论古代中国的国家观与天下观——边境与边界形成的历史坐标
发布时间:2018-04-11 14:54
本文选题:国家 + 对手 ; 参考:《中国边疆史地研究》2007年03期
【摘要】:本文认为,中国古代并没有真正意义上的国家观,各王朝所持有的是天下观。即在法理上,中原王朝并不认为天下有与自己平起平坐的国家。这一观念自先秦时期奠定之后,影响深远,即便是由传统的"蛮夷之邦"入主中原的王朝也不自觉地接受了这一政治观念。但是,天下观在其长期的政治实践中,却不得不每每面临诸多强大对手的挑战。因此,每当此时,双方的实际控制线就有了一定的边界含义。不过,真正近代意义上的边界出现于清朝。即当清朝面临沙俄这样从未接触过的具有全新文明的强大对手的挑战时,近代意义上的国与国之间的边界才最终形成。换言之,只有当中国面临的对手足够强大,或者说其文明受阻于强敌时,天下观才转为国家观,有边无界的状态才得以消解。
[Abstract]:This paper argues that there was no real sense of state view in ancient China, and that all dynasties held a view of the world.That is, in the legal theory, the Central Plains Dynasty did not think that the world and their own country on an equal footing.Since the pre-Qin period, this concept has a profound influence, even the traditional "barbarian state" into the Central Plains dynasty unconsciously accepted this political concept.However, the world view in its long-term political practice, but often have to face the challenges of many strong opponents.Therefore, each time, both sides of the actual control line has a certain boundary meaning.However, the real modern sense of the boundary appeared in the Qing Dynasty.That is, when the Qing Dynasty faced the challenge of a powerful opponent with a new civilization, which had never been contacted by Russia, the boundary between countries in the modern sense was finally formed.In other words, only when China faces a strong enough adversary, or if its civilization is blocked by a strong enemy, can the view of the world be transformed into a state view, and the borderless state of being dispelled.
【作者单位】:
【分类号】:K207
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苏亮;;清代马政述略[J];安徽文学(下半月);2010年03期
2 史可非;;试论清朝在对历代帝王庙建成统一多民族国家祭祀体系上的贡献[J];安徽文学(下半月);2010年04期
3 苏亮;;清(后金)政权关外统治时期军制述略[J];安徽文学(下半月);2010年06期
4 张,
本文编号:1736462
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/1736462.html