民主的智慧:一种旨在达成集体判断的亚里士多德式中道

发布时间：2018-04-12 18:22

  本文选题：认知性民主 + 公共决策模式　； 参考：《甘肃行政学院学报》2014年04期

【摘要】：在理性认知的民主政体中,一种令人满意的决策模式必须借助对于相关知识的考量,达到既尊重民主价值又增进公民利益的目标。通过对亚里士多德著作某些篇章和古代雅典立法过程的分析,一种处于独立意志的集聚与协商之间的"中道"呈现出来:它提供了令人满意的集体判断模式的决策的认知途径,而且其既有时效性,又可内源性地设置议程。相关专业知识的聚合(REA)模型通过聚合跨领域的专业知识,可使一群具备最基本能力的选民在关乎公共利益的问题上,于多个选项间进行择优选择。与标准的孔多塞陪审团不同,REA基于对专家的声誉和主张的判断,将协商与投票两种方式结合起来。
[Abstract]:In a rational perceived democracy, a satisfactory decision-making model must be based on the consideration of relevant knowledge to achieve the goal of respecting the value of democracy and promoting the interests of citizens.Through the analysis of some chapters of Aristotle's works and the legislative process of ancient Athens, a kind of "middle way" between the agglomeration of independent will and the negotiation is presented: it provides a cognitive way for the decision-making of satisfactory collective judgment model.And its both timeliness, but also endogenous setting of the agenda.By aggregating cross-domain expertise, a group of voters with the most basic abilities can choose among several options on issues related to the public interest.Unlike the standard Condoleezza jury, the REA combines negotiation with voting based on its judgment of the reputation and claims of experts.
【作者单位】： 斯坦福大学政治学系;曲阜师范大学日照校区政治与公共管理学院;中共中央党校政法部;
【基金】：2010年国家重大招标课题“当代中国公民思想道德素质与中国社会文明程度研究”(编号:10&ZD049)的子课题“政治文明与当代中国社会文明发展程度”
【分类号】：D082
，

本文编号：1740895