国家失效的逻辑——基于苏联—俄罗斯第一共和国案例的分析

发布时间：2018-05-04 17:22

本文选题：国家失效 + 国家力量　；参考：《江苏行政学院学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：冷战结束后,国内外学者开始了对国家失效问题的研究。但包括世界银行在内的专家学者研究多集中在国家提供公共物品和公共服务的无效方面,至于国家失效背后的原因,则多语焉不详。现代国家的本质特点在于形成了具有权威的强制性组织,因此其成功和失效与国家的组织力量的强弱有着密切的联系。过于广泛的国家职能和弱小的国家力量之间的失衡以及国家制度力量和非制度力量的此消彼长,极大地影响着国家统治和治理效能。苏联和俄罗斯联邦第一共和国时期两次不同形式的国家失效表明,当代表国家正式制度的国家力量不仅无法有效地统治社会中与正式制度背道而驰的势力时,就需要争取和借助后者的力量,而这种“国家制度力量”与“国家非制度力量”之间的对抗和妥协,以及国家根本权力持有者的政治失控,正是造成国家力量削弱乃至国家失效的直接原因。
[Abstract]:After the Cold War, scholars at home and abroad began to study the problem of national failure. But experts and scholars, including the World Bank, have focused on the ineffectiveness of public goods and services provided by the state. The essential characteristic of modern country is that it has formed an authoritative compulsory organization, so its success and failure are closely related to the strength of national organization. The imbalance between too wide state function and weak state power and the rise and fall of national institutional power and non-institutional power greatly affect the effectiveness of state governance and governance. Two different forms of State failure during the period of the Soviet Union and the first Republic of the Russian Federation show that when the forces representing the formal system of the State are not only unable to effectively rule forces in society that run counter to the formal system, There is a need to win over and draw upon the latter, the confrontation and compromise between the "national institutional power" and the "non-institutional power of the State", and the political runaway of the fundamental power holders of the State, It is the direct cause of the weakening and even the failure of the state.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学国际关系学院;
【分类号】：D03

【相似文献】