当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 经管博士论文 >

基于模糊博弈的企业知识联盟利益分配研究

发布时间:2018-03-31 14:54

  本文选题:知识联盟 切入点:模糊博弈 出处:《西安理工大学》2017年博士论文


【摘要】:伴随我国经济发展的新常态及“十三五”规划对企业知识转型的重视,在科技创新的国家战略背景下,企业联盟方式早已由产品联盟转变为知识联盟,而企业知识联盟就是各成员企业为了获取更大利益而结合在一起的集成体,这个集成体的成功构建与健康发展,取决于各成员企业之间的高效合作,亟需对共同拥有的资源进行优化配置,对联盟收益进行合理地协商分配,本质上可视为多人合作博弈问题。然而,以往国内外很多研究者大都借助传统合作博弈解决企业知识联盟利益分配问题,但传统博弈的合作格局已无法满足现实生活中成员企业的合作需求,各成员企业更多的情况下并不是以全部资源完全参与到某个特定知识联盟中,而是以部分资源不同程度地与多个联盟进行合作。在由传统的完全合作格局向现实中的部分合作格局转变的需求及其设计环境下,本文以知识联盟成员合作的模糊特性为突破口,以模糊合作博弈理论为支撑,以构建均衡的模糊合作博弈格局为躯干,以寻求最优的合作利益分配方案为驱动,形成基于模糊博弈的企业知识联盟利益分配研究框架及方法论体系,主要体现在:(1)提炼了企业知识联盟成员合作的模糊特性。首先,借助模糊数表示成员企业参与知识联盟的程度,将企业知识联盟成员合作的过程视为通过成员企业、参与度、策略、收益等基本要素所呈现的模糊合作博弈过程。然后,借助完全信息与不完全信息下成员选择博弈,分析了成员企业建立长期合作伙伴关系的选择策略。最后,基于参与度实现了企业知识联盟由传统博弈下的合作到模糊博弈下合作的自然延拓。(2)分析了企业知识联盟合作利益的影响因素。首先,从联盟总体和联盟个体两个层面,分析了企业组建知识联盟是为了取得共同利益和协同效应,即实现1+12的效应。然后,确定了企业知识联盟合作利益的关键影响变量,分别探索了知识联盟总收益、成员企业的资源投入和预期效用、成员企业推测取得高收益的概率、结盟前收益等对知识联盟合作利益的影响。最后,对企业知识联盟合作利益的特征函数进行表述,并刻画了企业知识联盟合作利益的模糊分配模型及其之间的包含关系。(3)研究了企业知识联盟利益分配的谈判均衡。首先,提出了企业知识联盟利益分配研究应遵循的基本原则。然后,概括了纳什谈判的公理化,并分析了两企业及多企业纳什谈判模型及其均衡。最后,通过参与度的引入,将传统博弈格局下成员企业针对谈判点提出的异议及反异议进行模糊化延拓,提出了模糊谈判集概念,为具体模糊博弈格局下企业知识联盟最优利益分配方案存在性论证提供服务。(4)构建了知识联盟成员企业的模糊网络博弈及模糊平均单调博弈的合作格局。分析了企业知识联盟成员合作所呈现的网络效应,及成员伙伴的平均贡献值随联盟增大而提高的性质,得出了模糊网络博弈及模糊平均单调博弈的均衡结果,论证了两种博弈格局下企业知识联盟最优利益分配方案的存在性,以及模糊谈判分配方案与模糊核心分配方案的等价性,研究结论为决策者提供了一定的参考信息。(5)探索了利益分配视角下企业知识联盟可持续合作对策。为满足企业知识联盟保留部分总收益值用于再合作的实际需求,将调整系数引入传统分配模型,扩展并构建了广义分配模型,为知识联盟再分配及再合作提供理论依据,我国5G知识联盟案例分析表明:在知识联盟不存在传统最优利益分配方案的情况下,可利用广义分配模型寻求知识联盟的广义最优分配方案,既解决了知识联盟利益分配问题,又为知识联盟可持续合作提供了对策。
[Abstract]:With the new normal for China's economic development and the "13th Five-Year" plan of the enterprise knowledge transformation and attention, in the national strategy background of technological innovation, has been changing from product enterprise alliances alliance and knowledge alliance, knowledge alliance is the member enterprises in order to obtain greater benefits and in combination with the integration of the integrated together. The successful construction and healthy development depends on the efficient cooperation among the member enterprises, to optimize the allocation of shared resources, the alliance benefits negotiated allocation reasonably, can be regarded as the essence of multi person cooperative game problem. However, many researchers at home and abroad mostly by means of traditional cooperative game, solve the problem of distribution of interests enterprise knowledge alliance, but the traditional game cooperation pattern has been unable to meet the member enterprises in the real life situation of cooperation needs more members of enterprises Not all the resources to fully participate in a particular knowledge alliance, but in different part of resources and a plurality of alliance partners. In the demand part cooperation pattern transformation from traditional pattern to fully cooperate in reality and design environment, fuzzy characteristics based on the knowledge alliance cooperation as a breakthrough, to fuzzy cooperative game theory, based on fuzzy cooperative game equilibrium pattern construction for the trunk, to find the optimal allocation scheme for cooperative interest drive, the formation of enterprise knowledge alliance profit distribution fuzzy game theory research framework and methodology based on the system, mainly reflected in: (1) extracting fuzzy characteristics of enterprise knowledge alliance members first, by means of fuzzy number member enterprises to participate in the knowledge alliance, knowledge alliance members will work as the member enterprises, participation, strategy Fuzzy cooperative game, the basic elements of income present. Then, with the help of the game under complete and incomplete information, analyzes the choice of strategy to establish a long-term cooperative partnership of the member enterprises. Finally, the participation of enterprise knowledge alliance from the traditional