保守主义是如何批判自由主义的——以斯特劳斯学派大师布鲁姆为例

发布时间：2018-06-21 03:36

本文选题：政治哲学 + 保守主义　；参考：《人民论坛·学术前沿》2014年15期

【摘要】：在当代西方政治哲学中,自由主义与保守主义是对立的派别。如果说当代自由主义的代表是罗尔斯,那么当代保守主义的代表就是布鲁姆。布鲁姆对罗尔斯的批判典型地体现了保守主义的自由主义批判,而这种批判是通过如下四个方面的对立表现出来的:首先是自然状态对原初状态,其次是优越对平等,再次是合理性对理性,最后是等级制对民主制。通过对这些批判的深入分析,我们认为保守主义的自由主义批判与其说是揭示了自由主义的缺点,不如说是暴露了保守主义自身的问题。
[Abstract]:In contemporary western political philosophy, liberalism and conservatism are opposite factions. If the representative of contemporary liberalism is Rawls, then the representative of contemporary conservatism is Bloom. Bloom's critique of Rawls typically reflects the liberal criticism of conservatism, and this criticism is manifested through the opposition of the following four aspects: first, the natural state versus the original state, and secondly, the superiority versus equality. The third is rationality versus reason, and finally, hierarchy versus democracy. Through the in-depth analysis of these criticisms, we think that the liberalism criticism of conservatism not only reveals the shortcomings of liberalism, but also exposes the problems of conservatism itself.
【作者单位】：吉林大学哲学社会学院哲学系;
【基金】：教育部重点研究基地重大项目“分配正义研究”的支持,项目批准号为12JJD710011
【分类号】：D091

【相似文献】