the New Classical realism Theory of International Politics (Shanghai people's Publishing House, 2017), which attempts to clarify the core concepts, basic elements and internal logic of the neo-classical realism theory. On the subject of Neoclassical reality
【作者单位】：中共福建省委党校;
【分类号】：D0-5

【相似文献】