多民族国家统一构设视域中的公共空间政治

发布时间：2018-12-23 07:54

【摘要】：在当代多民族国家统一构设中,公共空间问题是一个重要相关变量。多民族国家围绕公共空间进行政策设计时,就产生公共空间政治。多民族国家统一构设中的公共空间之所以重要,是因为公共空间具有民族文化符号承载性和政治社会化功能。由于公共空间在多民族国家统一构设中的重要性日益彰显,越来越多的国家试图通过公共空间的象征符号强化国家身份,或者为公共空间重新命名,让文本、口号和地名的使用占据公共空间的核心,或者通过公共建筑强化国家认同,通过视觉冲击强化政治效忠。由于多民族国家统一构设中的公共空间与传统、认同以及权力有着密切的关联,又有助于政权的稳定性与统治的合法性,因此,多民族国家统一构设中的公共空间政治的特点表现为两种不同的路径:其一是文化民族主义路径;其二是整合主义路径。虽然不同国家对于公共空间政治的路径选择不同,但实现国家认同是他们共同的目标。中国作为多民族国家,也可以在本国历史与传统的基础上,重视"符号"以及由符号建构而成的意义,借鉴他国的公共空间政治社会化模式,在"差异性"与"统合性"之间寻求一个平衡点与缓解机制。
[Abstract]:The problem of public space is an important variable in the unified construction of modern multi-national countries. When the multi-national country carries on the policy design around the public space, produces the public space politics. The reason for the importance of the public space in the unified construction of a multi-ethnic country is that the public space has the bearing capacity of national cultural symbols and the function of political socialization. Due to the increasing importance of public space in the unified construction of a multi-ethnic country, more and more countries try to strengthen their national identity through the symbol of public space, or rename public space so that the text, The use of slogans and place names occupies the heart of public space, or strengthens national identity through public buildings and political allegiance through visual shocks. Because the public space in the unified construction of a multi-ethnic state is closely related to tradition, identity and power, and contributes to the stability of the regime and the legitimacy of its rule, The characteristics of the politics of public space in the unified construction of a multi-ethnic country are characterized by two different paths: one is the path of cultural nationalism; The other is the path of integralism. Although different countries have different paths to public space politics, the realization of national identity is their common goal. As a multi-ethnic country, China can also, on the basis of its own history and tradition, attach importance to "symbols" and the significance formed by the construction of symbols, and draw lessons from other countries' modes of political socialization in public space. Seek a balance point and mitigation mechanism between "difference" and "integration".
【作者单位】：首都师范大学政法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“中亚与中国新疆恐怖主义问题应对机制比较研究”(13B22029)
【分类号】：D091.5

【共引文献】