中国史研究:“国际化”还是“中国化”
发布时间：2019-06-11 20:17
【摘要】：2007年11月由历史研究编辑部、世界历史编辑部、中国社会科学院世界历史研究所和辽宁大学共同举办了"中国世界史学科体系建设研讨会",与会学者进行了广泛而热烈的交流和讨论,既有共识,也存在分歧。共识是应该扬弃以"西欧中心论"为核心所构建的世界史体系,建设有中国特色的世界史体系。改革开放三十年来国际国内环境的变化,国际学术界交往的不断扩大,中国历史学工作者(包括中国史学者和世界史学者)的辛勤努力和认知高度为此提供了前提和可能;分歧则在于以什么为核心来构建、怎样构建有中国特色的世界史体系。众说纷纭,各抒己见。本刊约请数位陈述代表性观点的学者撰写笔谈,以期引起所有史学工作者和爱好者的关注,通过讨论,进一步推进和深化有中国特色的世界史体系的建设。
[Abstract]:In November,2007, the Seminar on the Construction of the World History of China was co-organized by the Editorial Department of the History, the Editorial Department of the World History, the World History Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and the University of Maryland, and the participating scholars conducted a wide and warm exchange and discussion. The consensus is that the world history system, which is built by "The Central Theory of Western Europe" as the core, should be discarded, and the world history system with Chinese characteristics should be built. In the past 30 years of reform and opening-up, the international and domestic environment has changed, and the international academic community has been expanding. Chinese history workers (including the Chinese history scholars and the world history scholars) have provided the premise and possibility for this purpose. The differences lie in the construction of the core. How to build a world history system with Chinese characteristics. All the words are in their own opinions. The journal of the People's Republic of China has written a written discussion on the representative point of view, with a view to attracting the attention of all the historians and fans, and further promoting and deepening the construction of the world history system with Chinese characteristics through the discussion.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学人文学院
【分类号】：K207
[Abstract]:In November,2007, the Seminar on the Construction of the World History of China was co-organized by the Editorial Department of the History, the Editorial Department of the World History, the World History Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and the University of Maryland, and the participating scholars conducted a wide and warm exchange and discussion. The consensus is that the world history system, which is built by "The Central Theory of Western Europe" as the core, should be discarded, and the world history system with Chinese characteristics should be built. In the past 30 years of reform and opening-up, the international and domestic environment has changed, and the international academic community has been expanding. Chinese history workers (including the Chinese history scholars and the world history scholars) have provided the premise and possibility for this purpose. The differences lie in the construction of the core. How to build a world history system with Chinese characteristics. All the words are in their own opinions. The journal of the People's Republic of China has written a written discussion on the representative point of view, with a view to attracting the attention of all the historians and fans, and further promoting and deepening the construction of the world history system with Chinese characteristics through the discussion.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学人文学院
【分类号】：K207
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 黄宗智;中国经济史中的悖论现象与当前的规范认识危机[J];史学理论研究;1993年01期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王勇;迈向反思的法理学——一种全球化背景下法律移植的视角[J];华东政法学院学报;2005年05期
2 曹树基;清代江苏城市人口研究[J];杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
3 徐晖;杭州城市化进程中小城镇品质的提升[J];中共杭州市委党校学报;2003年03期
4 王学典;从“历史理论”到“史学理论”——新时期以来中国史学理论研究的回顾与展望[J];江西社会科学;2005年06期
5 萧楼,王小军;互构村庄:权力转换机制与村庄治理结构──一个农村政治学研究的分析性框架[J];开放时代;2001年03期
6 马克W，
本文编号：2497421
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2497421.html
