弥尔顿与近代英国共和主义
发布时间:2019-03-30 18:16
【摘要】:约翰·弥尔顿是英国内战时期十分重要的共和主义思想家。他反对暴君,为处死国王声辩;主张在英国建立共和制;还提议设立永不休会的最高议事会作为主权的代表者,辅以地方自治,以建设和平、安全、繁荣的自由共和国。弥尔顿抛弃了古典的混合政体理想,却并未附和"公民人文主义"的德行话语;他持有坚定的共和理想,但考虑实际问题时,亦重视后果的权衡;他的自由观,有别于新罗马作家的政治自由概念。弥尔顿的共和主义,兼顾"智慧"与"同意",融古典与现代于一体,属于一种修正了的共和方案。
[Abstract]:John Milton was a very important Republican thinker during the British Civil War. He argued against tyranny, arguing for the death of the king; advocating a republic in Britain; and proposing the establishment of a supreme council that would never adjourn as a representative of sovereignty, supplemented by local self-government to build a peaceful, secure and prosperous free republic. Milton abandoned the classical ideal of mixed form of government, but did not concur with the moral discourse of "civic humanism"; he held a firm Republican ideal, but when considering practical problems, he also attached importance to the trade-off of consequences; His view of freedom is different from the concept of political freedom of the new Roman writers. Milton's republicanism, taking into account wisdom and consent, combines classical and modern together, and belongs to a revised Republican scheme.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学;
【分类号】:D095.61
本文编号:2450357
[Abstract]:John Milton was a very important Republican thinker during the British Civil War. He argued against tyranny, arguing for the death of the king; advocating a republic in Britain; and proposing the establishment of a supreme council that would never adjourn as a representative of sovereignty, supplemented by local self-government to build a peaceful, secure and prosperous free republic. Milton abandoned the classical ideal of mixed form of government, but did not concur with the moral discourse of "civic humanism"; he held a firm Republican ideal, but when considering practical problems, he also attached importance to the trade-off of consequences; His view of freedom is different from the concept of political freedom of the new Roman writers. Milton's republicanism, taking into account wisdom and consent, combines classical and modern together, and belongs to a revised Republican scheme.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学;
【分类号】:D095.61
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 于书茵;;浅析牢狱之灾对弥尔顿创作风格的影响[J];辽宁省社会主义学院学报;2014年02期
2 周钢;;为自由奉献双目的斗士——弥尔顿[J];中国残疾人;1996年10期
3 孙继静;;弥尔顿自由主义中的个体意识[J];长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期
4 李琛;;无人倾听的讲述[J];电子知识产权;2006年01期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 诗人、《空中生活》主编 周江林;重读弥尔顿:光明与自由的畅想[N];华夏时报;2014年
2 张莹;自由胜过眼睛[N];中华新闻报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘小玲;弥尔顿共和主义思想研究[D];南京大学;2014年
2 陈碧园;约翰·弥尔顿政治思想研究[D];山东大学;2008年
3 贾延红;试论弥尔顿三部长诗中的救赎主题[D];湘潭大学;2008年
4 赵勋;弥尔顿的诗学理想[D];西南大学;2009年
5 晁若男;约翰·弥尔顿及其法理思想评析[D];华东政法大学;2009年
6 刘小欣;走向和谐[D];西南大学;2011年
7 徐迪彦;弥尔顿诗歌伦理学批评初探[D];华东师范大学;2006年
8 范璀莹;弥尔顿的自由观论析[D];吉林大学;2008年
9 李晓丹;论弥尔顿宗教长诗中的罪恶观[D];华东师范大学;2008年
10 吴化刚;弥尔顿的“反抗权”理论[D];西南政法大学;2013年
,本文编号:2450357
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2450357.html