《天主实义》的今注与新评——读《天主实义今注》
发布时间：2018-10-26 21:07
【摘要】：正近几年来,有关明清之际中西文化交流史的研究似乎安静了些。学术诚然不是热闹凑出来的,但不可否认的是,学术确有其发展的内在理路,高低有致、扬伏有时实属常态。如若回顾以往研究,我们大可承认,每一波的新著迭出在很大程度上建基于新史料的挖掘、新视角的审视以及新方法的应用。令人欣慰的是,学界中人并没有蛰伏而休,而是不约而同地投身到史料的搜集、整理、忹译等基础性工作中。书目采编提要、原
[Abstract]:In recent years, the study on the history of Chinese and Western cultural exchange between Ming and Qing dynasties seems to be quieter. It is true that learning is not huddled together, but it is undeniable that it has its own inner path of development, and sometimes it is normal. If we look back on previous studies, we can admit that each wave of new works is based to a great extent on the excavation of new historical materials, the examination of new perspectives and the application of new methods. It is gratifying to note that the academic community has not been dormant, but devoted itself to the collection, collation, translation and other basic work of historical materials. Bibliographic Abstract, original
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：2016年度《广州大典》与广州历史文化研究专项课题(项目批准号:2016GZY10)资助
【分类号】：B978
本文编号：2296945
[Abstract]:In recent years, the study on the history of Chinese and Western cultural exchange between Ming and Qing dynasties seems to be quieter. It is true that learning is not huddled together, but it is undeniable that it has its own inner path of development, and sometimes it is normal. If we look back on previous studies, we can admit that each wave of new works is based to a great extent on the excavation of new historical materials, the examination of new perspectives and the application of new methods. It is gratifying to note that the academic community has not been dormant, but devoted itself to the collection, collation, translation and other basic work of historical materials. Bibliographic Abstract, original
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：2016年度《广州大典》与广州历史文化研究专项课题(项目批准号:2016GZY10)资助
【分类号】：B978
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 刘秉虎;王可芬;;试论《天主实义》对朝鲜实学的形成所产生的影响[J];大连大学学报;2013年01期
2 张晓林;《天主实义》的天佛(道)对话[J];西北师大学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
3 谭杰;;《天主实义》之成书过程再考辨[J];北京行政学院学报;2013年04期
4 张晓林;戴震的“讳言”——论《天主实义》与《孟子字义疏证》之关系[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年04期
，本文编号：2296945
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/2296945.html
