制度、发展阶段与发展绩效——兼评阿西莫格鲁等人的制度理论

发布时间：2018-03-24 12:57

本文选题：经济发展　切入点：制度　出处：《现代经济探讨》2017年12期

【摘要】：通过将制度两分为"包容型制度"和"掠夺型制度",阿西莫格鲁等人秉承诺斯的制度决定论思想,强调如果在历史的关键节点由于某个"重要事件"建立了包容型制度,国家将就此走向繁荣;而中国由于没有引入西方民主建立包容型政治制度,快速增长并不能持续。基于阿西莫格鲁等人使用的数据,通过对他们关于原殖民地发展差异原因的理论解释和实证分析过程深入分析,发现其理论假说存在逻辑缺陷,实证分析也可能存在样本选择问题,关于制度是殖民地发展差异主要原因的实证结论并不稳健。据此,提出了制度变革要以制度从经济增长的促进因素转变为阻碍因素为前提,适应生产力不同发展阶段的制度才是最优的观点。
[Abstract]:By dividing systems into "inclusive systems" and "plundering systems", Asimoglu and others, following North's institutional determinism, emphasize that if an inclusive system is established at a key point in history due to a "major event", The country will prosper in this way, and China's rapid growth is not sustainable because it has not introduced Western democracy to build inclusive political systems, based on data used by Asimoglu and others. Through the deep analysis of their theoretical explanation and empirical analysis of the reasons for the differences in the development of the original colonies, it is found that the theoretical hypothesis has logical defects, and the empirical analysis may also have the problem of sample selection. The empirical conclusion that institution is the main cause of the difference in colonial development is not sound. Based on this, the paper puts forward that institutional reform should be based on the transformation of institution from a factor of promoting economic growth to a factor of hindrance. The system adapting to different stages of development of productive forces is the best view.
【作者单位】：盐城工学院经济学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“我国经济增长潜力和动力研究”(项目编号:14ZDA023)
【分类号】：D066

【相似文献】