当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 生态环境论文 >

污水处理综合利用项目能值分析兼论滨海地区模式

发布时间:2019-05-13 23:10
【摘要】:污水处理系统在处理污水达标排放的同时消耗大量能源与资源,为科学评估污水处理系统综合利用效率及对自然-经济系统可持续发展的影响,本文以齐齐哈尔污水处理厂为例,应用能值分析原理和方法,通过选取不同的因子,对模型A(污水处理系统+锅炉取暖系统)、模型B(污水处理系统+锅炉取暖系统+分布式光伏电站系统)、模型C(污水处理系统+水源热泵取暖系统)和模型D(污水处理厂+水源热泵取暖系统+分布式光伏电站系统),进行能值对比,包括四个模型的能值流和三个能值评价指标(能值产出率、环境负载率、能值可持续发展指标),最终建立模型,并在滨海地区进行推广。论文取得如下成果和认识:(1)经过数据比对分析,污水厂在增加水源热泵取暖系统与分布式光伏电站设备后,综合应用系统能值和效率均优于单一的运行系统。因此积极探讨不同产业间的融合,不仅会产生经济收益,还能优化产业结构,提高生态效益。四个模型环境负载率均低于1,对环境压力较小,可持续发展指数均在1到10之间,从生态学角度可以得到推广。(2)从能值流角度分析,单纯考虑不可更新资源,C、D模型表现最优。单纯考虑资金投入C模型表现最优,单纯考虑产出,B、D模型表现最优。A、B模型对不可更新资源依赖程度更高,资源短缺地区适合使用C、D模型。B、D模型更加适合能源短缺,经济发达地区。A、C模型适合资源充足,经济欠发达地区。(3)从能值产出率高出模式、环境负载率、可持续发展指数三个角度对比,D模型最优,其次是模型C,能值产出率基本与模型A持平,环境负载率、可持续发展指数均高于模型A,模型A效率较高,但是对环境压力最大,模型B环境压力角度考虑优于模式A,但是产出率下降,综合可持续发展指数与模型A相比下降,从经济角度和生态角度综合考虑也不推荐选择。
[Abstract]:The sewage treatment system consumes a lot of energy and resources while meeting the discharge standards, in order to scientifically evaluate the comprehensive utilization efficiency of the sewage treatment system and its impact on the sustainable development of the natural-economic system. Taking Qiqihar sewage treatment Plant as an example, this paper applies the principle and method of emergy analysis, and selects different factors to model A (boiler heating system of sewage treatment system). Model B (sewage treatment system Boiler heating system distributed Photovoltaic Power Station system), Model C (water source heat pump heating system of sewage treatment system) and model D (distributed photovoltaic power station system of water source heat pump heating system of sewage treatment plant), and the emergy values are compared. It includes the emergy flow of four models and three emergy evaluation indexes (emergy output rate, environmental load rate, emergy sustainable development index). Finally, the model is established and popularized in coastal areas. The achievements and understandings of this paper are as follows: (1) after data comparison and analysis, after adding water source heat pump heating system and distributed photovoltaic power station equipment, the energy value and efficiency of the integrated application system are better than that of a single operation system. Therefore, actively discussing the integration of different industries will not only produce economic benefits, but also optimize the industrial structure and improve ecological benefits. The environmental load rate of the four models is less than 1, the environmental pressure is small, and the sustainable development index is between 1 and 10, which can be extended from the ecological point of view. (2) from the point of view of emergy flow, only consider the non-renewable resources, C. The D model has the best performance. Considering the optimal performance of capital input C model and output alone, B, D model is the best. A, B model is more dependent on non-renewable resources, and C model is suitable for resource shortage areas. The D model is more suitable for energy shortage and economically developed areas. A, C model is suitable for the areas with sufficient resources and underdeveloped economies. (3) the emergy output rate is higher than that of the model, the environmental load rate and the sustainable development index are compared. D model is the best, followed by model C, the emergy output rate is basically the same as model A, the environmental load rate and sustainable development index are higher than model A, model A is more efficient, but the environmental pressure is the largest. The environmental pressure of model B is better than that of model A, but the output rate is decreased, and the comprehensive sustainable development index is lower than that of model A. from the economic and ecological point of view, the choice is not recommended.
【学位授予单位】:中国地质大学(北京)
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:X703

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 冯霄,闵淑玲,代玉利,刘永忠;多产品工业系统的能值分析[J];过程工程学报;2005年03期

2 钦佩,黄玉山,谭凤仪;从能值分析的方法来看米埔自然保护区的生态功能[J];自然杂志;1999年02期

3 解苗苗;;河北省生态系统的静态能值分析[J];时代金融;2014年06期

4 戴波,周鸿;喀斯特生态系统区典型县域的能值分析[J];城市环境与城市生态;2005年03期

5 彭建;刘松;吕婧;;区域可持续发展生态评估的能值分析研究进展与展望[J];中国人口.资源与环境;2006年05期

6 王秀红;;生态脆弱区耕地集约利用变化的能值分析[J];中国农学通报;2012年26期

7 李俊莉;曹明明;;基于能值分析的国家可持续发展实验区可持续性评估[J];水土保持通报;2012年06期

8 时冬晴;叶建生;;山东省环境—经济系统的能值分析[J];淮海工学院学报(自然科学版);2006年04期

9 常PrPr;刘素玲;张芸;张树深;;大连市渔业生态系统能值分析[J];海洋环境科学;2010年01期

10 蓝盛芳,陈飞鹏,刘新茂;农业生态经济系统的能值分析[J];生态科学;1995年02期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 王秀红;申元村;;能值分析与地理学的综合研究[A];《自然地理学与生态建设》论文集[C];2006年

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 李胜男;基于水力学特性的改良型厌氧折流板反器(mABR)运行效能及数值模拟研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2016年

2 杨慧;基于能值分析的植物生物质能评价的研究[D];华南理工大学;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 潘子欣;污水处理综合利用项目能值分析兼论滨海地区模式[D];中国地质大学(北京);2017年

2 石晓川;污水处理企业设备维修合同预算审核机制研究[D];天津工业大学;2016年

3 宋U喰,

本文编号:2476253


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2476253.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户53eb1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com