慧皎《高僧传》研究
发布时间:2018-05-12 12:40
本文选题:慧皎 + 《高僧传》 ; 参考:《复旦大学》2006年博士论文
【摘要】: 本文的研究范围主要集中在《梁传》及相关文献的文献学研究,这里包括对《梁传》成书的研究,以及《梁传》与外典的比较等等,希望通过此文的写作分析出佛教史学与普通意义上外典历史学的异同,并总结出一些较有规律性的特点。另外对于《梁传》中的神异记述,本文也作一些社会学的梳理,以求对佛教历史中这种较为普遍的现象做出较为客观的评述。论文共分为引言、四章正文和三个相关的附录。 引言部分分为两节,第一节讨论的是关于本文研究的缘起、范围、目的等问题,以便对本文的研究范围作一个大致的界定。第二节是研究综述,此节主要是追溯性地记录在过去的一个世纪里国内外对慧皎《高僧传》的相关研究情况,并总结出其中的经验教训。 第一章《梁传》的作者研究。本章分为六节,第一节生平研究,此节一个重点就是讨论了慧皎《高僧传》卷末对研究慧皎生平极为重要的僧果跋尾的真伪问题。第二节对慧皎的著述以及从中反映出的问题作了一些考订。第三节考察了《梁传》撰写的时间问题。第四节则着重讨论了慧皎作为一个没有多少地位的律学沙门这一特殊身份对其编撰的影响。第五节是探讨了本书的大乘立场。第六节研究了由于南北割据而使本书具有的南方文史环境下特殊之处 第二章《梁传》的文本研究,本章共分为五节。第一节《高僧传》的题名,考察了慧皎对于“高僧”这一概念特别强调背后的个人乃至宗教目的。第二节是关于《高僧传》的版本研究,主要讨论汤用彤整理本的珍贵经验和值得改进的地方,,和《高丽藏》本《高僧传》的一些问题,此节的主要目的是为以后进一步整理作理论上的准备。第三节和第四节分别是追溯历代目录学著作对本书的著录情况以及本书各种不同版本的分卷。第五节研究的是《高僧传》分科在结构上的合理性以及各科人数的统计情况。最后一节研究的是《高僧传》中记录的部分传主名称方面的相关问题。 第三章《高僧传》与早期传记类资料之史源学研究,此章研究的主体是《高僧传》与早期一些别传、总传、碑铭等传记类资料的相关性。主要目的是对《高僧传》资料采撷的标准作一些史源学分析,以求对慧皎时代的佛教传记资料作一种概括性研究。 第四章是对《高僧传》的总体评述,第一节是对《高僧传》史学上的探讨,并做一些材料上的修订。第二节是对《高僧传》与道宣《续高僧传》史料重叠部分作的史料分析,除了文献上的意义外,也可以看出本书对后代的影响。第三节是探讨《高僧传》中的一些要素在后代以文本和非文本形式的流传。第四节则是对《高僧传》在文学艺术上成功的关键作一点简单的描述。 附录一是对《高僧传》史学背景的分析,主要讨论的是慧皎所处的时代中史学的发展情况,以及这种史学的特点在《高僧传》中的体现。 附录二是《高僧传》的史地类史源研究,鉴于慧皎编撰本书时曾参考了大量外典历史学著作,本章就比较了在慧皎以前的一些重要历史著作与《高僧传》之间的联系。 附录三是原来计划中社会人类学的一部分整理出来的稿件,主要是研究《高僧传》中的神异及其背后所反映的宗教人类学意义。另外一个方面就是《高僧传》中的法术的分类学分析。以上两个方面都只完成了整个体系中的一小部分,故而只是作为附录。
[Abstract]:The scope of this study is mainly focused on the bibliography of "Liang Zhuan >" and related literature, including the study of "Liang Zhuan > book" and the comparison between "Liang Zhuan >" with the foreign code and so on. The author hopes to analyze the similarities and differences between the Buddhist history and the common historical history through the writing of this article, and summarize some more regular characteristics. In order to make a more objective review of this common phenomenon in the history of Buddhism, this article is divided into an introduction, four chapters and three related appendices.
