中国研究何以被边缘化——基于比较政治学的分析视角

发布时间：2018-03-22 03:30

  本文选题：中国研究　切入点：比较政治学　出处：《国外社会科学》2014年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当代中国政治研究最具影响力的著作为什么没有对比较政治学产生显著影响?本文通过对42份比较政治学课程教学大纲的定量分析指出:首先,由于有关中国学研究成果大多倾向于发表在区域研究刊物上,导致这些成果与其他学科领域相隔绝;其次,这些研究仅围绕以中国政治为唯一导向的话题展开,失去了广阔的比较视角的潜力;最后,西方比较政治学似乎已陷入所谓的"民主棱镜"(democratic prism)之中,使得比较政治学研究在方法和概念层面存在既定框架,进而影响相关研究者,导致这一领域的学者难以适应有关中国崛起、发展及与之相伴的改变学科传统观念的争论,并限制了学者对比较政治学核心议题的理解。
[Abstract]:Why did the most influential works in contemporary Chinese political studies not have a significant impact on comparative politics? Based on the quantitative analysis of 42 syllabuses of comparative political science, this paper points out that, first of all, most of the research results of Chinese studies tend to be published in regional research journals, which leads to the separation of these achievements from other disciplines. These studies have only focused on the topic of Chinese politics as the sole guide, and have lost the potential for a broad comparative perspective. Finally, comparative politics in the West seems to have fallen into the so-called "democratic prism" of democracy. It makes the comparative political science research have an established framework in terms of methodology and concept, and then influence the relevant researchers, which makes it difficult for scholars in this field to adapt to the debate about the rise and development of China and the accompanying changes in the traditional concept of the discipline. It also limits scholars' understanding of the core issues of comparative politics.
【作者单位】： 加拿大蒙特利尔大学;北京大学政府管理学院;
【分类号】：D0
，

本文编号：1646888