沃格林的“政治科学”：新与旧
发布时间：2018-07-26 09:21
【摘要】：埃里克·沃格林是20世纪西方最伟大的政治哲人之一,在实证主义氛围浓厚的美国政治学界,提出了要创建具有本体论基础的新政治科学。本文以他的《新政治科学》为切入点,采用文本分析的方法,解读沃格林的新政治科学观。 在梳理了沃格林的生平及其新政治科学思想的发展脉络、相关主题的研究作品之后,接着分析沃格林的政治科学的基本观点。对他而言,政治理论的核心问题是代表问题,对真理的代表具有三种类型：代议制民主意义上的、生存意义上的和超验意义上的。代表之争将引发社会失序,人与社会要重新获得秩序,需要再神圣化,而灵知主义就在这个再神圣化的过程中得到发展,演变成现代性。现代性的本质就是灵知主义的发展,现代社会各种意识形态都是灵知主义,灵知主义的自负将滑向极权主义。 在这种“现代性背景”下,沃格林政治科学的新旧之争,暗含了现代政治科学的内在紧张。沃格林的政治科学,其“新”处,在于他向读者介绍政治科学迄今为止被遮蔽了的发展,打破现代性的封闭,向超验实在敞开,在哲学人类学、历史哲学尤其是在意识哲学上面,奠定新政治科学的本体论基础,成为关心人朝向神性根基生存的科学,以此回应维柯的《新科学》；其“旧”处,在于沃格林的政治科学的理论渊源,是回到古典政治学上面,其问题范围和理论化处理方式跟柏拉图—亚里士多德的政治科学并无多大差异。然而,沃格林试图冲破现代学术规范的藩篱,重建“真正”的政治科学,并带动学界的理论旨趣转向,仍任重道远。
[Abstract]:Eric Wargren is one of the greatest political philosophers in the West in the 20th century. In the American political circles with a strong positivism atmosphere, he proposed the creation of a new political science with ontological basis. Taking his New political Science as the starting point, this paper uses the method of text analysis to interpret Wargren's view of New political Science. After combing out his life and the development of his new political science thoughts and his research works on related subjects, the author analyzes his basic viewpoints on political science. To him, the core problem of political theory is the representative problem, which has three types: representative democracy, survival and transcendental. The struggle for representation will lead to social disorder. If people and society want to regain order, they need to be reconsecrated, while Gnosticism has been developed in the process of resanctification and has evolved into modernity. The essence of modernity is the development of gnosticism. In modern society, all kinds of ideology are gnosticism, and the conceit of gnosticism will slip to totalitarianism. Under this kind of "modernity background", the debate between the old and the new in Wogling's political science implies the inherent tension of the modern political science. Wargren's political science, its "new" place, lies in his introduction to readers of the development of political science that has so far been obscured, breaking the closure of modernity and opening itself to transcendental reality in philosophical anthropology. The philosophy of history, especially in the philosophy of consciousness, lays the ontological foundation of the new political science and becomes the science concerned about the existence of man towards the foundation of divinity, in response to Vico's "New Science"; its "old" place. The theoretical origin of political science of Wargren is to return to classical politics, and its scope of problems and theoretical treatment are not much different from Plato-Aristotle's political science. However, Wulling still has a long way to go in his attempt to break through the barriers of modern academic norms, rebuild the "real" political science and drive the academic purport to turn.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D0
本文编号：2145564
[Abstract]:Eric Wargren is one of the greatest political philosophers in the West in the 20th century. In the American political circles with a strong positivism atmosphere, he proposed the creation of a new political science with ontological basis. Taking his New political Science as the starting point, this paper uses the method of text analysis to interpret Wargren's view of New political Science. After combing out his life and the development of his new political science thoughts and his research works on related subjects, the author analyzes his basic viewpoints on political science. To him, the core problem of political theory is the representative problem, which has three types: representative democracy, survival and transcendental. The struggle for representation will lead to social disorder. If people and society want to regain order, they need to be reconsecrated, while Gnosticism has been developed in the process of resanctification and has evolved into modernity. The essence of modernity is the development of gnosticism. In modern society, all kinds of ideology are gnosticism, and the conceit of gnosticism will slip to totalitarianism. Under this kind of "modernity background", the debate between the old and the new in Wogling's political science implies the inherent tension of the modern political science. Wargren's political science, its "new" place, lies in his introduction to readers of the development of political science that has so far been obscured, breaking the closure of modernity and opening itself to transcendental reality in philosophical anthropology. The philosophy of history, especially in the philosophy of consciousness, lays the ontological foundation of the new political science and becomes the science concerned about the existence of man towards the foundation of divinity, in response to Vico's "New Science"; its "old" place. The theoretical origin of political science of Wargren is to return to classical politics, and its scope of problems and theoretical treatment are not much different from Plato-Aristotle's political science. However, Wulling still has a long way to go in his attempt to break through the barriers of modern academic norms, rebuild the "real" political science and drive the academic purport to turn.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 杨龙;论沃格林的政治哲学[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
2 霍伟岸;;沃格林论现代性及其起源[J];读书;2010年05期
3 G.尼迈耶,戴侃;艾立克·沃格林(1901—1985)[J];国外社会科学;1985年06期
4 谢宝贵;;自然正当的神学之维——论埃里克·沃格林的自然正当观[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2009年01期
5 李强;;新保守主义与美国的全球战略[J];书城;2003年05期
，本文编号：2145564
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2145564.html
