当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 宗教论文 >

印顺与牟宗三的真谛学判释之比较研究

发布时间:2018-02-01 15:46

  本文关键词: 阿摩罗识 自性清净心 真谛学 唯识学 判释 出处:《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年02期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:牟宗三将真谛"阿摩罗识自性清净心"解释为"心本清净",以此为核心观念,将其溯源至弥勒学,并综合真谛译著,赋予"阿摩罗自性清净心"以"本觉"义,最终将真谛学定位为"善绍弥勒学,而向真心派走"。印顺对牟宗三的真谛学判释做了回应,以"赖耶通真妄"一观念为真谛学之底里,将真谛学定位为"糅合如来藏学与瑜伽学";之后则明确拒绝将"阿摩罗自性清净心"视为"本觉"心、反对将其作《大乘起信论》式的解读,坚持真谛之基本立场为唯识学。印顺与牟宗三两位大师的真谛研究,是在"创造的诠释学"之"当谓"与"必谓"层次上的诠释活动,他们各自站在自身立场与教相判释的基础上,做融会贯通的工作,并提出了新课题,为我们呈现出真谛学的新面貌。比较印顺与牟宗三真谛学之判释,不仅可以帮助我们进一步拓宽真谛学的研究理路,寻求诠释真谛学的新路径;亦可以帮助我们考察两位重要学者的立场与方法在创造性诠释中所具有的具体诠释效果和意义。
[Abstract]:Mou Zongsan interpreted the true meaning of "Amoro self-nature and pure heart" as "pure and pure", taking this as the core concept, traced it back to Maitreya, and translated the true meaning. Endow "Moro self-nature and pure heart" with the meaning of "this sense", and finally position the true meaning science as "the good Shao Maitreya study, but go to the sincere school" .Inson responded to Mou Zongsan's interpretation of the true meaning theory. Based on the concept of "Lai Yetong is true and false", the study of truth is defined as "blending Tathagata with Yoga". After that, he explicitly refused to regard "the self-nature of the Moro as a pure mind" as a "sense of this", and opposed to the interpretation of "Mahayana's theory of faith" as "Mahayana's theory of faith". The study of the true meaning of the two masters, Yin Shun and Mou Zongsan, is a hermeneutical activity on the level of "the creation of hermeneutics" and "must be said to be". They stand on the basis of their own stand and the interpretation of religion, doing comprehensive work, and put forward a new topic, showing us a new face of true science. Compared with Mou Zongsan's interpretation of true meaning. It can not only help us to further broaden the research path of truth science, but also seek a new way to interpret truth science. It can also help us to investigate the concrete effect and significance of the two important scholars' positions and methods in creative interpretation.
【作者单位】: 北京大学哲学系;
【分类号】:B948
【正文快照】: 对于真谛学之定位,历来充满争议。内学院吕o,

本文编号:1482225

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/1482225.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d2ed5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com