环评审批的司法审查之困境与克服

发布时间：2018-01-21 10:47

  本文关键词： 环评审批 司法审查 建设项目环评 行政诉讼　出处：《政治与法律》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：环评审批是环保部门依职权作出的具有高度科技专业性的行政行为,法院如何审查高度科技专业性行政行为值得关注。通过分析我国的62起环评行政诉讼案件可以发现:在实体审查方面,法院往往以欠缺相关的知识与技术为由,采取尊重行政机关的专业性判断的态度;在程序审查方面,法院仅审查程序是否形式合法,而不过问程序是否实质合法或是否正当。司法审查的退让使得针对环评审批的司法监督名存实亡,环评审批权在"科技专业性"的遮掩下不断被滥用。为制约行政权,确保环评预防环境污染与生态破坏功能的发挥,法院应将审查的重点放在程序上,在程序审查中遵循正当行政程序标准,同时,亦应在实体审查中确立合理性审查标准。
[Abstract]:EIA examination and approval is a highly scientific and professional administrative act made by the environmental protection department in accordance with its authority. By analyzing 62 administrative litigation cases of environmental impact assessment in China, it can be found that: in the aspect of entity review. Courts often take the attitude of respecting the professional judgment of administrative organs on the basis of lack of relevant knowledge and technology; In the aspect of procedural review, the court only reviews whether the procedure is legal, but not whether the procedure is actually legal or legitimate. The concession of judicial review makes the judicial supervision of EIA examination and approval exist in name. In order to restrict the administrative power and ensure the function of environmental impact assessment to prevent environmental pollution and ecological destruction, the court should focus on the procedure. The standard of due administrative procedure should be followed in the examination of procedure, and the standard of reasonableness should also be established in the examination of entity.
【作者单位】： 常州大学史良法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“环境影响评价的司法审查研究”(项目编号:13XFX010)的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D922.68;D925.3
【正文快照】： 环境损害一旦发生,往往难以消除和恢复或者虽能消除和恢复但耗资巨大。环境影响评价(以下简称:环评)作为从源头预防和减轻环境污染的“阀门”,是环境保护法的重要制度。(1)在大部分国家和地区环评文件是由建设单位编制的情形下,势必需要一道对环评文件进行行政审批的控制程序，

本文编号：1451277