基于协商民主的行政决策听证探析

发布时间：2019-08-17 21:28

【摘要】：以平等尊重、理性讨论、信息公开为核心理念的协商民主,是20世纪90年代以来兴起于西方的一种重要的民主参与理论,被认为是解决社会利益冲突、强化决策理性与正当性、增进社会共识与信任的良方,得到了学界和政府部门的广泛关注,一度成为政治理论的显学。听证作为协商民主的一种实践形式,在我国很多行政决策领域都得到了广泛应用,取得了较好的社会效果。但与协商民主对公民参与决策的要求相比,我国目前的听证制度在听证目的、听证程序、听证事项的设定权、听证代表的选择权及听证的公信力等方面仍有较大的改进空间。从协商民主的视角出发,可以从引导公众做好听证准备、优选听证代表、实行结构化的公开理性讨论、听证主持人保持中立、鼓励参与听证的各方代表保持对他人的平等与尊重、赋予听证结果一定的约束效力等方面对现有的行政决策听证制度进行充实和完善。
[Abstract]:Consultative democracy, with equal respect, rational discussion and information disclosure as the core concepts, is an important theory of democratic participation in the West since the 1990s. It is considered to be a good way to solve social conflicts of interest, strengthen the rationality and legitimacy of decision-making, and enhance social consensus and trust. It has been widely concerned by academic circles and government departments, and has once become a prominent study of political theory. As a practical form of consultative democracy, hearing has been widely used in many fields of administrative decision-making in our country, and has achieved good social results. However, compared with the requirements of consultative democracy for citizens to participate in decision-making, the current hearing system in our country still has more room for improvement in the aspects of hearing purpose, hearing procedure, right to set up hearing matters, choice of hearing representatives and credibility of hearing. From the perspective of consultative democracy, the existing administrative decision hearing system can be enriched and improved from the aspects of guiding the public to prepare for the hearing, selecting the hearing representatives, carrying out the structured public rational discussion, maintaining the neutrality of the hearing moderator, encouraging the representatives of all parties participating in the hearing to maintain equality and respect for others, and giving the hearing results a certain restraint effect.
【作者单位】：吉林大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：D035

【参考文献】