新时代背景下对文明冲突论的再思考
发布时间：2018-10-13 07:55
【摘要】：塞缪尔·亨廷顿是美国最伟大的政治理论学家之一。1993年,他在《外交》杂志发表的题为《文明冲突?》的文章引起了轰动。这篇文章提出冷战以后的主要特征将是文明冲突,之后更是付梓成书。 亨廷顿写道,人类按照文化主线划分为西方文化、伊斯兰文化、印度文化等等。世界上不存在普世的文明,而存在的是各种文化区域,每一种文化都具有一套独特的价值体系。伊斯兰文化是最麻烦的,阿拉伯世界的人们并不拥有西方世界的理念。他们依附的主要自己的宗教而不是民族国家。他们的文化不适合某些自由的理想,如多元化、个人主义以及民主。 亨廷顿准确地预测到阿拉伯的强人政权是脆弱的,受到大量的失业年轻人的威胁。他认为,这些政权终会垮台的,但这些国家不会按照西方所指的方向走向现代化。在政权更迭的高潮中,反叛者可能会有选择性地借用西方的工具,但这种借用会通过他们的信仰而折射出来。他们将按照自己的轨迹前进,但不会变得更加西方化。亨廷顿的理论引发了激烈的争论。不过在历史性的变化席卷阿拉伯世界的现在,回头再审视他的论点具有启发作用。 本文分四部分阐释文明冲突论的产生与影响,运用最新的历史材料检验该理论的正确性与使用性,随之提出批判与修订。
[Abstract]:Samuel Huntington, one of America's greatest political theorists, caused a sensation in 1993 when he published an article in the Journal of diplomacy entitled "clash of Civilizations?" This article points out that the main feature of the post-cold war will be the clash of civilizations, which will then be published. Huntington writes that human beings are divided into Western culture, Islamic culture, Indian culture and so on. There is no universal civilization in the world, but a variety of cultural regions, each culture has a unique system of value. Islamic culture is the most troublesome. People in the Arab world do not have Western ideas. They are dependent mainly on their own religion, not on the nation-state. Their culture is not suited to certain liberal ideals, such as pluralism, individualism, and democracy. Huntington accurately predicted that the Arab strongman regime was fragile and threatened by a large number of unemployed young people. These regimes, he believes, will eventually fall, but they will not modernize in the direction the West suggests. At the height of regime change, rebels may selectively borrow Western tools, but such borrowing can be reflected by their beliefs. They will follow their own path, but will not become more westernized. Huntington's theory sparked a heated debate. But now that historic changes have swept the Arab world, it is instructive to look back at his arguments. This paper is divided into four parts to explain the emergence and influence of the theory of clash of civilizations, and to use the latest historical materials to test the correctness and practicability of the theory, and then to criticize and revise it.
【学位授予单位】：湖北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D091
本文编号：2267854
[Abstract]:Samuel Huntington, one of America's greatest political theorists, caused a sensation in 1993 when he published an article in the Journal of diplomacy entitled "clash of Civilizations?" This article points out that the main feature of the post-cold war will be the clash of civilizations, which will then be published. Huntington writes that human beings are divided into Western culture, Islamic culture, Indian culture and so on. There is no universal civilization in the world, but a variety of cultural regions, each culture has a unique system of value. Islamic culture is the most troublesome. People in the Arab world do not have Western ideas. They are dependent mainly on their own religion, not on the nation-state. Their culture is not suited to certain liberal ideals, such as pluralism, individualism, and democracy. Huntington accurately predicted that the Arab strongman regime was fragile and threatened by a large number of unemployed young people. These regimes, he believes, will eventually fall, but they will not modernize in the direction the West suggests. At the height of regime change, rebels may selectively borrow Western tools, but such borrowing can be reflected by their beliefs. They will follow their own path, but will not become more westernized. Huntington's theory sparked a heated debate. But now that historic changes have swept the Arab world, it is instructive to look back at his arguments. This paper is divided into four parts to explain the emergence and influence of the theory of clash of civilizations, and to use the latest historical materials to test the correctness and practicability of the theory, and then to criticize and revise it.
【学位授予单位】：湖北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D091
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏新龙;遍布全球的宗教复兴[J];浙江传媒学院学报;2004年04期
2 周桂银;中国、美国与国际伦理——对冷战后人道主义干涉的一项比较研究(1991—1999年)[J];国际政治研究;2003年04期
3 S.P.亨廷顿 ,张林宏;文明的冲突[J];国外社会科学;1993年10期
4 萧俊明;文明的困惑——关于文明冲突论的断想[J];国外社会科学;2002年03期
5 魏晓锋，朱月潭;亨廷顿“文明冲突论”剖析[J];国外社会科学;1996年02期
6 平野健一郎,黄东兰译;是文明的冲突,还是文化的摩擦——亨廷顿论文批判[J];国外社会科学;1997年02期
7 苏浩;文明在国际关系中的冲突与合作——从亨廷顿的“文明冲突论”谈起[J];世界历史;1998年03期
8 徐国琦;塞缪尔·P·亨廷顿及其“文明冲突”论[J];美国研究;1994年01期
9 张家栋;;文明冲突与恐怖主义:想象还是现实?[J];社会科学;2009年04期
10 郑彪;;“文明冲突”论的国际政治经济学分析[J];马克思主义研究;2009年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 石轶;文明冲突论视角下的文化安全探析及战略思考[D];山东大学;2008年
，本文编号：2267854
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2267854.html
