建构制度主义:起源、特点及应用

发布时间：2018-05-08 07:21

  本文选题：制度主义 + 海伊　； 参考：《上海行政学院学报》2017年01期

【摘要】：本文原题为"Constructivist Institutionalism",选自罗德斯(R.A.W.Rhodes)、宾德(Sarah A.Binder)与罗克曼(Bert A.Rockman)主编的《牛津政治制度手册》(The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions,The Oxford University Press,2006)第四章。科林·海伊(Colin Hay)教授在英国伯明翰大学与美国麻省理工大学同时供职的学术经历,使他能够深入思考美国政治科学领域的新制度主义路径的优势和局限,以及该路径能否同英国及欧洲社会科学主流传统相适应的问题。早在1998年,针对霍尔(Peter Hall)与泰勒(Rosemary Taylor)以学科背景及研究领域为依据来划分新制度主义政治学三大流派的做法,海伊在英国《政治研究》(Political Studies)杂志上指出理性选择制度主义、社会学制度主义、历史制度主义在社会本体性基础上不仅无法共享相互兼容的理论假设,而且不同程度上均存在剥夺制度当中行动者的能动性并使制度分析移向结构主义一侧的倾向。2006年,海伊教授在为《牛津政治制度手册》撰写的本文中,较为全面地概括了理性选择制度主义、社会学制度主义、历史制度主义在关注制度生成而忽视其随后发展方面的共同偏好,指出建构制度主义由于本体性、分析性及方法性上的独特属性,其有能力向现有新制度主义各流派发起挑战。建构制度主义作为一种更富动态色彩并兼具历史性与建构论的制度主义路径,虽然尚处于初创阶段,却已经成为新制度主义政治学的第四个流派,在阐释复杂制度的演化、适应和创新方面展示了出色能力。
[Abstract]:This paper is originally entitled "Constructivist Institutionalism", selected from chapter 4 of the Oxford Handbook of political institutions, "the Oxford Handbook of Political institutions" and "the Oxford University Press / 2006", edited by Rhodes, R.A. W. Rhodesman, Binder and Bert A. Rockman. Professor Colin Hayin's academic experience at the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom at the same time as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States enables him to think deeply about the advantages and limitations of the new institutionalism path in the field of political science in the United States. And whether the path can adapt to the mainstream traditions of the British and European social sciences. As early as 1998, in response to the approach of Peter Halland Taylor Rosemary Taylori in dividing the three major schools of neo-institutionalism politics on the basis of academic background and field of study, Hayy pointed out in the British Journal of political Studies that rational institutionalism is the principle of rational choice. Sociological institutionalism, historical institutionalism, on the basis of social Noumenon, is not only unable to share mutually compatible theoretical hypotheses, Moreover, there is a tendency to deprive the actors of the system and to shift the institutional analysis to the structuralist side. In 2006, Professor Hayy wrote this article for the Oxford political system Manual. This paper comprehensively summarizes the common preferences of rational choice institutionalism, sociological institutionalism and historical institutionalism in paying attention to the formation of institution and neglecting its subsequent development, and points out that constructivism is due to its ontological nature. Its unique analytical and methodological attributes are capable of challenging existing schools of neo-institutionalism. As a more dynamic and historical and constructivism path, constructivism, although still in its infancy, has become the fourth school of new institutionalism politics, explaining the evolution of complex institutions. Excellent adaptability and innovation have been demonstrated.
【作者单位】： 英国伯明翰大学政治与国际研究系;吉林大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“当代新制度主义政治学理论建构研究”(14CZZ036)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D0
，

本文编号：1860479