当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 生态环境论文 >

烟花爆竹燃放对北京大气污染物和水溶性无机离子的影响

发布时间:2018-10-25 15:32
【摘要】:为了解春节期间烟花爆竹燃放对北京大气污染物和PM_(2.5)中水溶性无机离子贡献的影响,采用浓度特征对比、相关性分析等方法,对2011年2月1日—3月1日期间的PM_(10)、气态污染物、PM_(2.5)中水溶性无机离子浓度等在线数据进行了分析.结果表明:烟花爆竹的燃放会在短时间内加重PM_(10)颗粒物污染,集中燃放期(含除夕、春节、正月初五、元宵节)ρ(PM_(10))和φ(SO_2)(分别为232μg/m~3和40.2×10~(-9))是非集中燃放期(63μg/m~3和16.0×10~(-9))的3.7和2.5倍,燃放烟花爆竹对ρ(PM_(10))和φ(SO_2)的小时贡献率分别达到56.8%和35.6%;但对φ(CO)、φ(NO)、φ(NO2)无显著影响.而观测期间由其他因素导致的污染期ρ(PM_(10))和各气态污染物小时体积分数有所增加,分别是非集中燃放期的3.0~8.3倍.燃放烟花爆竹对PM_(2.5)中ρ(Mg~(2+))、ρ(K~+)、ρ(Cl~-)的影响最大,分别为非集中燃放期的65.0、31.6、6.9倍,贡献率分别为88.6%、87.2%、65.8%.ρ(Mg~(2+))、ρ(K~+)与ρ(Cl~-)在集中燃放期表现出较高的相关性(R0.9).污染期ρ(SO_4~(2-))、ρ(NO_3~-)、ρ(NH_4~+)明显升高,分别为非集中燃放期的3.8、16.4、8.3倍,同时高于集中燃放期(分别为2.7、2.5、2.1倍).集中燃放期PM_(2.5)中主要以NH_4HSO_4、NH_4NO_3、KNO_3、KCl、NH_4Cl、MgCl_2等形式存在.集中燃放期硫氧化物转化率(SOR)高于非集中燃放期和污染期,而氮氧化物转化率(NOR)则是污染期最高.研究显示,燃放烟花爆竹对ρ(PM_(10))及PM_(2.5)中ρ(Mg~(2+))、ρ(K~+)、ρ(Cl~-)影响最大,污染期各离子浓度均有大幅升高,NOR在污染期的高值是导致ρ(NO_3~-)升高的重要原因.
[Abstract]:In order to understand the effect of fireworks and firecrackers on the contribution of atmospheric pollutants and water-soluble inorganic ions in PM_ _ (2.5) in Beijing during the Spring Festival, concentration characteristics were compared and correlation analysis was used. The online data of PM_ (10), gaseous pollutants and water soluble inorganic ions in PM_ (2.5) from February 1 to March 1, 2011 were analyzed. The results showed that the discharge of fireworks and firecrackers would aggravate the pollution of PM_ (10) particles in a short time. The concentration discharge period (including New Year's Eve, Spring Festival, the fifth day of the first month, the Lantern Festival) 蟻 (PM_ (10) and 蠁 (SO_2) (232 渭 g/m~3 and 40.2 脳 10 ~ (-9) were 3.7 and 2.5 times higher than those of the non-centralized discharge periods (63 渭 g/m~3 and 16.0 脳 10 ~ (-9), respectively). The contribution rates of fireworks to 蟻 (PM_ (10) and 蠁 (SO_2) reached 56.8% and 35.6%, respectively, but had no significant effect on 蠁 (CO), 蠁 (NO), 蠁 (NO2). During the observed period, 蟻 (PM_ _ (10) and the hourly volume fraction of each gaseous pollutant increased, which were 3. 0 ~ 8. 3 times as much as that of the non-concentrated discharge period, respectively. The effect of setting off fireworks on 蟻 (Mg~ (2), 蟻 (K~), 蟻 (Cl~-) in PM_ _ (2. 5) was the greatest, which was 65.0 / 31.66.9 times of that of non-concentrated discharge period, respectively, and the contribution rate was 87.2 / 65.8. 蟻 (Mg~ (2), 蟻 (K~) and 蟻 (Cl~-) showed a higher correlation (R0.9) in the concentrated discharge period. The SO_4~ (2-), 蟻 (NO_3~-), 蟻 (NH_4~) in the pollution period was significantly higher than that in the non-centralized ignition stage, which was 8.3 times higher than that in the non-centralized ignition stage, and was higher than that in the centralized ignition period (2.7g / 2.52.1g, respectively). PM_ (2. 5) mainly exists in the form of NH_4HSO_4,NH_4NO_3,KNO_3,KCl,NH_4Cl,MgCl_2. The sulfur oxide conversion rate (SOR) in the concentrated combustion stage was higher than that in the non-centralized combustion stage and the pollution stage, while the nitrogen oxide conversion rate (NOR) was the highest in the pollution period. The results showed that the discharge of fireworks and firecrackers had the greatest influence on 蟻 (Mg~ (2), 蟻 (K ~), 蟻 (Cl~-) in 蟻 (PM_ (10) and PM_ (2.5), and the concentration of each ion increased significantly in the pollution period. The high value of NOR in the pollution period was the important reason for the increase of 蟻 (NO_3~-).
【作者单位】: 中国海洋大学海洋与大气学院;中国环境科学研究院环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室;
【基金】:国家“十三五”科技支撑计划项目(2014BAC23B01;2014BAC06B01)
【分类号】:X513

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陶俊;陈刚才;钟昌琴;;重庆市大气TSP中水溶性无机离子的化学特征[J];中国环境监测;2006年06期

2 赵亚南;王跃思;温天雪;戴冠华;;长白山PM_(2.5)中水溶性无机离子观测研究[J];环境化学;2011年04期

3 杨素霞;曹军骥;沈振兴;刘随心;张婷;王启元;强娟;李文韬;;西安冬、夏季PM_(2.5)中水溶性无机离子的变化特征[J];环境化学;2012年08期

4 杜晓燕,高俊杰,成琼,张渝,谢家理;无机离子交换材料对废水中铯的吸附研究[J];四川环境;2005年02期

5 古金霞;吴丽萍;霍光耀;白志鹏;杜世勇;刘爱霞;解以扬;;天津市PM_(2.5)中水溶性无机离子污染特征及来源分析[J];中国环境监测;2013年03期

6 黄科瑞;刘芳;;百色市右江区冬春季节大气PM_(10)中主要水溶性无机离子分析[J];安徽农业科学;2012年27期

7 刘立;胡辉;李娴;黄奂彦;蔡勋江;张国斐;;东莞市大气亚微米粒子PM_1及其中水溶性无机离子的污染特征[J];环境科学学报;2014年01期

8 刘芳;黄科瑞;;百色市右江区大气PM_(10)中水溶性无机离子的化学特征与来源[J];环境污染与防治;2012年06期

9 李薇,王怡中;无机离子对光催化水处理过程影响的研究进展[J];环境污染治理技术与设备;2004年03期

10 江姗姗;梅凡民;;离子色谱在气溶胶无机离子测定中的应用[J];环境科学与管理;2008年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 阿依先木·加拉力;和田市城区大气PM_(2.5)、PM_(1.0)中金属元素和水溶性无机离子季节性分布及来源解析[D];新疆大学;2015年

2 光武;武汉市某主干道PM_(2.5)中水溶性无机离子及金属元素特征[D];华中农业大学;2016年



本文编号:2294113

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2294113.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9bb3d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com