当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 生态环境论文 >

贵州遵义松林Ni-Mo多金属矿区土壤砷、铊生态风险评价

发布时间:2018-10-07 18:33
【摘要】:本研究对贵州遵义松林Ni-Mo多金属矿区表层土壤(旱地土和水稻土)和主要农作物(粮食类和蔬菜类)进行系统采样,采用ICP-MS分析土壤样品中重金属As和Tl的含量,及农作物样品中Tl的含量。通过地质累积指数和潜在生态风险指数评价矿区土壤As和Tl污染状况及生态危害,并利用危险商法(HQ)评价直接摄入农作物对当地居民造成的Tl健康风险。主要研究结论如下:(1)矿区旱地土样品As含量范围为16.7~185 mg·kg~(-1),平均值为59.7mg·kg~(-1);水稻土样品As含量范围为6.4~44.6 mg·kg~(-1),平均值为22.4 mg·kg~(-1)。矿区旱地土样品Tl含量范围为1.04~4.69 mg·kg~(-1),平均值为2.11 mg·kg~(-1);水稻土样品Tl含量范围为1.12~1.93 mg·kg~(-1),平均值为1.57 mg·kg~(-1);(2)矿区6种农作物样品Tl含量的变化范围为0.0162~1.059 mg·kg~(-1)。粮食类作物(水稻、玉米、甘薯)的Tl含量均值为0.111 mg·kg~(-1),蔬菜类作物(白菜、辣椒、萝卜)的Tl含量均值为0.394 mg·kg~(-1)。(3)地质累积指数法的评价结果表明,矿区旱地土As的评价等级为无污染、轻度污染、中等污染、中度污染—重污染的样品分别占9.1%、13.6%、54.5%、18.2%、4.6%;矿区水稻土As的评价等级为无污染、轻度污染、中等污染的样品分别占41.7%、41.7%、16.6%。矿区旱地土Tl的评价等级为无污染、轻度污染、中等污染、中度污染—重污染的样品分别占5%、59%、27%、9%;矿区水稻土样品Tl的评价等级均为轻度污染。(4)潜在生态风险指数法的评价结果表明,矿区旱地土As的评价等级为轻微生态危害、中等生态危害、强生态危害的样品分别占45.5%、45.5%、9%;矿区水稻土As的评价等级均为轻微生态危害。矿区旱地土Tl的评价等级为中等生态危害、强生态危害、很强生态危害的样品分别占18%、64%、18%;矿区水稻土样品Tl的评价等级为中等生态危害和强生态危害的样品分别占33%和67%。(5)健康风险指数法的评价结果显示,辣椒、玉米、水稻的Tl健康风险指数小于1,不会引起人体健康风险;萝卜、白菜、甘薯的水稻的Tl健康风险指数大于1,长期食用会对人体造成一定程度的健康风险;6种农作物Tl健康风险排序为白菜萝卜甘薯水稻辣椒玉米。本研究的上述评价结果表明,矿区旱地土和水稻土中As和Tl已可能受到牛蹄塘组底部黑色页岩的风化及Ni-Mo矿产资源开采的影响,均存在一定程度的潜在生态风险。
[Abstract]:In this study, the surface soil (dryland soil and paddy soil) and main crops (grain and vegetables) in Ni-Mo polymetallic mining area of Zunyi pine forest in Guizhou province were systematically sampled. The contents of As and Tl in soil samples were analyzed by ICP-MS. And the content of Tl in crop samples. Through geological accumulation index and potential ecological risk index, the pollution status and ecological hazard of As and Tl in the soil of mining area were evaluated, and the Tl health risk caused by direct intake of crops to local residents was evaluated by (HQ). The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the range of As content in dryland soil of mining area is 16.7185 mg kg~ (-1), the average value is 59.7mg kg~ (-1), and the range of As content in paddy soil is 6.4 mg kg~ (-1) with an average of 22.4 mg kg~ (-1). The range of Tl content in dryland soil was 1.04 ~ 4.69 mg kg~ (-1), the average value was 2.11 mg kg~ (-1), and the range of Tl content in paddy soil was 1.120.93 mg kg~ (-1), and the average value was 1.57 mg kg~ (-1); (_ 2). The range of Tl content of 6 kinds of crop samples in mining area was 0.0162 ~ 2 ~ 1.059 mg kg~ (-1). The average Tl content of grain crops (rice, corn, sweet potato) was 0.111 mg kg~ (-1), and the average Tl content of vegetable crops (cabbage, pepper, radish) was 0.394 mg kg~ (-1). (3). The evaluation grade of As in dryland soil of mining area was no pollution, slight pollution, moderate pollution and heavy pollution, and the samples of medium pollution-heavy pollution accounted for 9.1C 13.6U 54.5N 18.2cm 4.6.The evaluation grade of As of paddy soil in mining area was non-pollution, mildly polluted, and the samples of moderate pollution accounted for 41.716.60.The results showed that the evaluation of As in dryland soil of mining area was non-polluted, slightly polluted, moderately polluted, and the moderately polluted samples accounted for 41.716.66% of the samples, respectively. The evaluation grade of Tl in dryland soil of mining area is no pollution, light pollution, moderate pollution, The Tl of paddy soil samples in mining area were all mild pollution. (4) the evaluation results of potential ecological risk index method showed that the evaluation grade of As in dryland soil of mining area was slight ecological hazard. The samples with strong ecological hazard accounted for 45.5%, and the As evaluation grade of paddy soil in mining area was slight ecological hazard. The evaluation grade of Tl in dryland soil of mining area is medium ecological hazard and strong ecological hazard. The samples with strong ecological hazards accounted for 18% and 18% respectively; the Tl of paddy soil samples from mining areas accounted for 33% and 67% of the samples with medium ecological hazard and strong ecological hazard respectively. (5) the results of the health risk index method showed that pepper and corn, The Tl health risk index of rice is less than 1, which does not cause human health risk. The Tl health risk index of sweet potato rice was more than 1, and the Tl health risk of 6 kinds of crops, namely cabbage, radish, sweet potato, rice, pepper and corn, caused a certain degree of health risk to human body after eating for a long time. The results of this study indicate that As and Tl in the dryland soil and paddy soil of the mining area may have been affected by the weathering of black shale at the bottom of Niulitang formation and the exploitation of Ni-Mo mineral resources, and there are some potential ecological risks.
【学位授予单位】:贵州师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:X53;X82

