20世纪20年代北大与东大学术文化论争的实质——以《新青年》与《学衡》为中心

发布时间：2018-04-16 18:42

本文选题：北大 + 东大　；参考：《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：20世纪20年代前期,北京大学和东南大学是中国现代高等教育的两大重镇,双方在学术文化上展开激烈的竞争。其中《新青年》杂志与《学衡》杂志是两个主要新媒体阵地,双方围绕文学的新旧与真假、文言与白话的优劣、孔子与传统文化、新人文主义与实验主义等问题展开针锋相对的论战,并呈现出传统与现代、新旧之争的表象,其实质亦远远超出中西之争的范围。北大派与东大派的学术文化之争集中昭示西方现代大学进入中国后始终面临如何处理中国传统文化与西方现代化的难题。《新青年》与《学衡》的文化论争所依托的主体是北京大学与东南大学,充分显示出现代学人纷纷借助大学这一新的平台,传播其文化观念的种种努力,这一现象亦成为民国"学分南北"的重要地缘与派分源头。
[Abstract]:In the early 1920s, Peking University and Southeast University were two important cities of modern higher education in China.Among them, New Youth magazine and Xueheng magazine are the two main new media positions. The two sides revolve around the new and old literature, the truth and falsehood, the merits and demerits of classical Chinese and vernacular, Confucius and traditional culture.Neo-humanism and experimentalism have launched a tit-for-tat controversy and presented the appearance of traditional, modern, new and old disputes, the essence of which is far beyond the scope of the Sino-Western controversy.The academic and cultural controversy between Peking University School and Dongda School shows how to deal with the problem of Chinese traditional culture and western modernization after western modern universities enter China. The cultural controversy between "New Youth" and "Xueheng" is based on.The main bodies are Peking University and Southeast University,It fully shows that modern scholars have used the university as a new platform to spread their cultural ideas. This phenomenon has also become an important source of geography and distribution of credit in the Republic of China.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学近代史研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“近代中国大学与社会”(12JJD77019) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目资助(CCNU16Z02004)
【分类号】：K203

【相似文献】