是否皆为利己——制度转型深入期企业家政治联系的双重角色

发布时间：2018-06-06 18:38

  本文选题：政治联系 + 工具行为　； 参考：《南开管理评论》2017年04期

【摘要】：企业家对于政治联系的使用是否纯粹出于利己?对该问题的探讨有助于与当前理论中"转型深入期政治联系是否依然具有战略价值"的争论对话。本文研究中国转型经济背景下企业家对于政治联系的使用,提出了工具性和亲社会性两种机制的双重角色模型,利用江苏、安徽等363家企业的问卷调研数据,采用第一阶段有调节的中介效应模型进行实证检验。研究结果表明,中国企业家政治联系的使用并非纯粹是利己,还有利他效应。研究企业家政治联系背景下的"阴暗面"与"明亮面"这两种机制都很重要。完善的制度环境可以消除企业的投机现象,但市场的激烈竞争并未使企业仅仅变成自私自利的"怪兽"。此外,考虑到制度、市场、企业三个层面的情境效应,这两种行为机制存在结构差异与内容差异。在三种情境下,政治联系的工具行为机制对于制度环境变化最为敏感,相比而言,亲社会行为机制对于市场不确定性变化更为敏感。这进一步证实,制度转型并非直线式进行,新时期政治联系依然具有战略价值。
[Abstract]:Are entrepreneurs' use of political connections purely self-interested? The discussion on this issue is helpful to the debate about whether the political connection in the period of transition is still of strategic value. This paper studies the use of political connections by entrepreneurs in the context of China's transition economy, puts forward a dual role model of instrumental and pro-social mechanisms, and makes use of the survey data of 363 enterprises in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces. The first stage mediated effect model is used for empirical test. The results show that the use of political connections of Chinese entrepreneurs is not purely egoism, but altruism. It is important to study the dark side and bright side in the context of entrepreneur political connection. The perfect institutional environment can eliminate the phenomenon of enterprise speculation, but the fierce competition in the market does not make the enterprise become a selfish monster. In addition, considering the situational effects of institutional, market and enterprise levels, there are structural differences and content differences between the two behavioral mechanisms. In the three situations, the instrumental behavior mechanism of political connection is the most sensitive to the change of institutional environment, while the pro-social behavior mechanism is more sensitive to the change of market uncertainty. This further confirmed that the institutional transformation is not straight-line, the new period of political ties still have strategic value.
【作者单位】： 南京大学商学院;南京邮电大学理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(71272110、71572078)资助
【分类号】：D0;F272.91
，

本文编号：1987727