自由多元文化主义假说的检视:规范理论和社会科学的证据

发布时间：2018-04-09 07:54

本文选题：多元文化主义　切入点：社会科学学者　出处：《世界民族》2013年03期

【摘要】：在20世纪90年代的大部分时间里,多元文化主义的研究主要是规范性(normative)研究,其主导者是一些政治哲学方面的学者,他们提出了一种明确的有关多元文化公民的自由-民主形式的理想学说。这个自由多元文化主义的假说(认为多元文化主义政策并不妨碍核心的自由民主价值观)一直影响很大,它不仅在(政治)哲学领域,而且在更广泛的学术界,事实上也在公众生活领域,为多元文化主义的争论定了基调。然而,许多社会科学学者质疑,多元文化主义在现实世界中是否良善有益。本文考察了已有的证据,从加拿大和跨国层面,实证性地检视了自由多元文化主义的假说。关于自由民主多元文化主义的前景和多元文化政策对自由民主价值观的影响,这些证据能告诉我们什么呢?
[Abstract]:For most of the 1990s, the study of multiculturalism was dominated by scholars in the field of political philosophy.They put forward a clear ideal doctrine of liberal-democratic forms for multicultural citizens.This hypothesis of liberal multiculturalism (that the policy of multiculturalism does not interfere with the core values of liberal democracy) has always been influential, not only in the field of philosophy, but also in the wider academic world.Indeed, in the field of public life, the debate over multiculturalism has set the tone.However, many social scientists question whether multiculturalism is good in the real world.This paper examines the existing evidence and empirically examines the hypothesis of liberal multiculturalism from the Canadian and transnational perspectives.What does this evidence tell us about the prospects of liberal democratic multiculturalism and the impact of multicultural policies on liberal democratic values?
【作者单位】：加拿大女王大学;中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所;
【分类号】：C95

【相似文献】