政治动员的表现逻辑
发布时间：2018-11-20 09:39
【摘要】： 政治动员是政治发展的重要手段之一,近年来学者在研究政治动员仅局限在特定时空的研究范围之内,并没有对此作一般性的理论探索。对此,笔者沿着政治动员所需内在条件为线索,从一般理论的层面上,沿着其内在的逻辑,对政治动员表现出的现象进行一定的研究,进而从其内在逻辑上得到一定的启示。 政治动员其理论上的条件最早可追溯到古希腊柏拉图的理念论,随后经马基雅维利、卢梭、康德等人的发展,最终完善于卡尔马克思的政治学说。沿着政治动员所需条件:动员主体较高的认知水平、动员主体的强势地位和动员过程中方法手段的有效性这三个内在条件,可以发现政治动员在逻辑上通常表现在三个方面,即精英政治、威权体制和过程中的平等观念,进而理清了政治动员的一般逻辑表现。 从政治动员的内在逻辑来看,其动员总是在一定的理性的框架内进行,但在现实中又往往难以定量,这使得其在实践中往往表现出一定的有效性和负面效应。因此,政治动员作为政治发展的手段并非万能,其只是政治发展的一种可选择的手段,只有在特定的时空背景下才能更好的发挥作用。
[Abstract]:Political mobilization is one of the important means of political development. In recent years, scholars have not made a general theoretical exploration in studying political mobilization only within the scope of a specific time and space. In this regard, the author follows the internal conditions of political mobilization as a clue, from the general theory level, along with its internal logic, political mobilization shows a certain study of the phenomenon, and then from its internal logic to get some inspiration. The theoretical conditions of political mobilization can be traced back to Plato's theory of philosophy in ancient Greece. After the development of Machiavelli, Rousseau, Kant and so on, the political theory of Karl Marx was finally perfected. Along with the three internal conditions of political mobilization: the higher cognitive level of the mobilization subject, the strong position of the mobilization subject and the effectiveness of the method and means in the mobilization process, it can be found that the political mobilization is usually manifested in three aspects logically. The idea of equality in elite politics, authoritarian system and process clarifies the general logic of political mobilization. From the internal logic of political mobilization, its mobilization is always carried out within a certain rational framework, but it is often difficult to quantify in reality, which makes it often show certain effectiveness and negative effect in practice. Therefore, political mobilization as a means of political development is not omnipotent, it is only an optional means of political development, only in a specific time and space background can play a better role.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D0
本文编号：2344558
[Abstract]:Political mobilization is one of the important means of political development. In recent years, scholars have not made a general theoretical exploration in studying political mobilization only within the scope of a specific time and space. In this regard, the author follows the internal conditions of political mobilization as a clue, from the general theory level, along with its internal logic, political mobilization shows a certain study of the phenomenon, and then from its internal logic to get some inspiration. The theoretical conditions of political mobilization can be traced back to Plato's theory of philosophy in ancient Greece. After the development of Machiavelli, Rousseau, Kant and so on, the political theory of Karl Marx was finally perfected. Along with the three internal conditions of political mobilization: the higher cognitive level of the mobilization subject, the strong position of the mobilization subject and the effectiveness of the method and means in the mobilization process, it can be found that the political mobilization is usually manifested in three aspects logically. The idea of equality in elite politics, authoritarian system and process clarifies the general logic of political mobilization. From the internal logic of political mobilization, its mobilization is always carried out within a certain rational framework, but it is often difficult to quantify in reality, which makes it often show certain effectiveness and negative effect in practice. Therefore, political mobilization as a means of political development is not omnipotent, it is only an optional means of political development, only in a specific time and space background can play a better role.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何新华;机运与局限:发展型威权政体的政治合法性[J];东南亚研究;2005年02期
2 占美柏;威权政治下的宪法权威——二战后东亚国家的政治体制转型[J];东南亚研究;2005年03期
3 于建嵘;;共治威权与法治威权——中国政治发展的问题和出路[J];当代世界社会主义问题;2008年04期
4 刘瑛瑛;;“从平等到自由”的关联与阻断——卢梭平等思想的理路及其评价[J];华东政法大学学报;2007年04期
5 李征;简论“政治动员”[J];河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
6 冯秀文;世界政治史研究中的威权主义及其历史定位——以拉丁美洲为例[J];世界历史;2005年02期
7 张敏卿;中国共产党民众动员战略口号三次变化的历史特点及经验[J];江汉论坛;2005年07期
8 孔繁斌;;政治动员的行动逻辑——一个概念模型及其应用[J];江苏行政学院学报;2006年05期
9 魏泉琪;绿苑标语小议[J];绿化与生活;1999年03期
10 高永久;柳建文;;民族政治精英论[J];南开学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 吴开松;当代中国危机动员研究[D];华中师范大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 黄兢;建国初期中国共产党的政治动员研究[D];华南师范大学;2003年
2 王兴东;土地革命时期中共政治动员概述[D];吉林大学;2008年
，本文编号：2344558
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2344558.html
