托克维尔的“多数”概念与“少数”心结
发布时间：2019-04-11 10:41
【摘要】：托克维尔《论美国的民主》沿柏拉图、亚里士多德、中古思想家、启蒙思想家、美国联邦党人一脉学者的思路,讨论了美国民主中的"多数"与"少数"、"民主暴政"等问题,提出了"多数的无限权威"、"民主政体立法不稳定"等概念和结论。但这些研究缺乏应有的缜密和确当,有些论述恐只是逻辑推理而难以符合实际,有关历史资料的使用也缺乏严谨性或历史感,一些分析甚至似是而非。而由于深存贵族心结,作者的理论还带有感情色彩。我们的使命则应是在继承他的思想精华的同时,弥补不足,修正错误,以一种建设性的新型理论设计,推动当代政治的健康发展。
[Abstract]:Tocqueville, on American Democracy, discusses the "majority" and "minority" in American democracy along the lines of Plato, Aristotle, Middle Ancient thinker, Enlightenment thinker, and American Federal Party scholar. The concepts and conclusions of "democratic tyranny" are put forward, such as "unlimited authority of majority" and "unstable legislation of democratic regime". However, these studies lack due meticulous and accurate, some statements may be just logical reasoning and difficult to conform to the reality, the use of relevant historical data is also lack of rigor or sense of history, some analysis is even paradoxical. As a result of the deep nobleman knot, the author's theory also has the emotion color. While inheriting the essence of his thoughts, our mission should be to make up for the shortcomings, correct the mistakes, and promote the healthy development of contemporary politics with a new constructive theoretical design.
【作者单位】： 山东大学;
【基金】：985工程项目“西方宪政历程”
【分类号】：D091
[Abstract]:Tocqueville, on American Democracy, discusses the "majority" and "minority" in American democracy along the lines of Plato, Aristotle, Middle Ancient thinker, Enlightenment thinker, and American Federal Party scholar. The concepts and conclusions of "democratic tyranny" are put forward, such as "unlimited authority of majority" and "unstable legislation of democratic regime". However, these studies lack due meticulous and accurate, some statements may be just logical reasoning and difficult to conform to the reality, the use of relevant historical data is also lack of rigor or sense of history, some analysis is even paradoxical. As a result of the deep nobleman knot, the author's theory also has the emotion color. While inheriting the essence of his thoughts, our mission should be to make up for the shortcomings, correct the mistakes, and promote the healthy development of contemporary politics with a new constructive theoretical design.
【作者单位】： 山东大学;
【基金】：985工程项目“西方宪政历程”
【分类号】：D091
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑晓华;达尔经济民主思想述评[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年02期
2 奚玮,何艳芳;“治愈”抑或“缓解”:死刑复核程序改革论析[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2005年03期
3 张云昊;;从前现代到现代——共同体变迁的内在逻辑及其启示[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期
4 方玮;共生理念——全球化进程中的价值建构[J];长白学刊;2001年06期
5 刘雪华;论我国公共权力的制约机制——一种政府公共性的视角[J];长白学刊;2004年06期
6 宋全成;解永照;;法律制度的界定[J];长春市委党校学报;2006年04期
7 樊华强;;从宗教文化透视美国高等教育捐赠传统[J];湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
8 郭为桂;公共空间与公民参与:大众民主的困境及其出路[J];重庆社会科学;2005年09期
9 李月凤;我国非营利组织的发展与政府职能转变[J];重庆社会科学;2005年11期
10 张善喜;刘永红;;论和谐社会视角下的行政权力制约[J];重庆邮电学院学报(社会科学版);2006年02期
相关会议论文 前7条
1 单波;肖s，
本文编号：2456342
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2456342.html
