“唯识比量”中“自许”简别的作用与局限

发布时间：2018-04-11 00:32

本文选题：唯识比量 + 简别　；参考：《哲学分析》2017年06期

【摘要】："唯识比量"论辩的主题是色境(对象)是否脱离眼识而存在;它针对的立敌双方是唯识论者与实在论者。它的因支满足因三相,特点是使用了简别语。对于因支中简别语"自许"的解释传统上以窥基为代表,他认为"自许"是意许了唯识宗的"不离眼识色"。窥基的解释颇为牵强,因为色境是否不离眼识本身就是双方争论的所在,不需要"自许"为"不离眼识色",否则就有乞求论题之嫌。另外,"自许"也不是对因支中"眼所不摄"的简别,因为"摄"字应当理解为包摄的意思,这样一方面与前一个摄字相对应,另一方面对象不为眼根所包括也是立敌双方都认可的,无需加上"自许"的简别。在排除了以上说法之后,简别语"自许"只能是加在因支前半部分的"初三摄"上,其作用在于重新规定比量讨论的范围,即只是讨论在色境、眼识和眼根这三要素中,眼识和色境必定具有不相离而相属的关系。但是,此做法的局限性在于论域狭小,论敌可以模仿该比量利用论域的限制提出"相违决定量"。
[Abstract]:The theme of the debate is whether the color environment (object) exists out of the eye, and it is aimed at both the idealist and the realist.It is satisfied with three-phase because of reason, characterized by the use of simple alternative language.As to the explanation of "self-promise" in Jinjizhong, he thought that "self-approval" was the "recognition of color" of the "discerning" sect.Voyeurism is rather far-fetched, because whether the color environment itself is a dispute between the two sides, there is no need to "allow" as "eye color recognition", otherwise there is begging for the topic of suspicion.In addition, "self-approbation" is not a simple distinction between "the eye and the eye", because the word "photo" should be understood as the meaning of "inclusion", so that on the one hand it corresponds to the previous photograph.On the other hand, the object is not included in the eye root is also agreed by both the enemy, no need to add "self-approval."After ruling out the above statement, the simple alternative word "self-approbation" can only be added to the first half of the "junior high school photo", and its function is to redefine the scope of the discussion of the ratio, that is, to discuss only the three elements of color context, eye recognition and eye root.The relationship between eye recognition and color environment must be inseparable and belong to each other.However, the limitation of this approach lies in the narrow scope of discussion.
【作者单位】：上海大学社会科学学部哲学系;
【分类号】：B946.3

【相似文献】