The first section is divided into two sections. The first section discusses the origin, scope and purpose of this study, so as to make a general definition of the scope of this study. The second section is a summary of the research. This section is mainly traced back to the relevant research on Hui Jiao < Gao monk 'in the past century, and summarized it. Out of the lessons.
The first chapter is the author of Liang Zhuan. This chapter is divided into six sections. The first section is a study of life and peace. This section focuses on the discussion of the true and false questions of the end of the Buddhist monks and fruits, which are very important to the study of Hui Jiao's life. The second section has made some studies on the writings of Hui Jiao and the problems reflected in it. The third section inspected the writing of "Liang Zhuan >" The fourth section focuses on the influence of Hui Jiao as a special status law sand gate. The fifth is to discuss the Mahayana position of this book. The sixth section studies the special features of this book in the Southern Literary and history environment because of the South and North separations.
The text of the second chapter, "Liang Zhuan >", is divided into five sections. The first section, the title of the high monk's biography, examines Hui Jiao's special emphasis on the individual and the religious purpose behind the concept of "high monk". The second section is about the study of the version of the Zhuan monk's biography. The main purpose of this section is to prepare for further theoretical preparation. The third and fourth sections are traced to the description of the book by the bibliographic works of the past dynasties and the classification of various versions of this book. The fifth section studies the rationality of the "high Monk Biography" and the structure of the Division. The last section deals with some issues related to the name of some of the biographies recorded in the monks' biography.
The third chapter, the history of the biography of Gao monk and early biography, the main body of this chapter is the correlation between the biography of the high monk and the early biography, the general biography, the inscription and so on. The main purpose is to make some historical sources analysis on the standard of the collection of the high monk's biography, in order to make a generality to the Buddhist biography data of the Hui Jiao era. Research.
The fourth chapter is the general comment on the Zhuan monk's biography. The first section is the study of the history of the high monk's biography and the revision of some materials. The second section is the historical analysis of the overlapping part of the high monk's biography and Taoism, and the historical data of the continued high monk's biography. In addition to the significance of the literature, the influence of the book to the descendants is also seen. The third section is to discuss the monk. Some of the elements in the biography are circulated in the form of text and non text in the descendants. The fourth section is a simple description of the key to the success of the high monk's biography in literature and art.
Appendix 1 is an analysis of the historical background of the Zhuan monk's biography, mainly discussing the development of the history in the era of Hui Jiao and the embodiment of the characteristics of this history in the biography of the high monks.
Appendix two is a historical source study of the history and land of the Zhuan monk. In view of his reference to a large number of works of history, Hui Jiao made a comparison of some of the important historical works of Hui Jiao and the link between the high monk's biography.
Appendix three is a part of the manuscript of Social Anthropology in the original plan, mainly the study of the religious anthropological significance reflected in the biography of the high monk and the religious anthropological significance behind it. The other is the taxonomic analysis of the magic in the Zhuan monk's biography. All of the above two aspects are finished only in a small part of the whole system. It's an appendix.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:B949
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 金建锋;;从释赞宁身份看《宋高僧传》的编撰性质[J];湖州师范学院学报;2011年03期
2 曾礼军;刘伙根;;异端与信仰——从《太平广记》“异僧”小说看佛教文化[J];井冈山学院学报;2009年01期
3 宋兴杰;;南北朝社会与《高僧传》[J];青年文学家;2013年30期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 曾礼军;《太平广记》研究[D];上海师范大学;2008年
2 金建锋;释赞宁《宋高僧传》研究[D];上海师范大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 王战睿;《高僧传》研究[D];陕西师范大学;2011年
2 郑培娟;魏晋南北朝志怪小说中的方士类型研究[D];暨南大学;2012年
3 赵晶;《高僧传》神异描写研究[D];河南师范大学;2013年
本文编号:1878654
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/1878654.html