韦伯《儒教与道教》引用有关中国文献略考
发布时间：2019-04-20 08:36
【摘要】：本文通过对马克斯·韦伯《儒教与道教》一书中明确出注引用的有关中国文献的较系统考察,主要说明部分学者因韦伯不通中文遂轻视其研究之价值,笼统批评有责人过苛之嫌。韦伯引用的文献并不限于少数先秦经典和《通鉴纲目》,而是尽可能地利用了包括敦煌文书在内的最新外文成果;并且韦伯的解读有着现代社会科学的综合深刻视角。至于其著作在文献方面受到的诟病,则可以从其与葛兰言、陈寅恪等学者的对比中,归纳出一些可能的历史语境原因。韦伯在世界宗教社会学比较背景下进行的中国宗教研究,其理论启发价值大大超过具体文献失误的不足。
[Abstract]:Through a systematic investigation of the Chinese literature cited in Max Weber's book Confucianism and Taoism, this paper mainly explains that some scholars despise the value of their research because Weber is unable to use Chinese. There is a suspicion of blaming people for being too harsh in general criticism. The documents cited by Weber are not limited to a few pre-Qin classics and Compendium of Compendium, but make use of the latest foreign language achievements, including Dunhuang documents, as far as possible, and Weber's interpretation has a comprehensive and profound perspective of modern social sciences. As for the criticism of his works in literature, we can sum up some possible historical context reasons from his comparison with Gran Yan, Chen Yinke and other scholars. Weber's study of Chinese religion under the background of world religious sociology comparison, its theoretical enlightening value greatly exceeds the deficiency of concrete literature error.
【作者单位】： 北京大学政府管理学院;
【分类号】：B222;B958
本文编号：2461455
[Abstract]:Through a systematic investigation of the Chinese literature cited in Max Weber's book Confucianism and Taoism, this paper mainly explains that some scholars despise the value of their research because Weber is unable to use Chinese. There is a suspicion of blaming people for being too harsh in general criticism. The documents cited by Weber are not limited to a few pre-Qin classics and Compendium of Compendium, but make use of the latest foreign language achievements, including Dunhuang documents, as far as possible, and Weber's interpretation has a comprehensive and profound perspective of modern social sciences. As for the criticism of his works in literature, we can sum up some possible historical context reasons from his comparison with Gran Yan, Chen Yinke and other scholars. Weber's study of Chinese religion under the background of world religious sociology comparison, its theoretical enlightening value greatly exceeds the deficiency of concrete literature error.
【作者单位】： 北京大学政府管理学院;
【分类号】：B222;B958
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 莫国香;阎莉;;《儒教与道教》一书之逻辑结构分析——解读韦伯中国社会学基础与儒、道教的关系[J];吉林省教育学院学报(学科版);2008年09期
2 李丹;;一夜昙花——读韦伯的《儒教与道教》[J];科技信息;2009年27期
3 卢宁;;浅议《儒教与道教》中传统中国的社会发展[J];河南财政税务高等专科学校学报;2013年01期
4 刘清平;;“理性”抑或“情理”? 读马克斯·韦伯的《儒教与道教》[J];博览群书;2003年12期
5 孙亦平;;“即世而超越”:论道教的出世与入世——读马克斯·韦伯《儒教与道教》[J];深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年02期
6 朱玉霞;;中西宗教文化审美[J];佳木斯教育学院学报;2012年05期
7 金碧漪;赵锋;;从《儒教与道教》浅析韦伯眼中中国的资本主义[J];法制与社会;2011年26期
8 刘琦婧;赵鑫;;对韦伯“中国命题”的解读[J];新闻世界;2010年06期
9 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 何蓉;从另一个视角看中国社会[N];中华读书报;2007年
2 中国社会科学院社会学所副研究员 何蓉;今读韦伯《中国的宗教》[N];中华读书报;2008年
，本文编号：2461455
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/2461455.html
