思维之异与会通之法
发布时间：2019-06-15 12:24
【摘要】： 无论是在宗教信仰中,还是在哲学形而上学的讨论中,“上帝存在的证明”在西方都有着重要的地位。而对于十六世纪入华,志在“中华归主”的耶稣会士而言,这不仅是一个神学或哲学命题,更是一个首要的实践问题。本文选择明末清初中文宣教文献中“上帝存在的证明”作为切入点,通过与其原型——代表西方思维模式的阿奎那的五个证明相比较,凸显出双方就同一命题所作论证的差异,进一步分析这些差异背后的原因,并据此指出中国思维方式的特点所在。在厘清中西思维模式各自的特点之后,文章将着手解决这样一个问题:迥异的两种思维模式是否存在彼此理解、彼此交流的可能。本文将通过对传教士外文书信和著述的考察,并结合那个时代中国主流智识人的回应来证明答案是肯定的。最后,文章再次聚焦于中文上帝存在的证明,从传教士对西方材料的处理上挖掘沟通两种思维模式的可行性方案。
[Abstract]:Whether in religious belief or in the discussion of philosophical metaphysics, the proof of God's existence plays an important role in the West. For Jesuits who entered China in the 16th century and aspire to "return to the Lord of China", this is not only a theological or philosophical proposition, but also a primary practical problem. This paper selects "proof of God's existence" in Chinese propaganda literature at the end of Ming Dynasty and early Qing Dynasty as the starting point, and by comparing with its prototype, Aquinas, which represents the western mode of thinking, highlights the differences between the two sides on the same proposition, further analyzes the reasons behind these differences, and points out the characteristics of Chinese mode of thinking. After clarifying the characteristics of the Chinese and Western modes of thinking, the article will begin to solve the problem of whether the two different modes of thinking have the possibility of understanding and communicating with each other. This paper will prove that the answer is yes through the investigation of missionaries' foreign letters and works, and combined with the response of the mainstream wise people in China at that time. Finally, the paper focuses again on the proof of the existence of Chinese God and excavates the feasibility of communication between the two modes of thinking from the missionaries' handling of western materials.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：B978
本文编号：2500204
[Abstract]:Whether in religious belief or in the discussion of philosophical metaphysics, the proof of God's existence plays an important role in the West. For Jesuits who entered China in the 16th century and aspire to "return to the Lord of China", this is not only a theological or philosophical proposition, but also a primary practical problem. This paper selects "proof of God's existence" in Chinese propaganda literature at the end of Ming Dynasty and early Qing Dynasty as the starting point, and by comparing with its prototype, Aquinas, which represents the western mode of thinking, highlights the differences between the two sides on the same proposition, further analyzes the reasons behind these differences, and points out the characteristics of Chinese mode of thinking. After clarifying the characteristics of the Chinese and Western modes of thinking, the article will begin to solve the problem of whether the two different modes of thinking have the possibility of understanding and communicating with each other. This paper will prove that the answer is yes through the investigation of missionaries' foreign letters and works, and combined with the response of the mainstream wise people in China at that time. Finally, the paper focuses again on the proof of the existence of Chinese God and excavates the feasibility of communication between the two modes of thinking from the missionaries' handling of western materials.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：B978
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 崔娟;晚明士人的文化适应和信仰抉择[D];暨南大学;2011年
，本文编号：2500204
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/2500204.html
