论马克思恩格斯的民族国家观
[Abstract]:Marx and Engels did not discuss the theory of nation-state. To them, nationality is only a subordinate concept of class and political state, and the state is mostly limited to political state. The mono-national state is the type of nation-state in the classical liberalism and its early capitalism, and the essence of the supranational state is capital imperialism. The criticism of classical liberalism, state science, historicism, conservatism and "civilized country" shows that Marx and Engels do not agree with the political construction of a single nation state or a supranational state, and criticize Smith and Liszt. That is to say, it contains the critique of the national view of the single nation, the critique of the Empire, that is, the critique of the supranational state. According to Marx and Engels' socialized thought, nationality is only a special type of society, so it is not suitable to materialize and should not be opposed to the state. Unlike many national economists who deliberately confuse the national (nation) with the national (ethnic), Marx advocated a clear distinction between the two. In Marx's own political theory, It already contains the idea of the unity of ethnic group construction and ethnic cultural diversity. Engels' distinction between national (nation) and national (nationality) opens the distinction between "political nation" (political nation) and "cultural nation" (cultural nation) in modern political theory. In understanding Marx and Engels' national theory and its state theory, it is necessary to combine class analysis with the historical construction of human subjectivity. And all kinds of populist national views need to be criticized. Marx and Engels transcend capitalism, oppose populism, anarchism and radicalism, which contains the affirmation of the form of multi-ethnic state, and is also the basic resource for the construction of modern China's multi-ethnic state.
【作者单位】: 复旦大学哲学学院;
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前3条
1 张光博;;第十七讲 历史唯物主义的国家观[A];学习历史唯物论二十讲[C];2004年
2 承红磊;;萧公权与后五四国家观——以《政治多元论》为中心[A];近代思想史研究(第10辑)[C];2013年
3 胡昌泰;;董必武的法治国家观与新时期的依法治国[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第二辑)[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 中国社科院近代史研究所研究员 雷颐;“非锁国的”爱国精神[N];经济观察报;2008年
2 特邀嘉宾 国防大学研究员 郭凤海;寻觅那一声血性的呐喊[N];光明日报;2011年
3 中共中央党校教授、中国统战理论研究会甘肃基地研究员 龚学增;中国共产党的“宗教—国家观”(上)[N];中国民族报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 范伟;新国家观[D];中共中央党校;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王晨;梁启超国家观演变探析[D];中原工学院;2015年
2 邹丹丹;马克思与柏拉图国家观的比较研究[D];贵州师范大学;2016年
3 付天阳;马克思国家观及其当代价值研究[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2016年
4 陈安安;马克思国家观对当代国家治理的启示[D];福建师范大学;2016年
5 殷昱伟;资本批判视域中的马克思国家观研究[D];西南大学;2012年
6 浦永;中国特色社会主义国家观[D];云南师范大学;2013年
7 董俊;梁启超近代国家观形成的日本因素[D];东北师范大学;2006年
8 蒋龙龙;晚清(1895-1911)知识分子民族国家观研究[D];山东大学;2012年
9 尚伟;《德意志意识形态》的国家观[D];西南政法大学;2012年
10 卜晓东;马克思主义国家观研究[D];内蒙古大学;2014年
,本文编号:2301846
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2301846.html