幻象与现实之间的联邦制——对联邦制研究中若干重要问题的讨论

发布时间：2018-06-06 04:06

本文选题：分权 + 联邦制　；参考：《政治学研究》2014年01期

【摘要】：在联邦制研究领域,研究者常常胶着于规范思考与经验研究之间,甚至以规范性假设取代经验分析和思考,进而又以对制度的乐观想象替代对制度及其实践的现实关注,从而在一定程度上模糊了观念与现实之间的差异,并使人们对于联邦制的理解充满歧义。本文采取应然与实然相区别的分析路径,尝试在联邦制研究的若干重要问题领域厘清相关认识,以期在获得有关联邦制的较为平衡而全面的认识的同时,更新有关较为具体层面的公共政策和国家治理的一般思考,即联邦制具有重要的和不可替代的制度功能,但它绝非万能;分权作为一种重要的国家治理策略,既非联邦制国家独有,更不是国家治理的目标本身。应然维度上有关联邦制的思考赋予人们开阔的思考空间,而实然维度上对联邦制的观察和分析,则有助于无论是联邦制国家还是单一制国家作出务实而理性的制度与政策选择以及更为广泛意义上的改革路径的选择。
[Abstract]:In the field of federalism research, researchers often cling to the relationship between normative thinking and empirical research, and even replace empirical analysis and thinking with normative assumptions, and then substitute optimistic imagination for institution and its practical concern. To some extent, it blurs the difference between ideas and reality, and makes people's understanding of federalism full of ambiguity. This paper attempts to clarify the relevant knowledge in several important problems in the study of federalism in order to obtain a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of federalism at the same time. Updating the general thinking on more specific levels of public policy and national governance, namely, that federalism has important and irreplaceable institutional functions, but it is by no means omnipotent; decentralization is an important national governance strategy, Neither a federal state is unique, nor is the goal of national governance itself. The thinking about federalism in the ought dimension gives people broad thinking space, while the observation and analysis of the federalism in the real dimension, It is helpful for both federal and unitary countries to make pragmatic and rational system and policy choices as well as the choice of reform path in a wider sense.
【作者单位】：北京大学政府管理学院;
【基金】：2011年教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0015)联邦制研究项目的研究成果
【分类号】：D034

【共引文献】