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 罗浪;刘明学;董发勤;向莎;张格格;宗美荣;杨刚;张倩;张伟;;某多金属矿周围牧区土壤重金属形态及环境风险评测[J];农业环境科学学报;2016年08期

2 杨玉敏;师学义;张琛;;基于内梅罗指数法的复垦村庄土壤重金属污染评价及空间分布[J];水土保持研究;2016年04期

3 王馨慧;单保庆;唐文忠;张超;王闯;;北京市凉水河表层沉积物中砷含量及其赋存形态[J];环境科学;2016年01期

4 郑琪;南铁贵;詹志来;袁媛;黄璐琦;;重金属快速检测技术在中药材质量控制中的应用[J];药物分析杂志;2015年11期

5 刘菊梅;栗利曼;沈渭寿;苗菲菲;王聪;刘海月;司万童;兰宗宝;;黄河包头段灌区玉米重金属污染及人群健康风险评价[J];南方农业学报;2015年09期

6 许世龙;陈秋平;石国宁;;铊在环境介质中的迁移机制及其对人体健康的影响[J];微量元素与健康研究;2015年03期

7 刘娟;王桉;解小凡;王萌萌;陈永亨;王津;吴静雯;曹慧敏;冯桂欢;方俊;江峰;;含铊废水微生物处理技术的研究进展[J];环境与健康杂志;2015年02期

8 赵庆令;李清彩;谢江坤;李元仲;姬永红;庞成宝;万淼;;应用富集系数法和地累积指数法研究济宁南部区域土壤重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J];岩矿测试;2015年01期

9 李晓婷;刘勇;王平;;基于支持向量机的城市土壤重金属污染评价[J];生态环境学报;2014年08期

10 麻冰涓;王海邻;李小超;张永慧;刘军;李东艳;;豫北典型农田作物中重金属污染状况及健康风险评价[J];生态环境学报;2014年08期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 苏超;基于支持向量机的太原市土壤重金属污染评价研究[D];山西大学;2014年

2 许金朵;基于GIS的金华市区土壤重金属含量空间分布与污染评价研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年

3 冯锦霞;基于GIS与地统计学的土壤重金属元素空间变异分析[D];中南大学;2007年



本文编号:2255245

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2255245.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d86ea***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com