南北朝隋唐时期的报应观研究
本文选题:报应观 + 南北朝隋唐 ; 参考:《华东师范大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:善恶报应观念由来已久,直至科学日益发达的今天,大多数人们仍然在有意或无意中将善恶自有报作为为人处世的信念和准则。中国本土报应观主要有两种,传统儒家报应观和道教“承负说”,而佛教东传所带来的佛教报应观念,在南北朝隋唐时期日渐流行,在冲击与丰富中国本土报应观的同时,佛教报应观也做了一些适应中土人文的调整,最终形成了中国佛教报应观。广泛流传于社会上的报应观念,与以上种种报应观都有着千丝万缕的联系,因而在佛教日渐兴盛的南北朝隋唐时代不可避免地发生了某些变化。 本文以富含南北朝隋唐时代的报应故事的社会史料《太平广记》为切入点,力图展现那一时代的报应观念及其演变趋势。 本文主要包括以下内容: 第一章:绪论。主要归纳学术界对于报应观念的研究成果和不足,指出本文撰写的主要目标,即探讨南北朝至隋唐时期报应观念的主要内容及其变化。 第二章:统计。统计《太平广记》报应故事及其所引文献资料的书名、作者、成书年代和现存情况,为第三章和第四章分析演变趋势提供量化数据。 第三章:以报应方式为切入点,考察南北朝隋唐时期报应观的内容及其演变。以《广记》报应故事为主要分析对象,注重探讨报应方式及其演变趋势。报应方式分为加报主力和报应时空(其中又包含报应对象)两方面,隋唐较之南北朝,一方面将法律增加为加报主力之一,另一方面将报应时空无限制延伸,以及将报应对象聚焦于行为者本人。 第四章:通过考察业因、业报与报应、消报的内容及演变情况,阐述南北朝报应观的主要内容及演变趋势。以《广记》报应故事为主要分析对象,注重挖掘“业”的内容及其背后暗含的时代善恶观念,即人们渐渐将佛教戒律化和儒家伦理化作为善恶评判的标准。同时,对于消报方式也做了一定的研究,认为消报观念主要受佛教影响。 第五章:结语。归纳文章报应观念的主要内容及演变趋势,本文报应观念主要涉及报应方式、业因内容以及消报方式,通过对这三类的分析比较,得出南北朝隋唐时期报应观念有着明显的佛教化趋向。
[Abstract]:The concept of retribution for good and evil has a long history, until today, when science is increasingly developed, most people still intentionally or unintentionally take the good and evil as the faith and criterion of dealing with the world. There are mainly two kinds of local retribution in China, the traditional Confucian retribution and Taoism "bearing the burden", and the Buddhist retribution concept brought about by Buddhism spreading to the east became more and more popular in the Sui and Tang dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties. At the same time, it impacted and enriched the local retribution view in China. Buddhist retribution also made some adjustments adapted to Chinese culture, and finally formed the Chinese Buddhist retribution. The concept of retribution, which is widely spread in the society, is inextricably linked with the above ideas of retribution, which inevitably changed during the Sui and Tang dynasties, when Buddhism flourished. Based on the social historical data of the retribution stories of the Sui and Tang dynasties in the Southern and Northern dynasties, the article tries to show the concept of retribution and its evolution trend in that period. This paper mainly includes the following contents: Chapter one: introduction. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the main contents and changes of the concept of retribution from the Southern and Northern dynasties to the Sui and Tang dynasties. Chapter two: statistics. The title, author, age of the book and the present situation of the retribution story and its cited documents provide quantitative data for the third and fourth chapters to analyze the trend of evolution. Chapter three: from the perspective of retribution, the content and evolution of retribution in Sui and Tang dynasties are investigated. Taking the retribution story of Guang Ji as the main object of analysis, the paper probes into the retribution mode and its evolution trend. The way of retribution is divided into two aspects: the main force of retribution and the time and space of retribution (which also includes the object of retribution). Compared with the Southern and Northern dynasties, Sui and Tang dynasties increased the law to one of the main forces of the retribution, and on the other hand extended the retribution time and space without restriction. And focusing the retribution object on the actor himself. Chapter four: through the investigation of the cause of business, the content and evolution of the retribution, the paper expounds the main content and the evolution trend of the retribution in the Southern and Northern dynasties. Taking the retribution story of Guang Ji as the main object of analysis, the author pays attention to excavating the content of "karma" and the concept of good and evil implied behind it, that is, people gradually regard Buddhist precepts and Confucian ethics as the criteria for judging good and evil. At the same time, the way of eliminating newspaper is also studied, and it is believed that the idea of eliminating newspaper is mainly influenced by Buddhism. Chapter five: conclusion. The paper summarizes the main content and evolution trend of the concept of retribution in this paper, which mainly involves the retribution mode, the content of cause and the way of eliminating the newspaper, through the analysis and comparison of these three kinds of ideas. It is concluded that the retribution concept in the Sui and Tang dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties has an obvious trend of Buddhism.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:K239;K24;B949
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭淑新;;慧远的“因果报应”论新诠[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2010年05期
2 张树卿;张洋;;儒、释、道的报应观比较研究[J];白城师范学院学报;2007年02期
3 牛延锋;;解读方立天先生的佛教文化内涵——以因果报应思想为例[J];保定师范专科学校学报;2007年03期
4 童光侠;《佛说盂兰盆经》与《目连救母变文》[J];敦煌学辑刊;1990年01期
5 孟强;武氏祠天帝降罚图浅析──兼谈汉代善恶报应思想[J];东南文化;2001年05期
6 李懿;;从《太平广记》之仙境描写看道教的世俗化趋势[J];大众文艺(理论);2008年10期
7 王丽;;道德的感召与神鬼的威吓——“三言”中的伦理观和果报观[J];大众文艺;2011年08期
8 罗颢;;传统报应说与佛教因果报应理论比观[J];法音;1990年09期
9 黄云鹤;唐代举子游丐之风——《太平广记》所见唐代举子生活态之一[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2004年01期
10 李小荣;试论敦煌变文业报轮回之佛教思想的来源及表现[J];楚雄师专学报;1999年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 焦杰;戴绿红;雷巧玲;;从《太平广记》中的仙女下凡故事看唐代的道教观念[A];唐史论丛(第九辑)[C];2006年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 曾礼军;《太平广记》研究[D];上海师范大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 郑宗言;《太平经》中的承负思想[D];安徽大学;2007年
2 熊红艳;承负说与因果报应论的比较分析[D];西南大学;2008年
3 陈慧宇;敦煌变文中的佛教“果报观念”[D];湘潭大学;2008年
4 刘畅;《太平广记》报应故事研究[D];陕西师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:1966992
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/1966992.html