礼的“义”“仪”关系之辨
发布时间：2018-01-31 16:36
本文关键词： 礼义 礼仪 礼意 变动 出处：《中国哲学史》2017年01期 论文类型：期刊论文
【摘要】：礼学的"义"与"仪"的关系,是中国古代礼学研究中的重要课题,在以往的研究中,学者多从"精神—器物"或"形式—内容"的路径对两者进行探讨。本文认为,这样的理解,实是基于"本体论"的视角,即以"义"为本,以"仪"为末。事实上,礼的"义"与"仪"之间的关系并不适合"本体"式的诠释,"义"并不比"仪"更为本质,而是由"义"—"仪"—"意"的整体所形成的"际会"(通变)的理论来理解,才是"礼"的关键所在。
[Abstract]:The relationship of the ritual of "righteousness" and "instrument", is an important issue in the study of the ancient ritual China, in previous studies, to explore the two scholars from "spirit objects" or "form and content" path. This paper argues that this understanding is based on "the body on" perspective, namely "meaning" as the "instrument" to the end. In fact, the relationship between the rite of "righteousness" and "instrument" is not suitable for the interpretation of "ontology", "righteousness" is no better than "instrument" is more essential, but by "righteousness" and "instrument" meaning "the overall form" will be the occasion (change) the theory to understand, is the "ceremony" of the key.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学人文与传播学院;
【基金】：2012年度国家社科基金重大项目“中国礼制变迁及其现代价值研究”(编号:12&ZD134)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K892.9
【正文快照】： (1)陈戍国引沈文倬未刊稿《觐礼本义》,《先秦礼制研究》,长沙:湖南教育出版社,1991年,第18页。(2)武内义雄:《礼记の研究》,《武内义雄全集》第二卷,角川f，
本文编号：1479511
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/1479511.html
