程序与实质:一种对罗尔斯的辩护与批评
发布时间：2019-04-10 09:22
【摘要】：公共理性是政治哲学的一个重要问题。哈贝马斯与罗尔斯曾就该问题进行过一场精彩的对话。哈贝马斯认为,罗尔斯的理论看似具有程序主义的设计,其实并未摆脱自由主义的实质性预设。事实上,罗尔斯的公共理性并非如哈贝马斯所言,完全缺少程序性的因素,不过,他的公共理性的确存在一些重要缺陷。公共理性的讨论者需要公开陈述自己的理由,从而相互援引和辩难,而罗尔斯未对公民在政治问题中如何运用公共理由做出详细的说明。在这一点上,哈贝马斯的商谈规则有助于补充罗尔斯的理论。
[Abstract]:Public rationality is an important issue in political philosophy. Habermas and Rawls had a wonderful dialogue on the issue. Habermas believes that Rawls' theory seems to have a procedural design, in fact, it does not get rid of the substantial presupposition of liberalism. In fact, Rawls' public rationality is not completely lack of procedural factors, as Habermas said, but there are some important defects in his public rationality. Public rational discussants need to publicly state their reasons, thus invoking and debating each other, and Rawls does not give a detailed explanation of how citizens use public reasons in political issues. In this regard, Habermas's rules of negotiation help complement Rawls' theory.
【作者单位】： 香港中文大学哲学系;
【分类号】：D0
[Abstract]:Public rationality is an important issue in political philosophy. Habermas and Rawls had a wonderful dialogue on the issue. Habermas believes that Rawls' theory seems to have a procedural design, in fact, it does not get rid of the substantial presupposition of liberalism. In fact, Rawls' public rationality is not completely lack of procedural factors, as Habermas said, but there are some important defects in his public rationality. Public rational discussants need to publicly state their reasons, thus invoking and debating each other, and Rawls does not give a detailed explanation of how citizens use public reasons in political issues. In this regard, Habermas's rules of negotiation help complement Rawls' theory.
【作者单位】： 香港中文大学哲学系;
【分类号】：D0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邓;李海青;;政治哲学视野中的公共理性的特点[J];资料通讯;2007年02期
2 史云贵;黄炯z，
本文编号：2455676
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2455676.html
