非奴婢而是被收养人:敦煌文书中“恩子”的身份
发布时间：2018-10-17 11:16
【摘要】：敦煌及吐鲁番出土文书是研究中国中古西部寺院经济的最佳文献,其中尤以寺院籍账最为珍贵。籍账中记载了寺院各种僧俗劳力的工作任务和他们从寺院获得劳动所得的粮食分量及其他福利。这些获得配粮和福利的人口中就包括"恩子"。现有的研究认为,"恩子"仅仅是人名,而他们的社会属性是奴婢。在此,以梳理和诠释文献的方法,通过检查和分析所有含有"恩子"一词的敦煌文书,发现其中存在有姓和无姓两种形式的"恩子",而且没有明显证据表明他们的身份是奴婢。然后再通过仔细解读一份《收养契》样本,最后推论,"恩子"是寺院收养的少年男女,并不属于奴婢阶层。
[Abstract]:The documents unearthed from Dunhuang and Turpan are the best documents to study the economy of monasteries in the western part of China, especially the books of monasteries. The book records the work of the monastic labors and the amount of food and other benefits they receive from the work of the monasteries. These people who receive food and benefits include the "Eunzi". According to existing studies, Eunzi is only a person's name, and their social attribute is a slave. In this paper, by means of combing and interpreting the literature, by examining and analyzing all Dunhuang documents containing the word "Eunzi", it is found that there are two forms of "Eunzi" with or without surname, and there is no obvious evidence that their status is a slave. Then, by carefully interpreting a sample of adoptive deeds, it was concluded that Eunzi was a young man and woman adopted in monasteries and not in the slave class.
【作者单位】： 上海大学文学院;
【分类号】：B949;K23
本文编号：2276481
[Abstract]:The documents unearthed from Dunhuang and Turpan are the best documents to study the economy of monasteries in the western part of China, especially the books of monasteries. The book records the work of the monastic labors and the amount of food and other benefits they receive from the work of the monasteries. These people who receive food and benefits include the "Eunzi". According to existing studies, Eunzi is only a person's name, and their social attribute is a slave. In this paper, by means of combing and interpreting the literature, by examining and analyzing all Dunhuang documents containing the word "Eunzi", it is found that there are two forms of "Eunzi" with or without surname, and there is no obvious evidence that their status is a slave. Then, by carefully interpreting a sample of adoptive deeds, it was concluded that Eunzi was a young man and woman adopted in monasteries and not in the slave class.
【作者单位】： 上海大学文学院;
【分类号】：B949;K23
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨际平;敦煌文书安环清卖地契的性质和年代——与余也非先生商榷[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1983年04期
2 朱斌权;;从敦煌文书看唐代“中女”问题[J];唐山师范学院学报;2011年01期
3 王岩华;;从敦煌文书浅析唐代和离制度[J];科学之友(B版);2008年12期
4 张泽洪;;敦煌文书中的唐代道经[J];敦煌学辑刊;1993年02期
5 陆离;敦煌文书中的博士与教授[J];敦煌学辑刊;1999年01期
6 惠媛;;从敦煌文书看唐人婚嫁问题[J];沧桑;2010年04期
7 ;从敦煌文书谈晚唐五代的“地子”[J];历史研究;1996年03期
8 黄正建;敦煌文书中《相书》残卷与唐代的相面——唐代占卜之二[J];敦煌学辑刊;1988年Z1期
9 林世田;;《敦煌社会经济文献真迹释录》出版[J];文献;1991年01期
10 曹旅宁;从敦煌文书看唐代的岭南[J];广东社会科学;1988年04期
，本文编号：2276481
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/2276481.html