game to the fuzzy game under the cooperation of the natural extension based on the extension. (2) analyzed the influencing factors of cooperative benefit enterprise knowledge alliance. Firstly, from the alliance and alliance overall individual two aspects, analysis of enterprise knowledge alliance is to achieve mutual benefit and synergy effect is the realization of 1+12. Then, determine the key effect of cooperative benefit enterprise knowledge alliance variables. Total revenue respectively to explore the knowledge alliance, members of the enterprise resource investment and expected utility, members of the enterprise that has high probability of earnings, earnings before Alliance on knowledge alliance cooperation. Beneficial effect. Finally, the characteristic function of cooperative benefits in enterprise knowledge alliance are introduced, and characterize the relationship of fuzzy cooperative benefit allocation model including the enterprise knowledge alliance between and. (3) studied the negotiation interests distribution of enterprise knowledge alliance. Firstly, this paper puts forward the basic principles of the distribution of interests in enterprise knowledge alliance should follow. Then, summarized the axiomatic Nash talks, and analyzes two enterprises and enterprises Nash bargaining model and its equilibrium. Finally, through the introduction of participation, the traditional game pattern for the member enterprises to negotiate the objection and counter objection point fuzzy extension, put forward the fuzzy set concept of negotiation. Provide service demonstration for the optimal distribution of interests in enterprise knowledge alliance specific fuzzy game pattern. (4) proposed a fuzzy network game knowledge alliance and fuzzy mean The monotonous game pattern of cooperation. Analysis of network effects of enterprise knowledge alliance members, and members of the average contribution value and improve the properties of partners with the increase of the alliance, the fuzzy network game and the equilibrium results of fuzzy mean monotone game, demonstrates two game existence pattern of enterprise knowledge alliance optimal distribution of interests the scheme, and the equivalence of fuzzy negotiation allocation scheme and fuzzy core allocation scheme, the conclusion of the study can provide some reference information for decision makers. (5) to explore the enterprise knowledge alliance profit distribution from the perspective of sustainable cooperation strategy. To meet the enterprise knowledge alliance retained part of the total profit value for the actual demand of cooperation, will the adjustment coefficient is introduced into the traditional distribution model, extended and constructed general distribution model, to provide a theoretical basis for knowledge alliance redistribution and then cooperation, China's 5G knowledge alliance case Case analysis shows that: in the case of knowledge alliance does not exist traditional optimal profit distribution scheme, we can use generalized assignment model to search for generalized optimal distribution scheme of knowledge alliance, which not only solves the problem of knowledge alliance benefit distribution, but also provides countermeasures for knowledge alliance's sustainable cooperation.

【学位授予单位】:西安理工大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F272

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李翠;薛惠锋;;企业知识联盟的可持续发展对策研究——以利益分配为视角[J];技术经济与管理研究;2016年12期

2 张炜;耿生玲;童英华;韩邦合;;基于模糊软合作博弈的收益分配[J];江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版);2016年02期

3 高长元;刘划;王京;;基于模糊合作博弈的移动云计算联盟利益分配模型研究[J];科技与管理;2016年01期

4 余晓钟;杨洋;刘维;;不同合作竞争类型的组织学习策略研究[J];软科学;2015年11期

5 关菲;张强;栗军;;基于λ-最大相容类的粗糙规划模型及其在企业战略联盟形成决策问题中的应用[J];运筹与管理;2015年02期

6 李翠;薛昱;王文胜;;基于平均单调博弈广义解的收益再分配模型[J];控制与决策;2015年04期

7 商淑秀;张再生;;虚拟企业知识共享演化博弈分析[J];中国软科学;2015年03期

8 李泉林;段灿;鄂成国;杨碧蕊;;云资源提供商的合作博弈模型与收益分配研究[J];运筹与管理;2014年04期

9 李翠;薛昱;;基于谈判集的模糊合作博弈的收益分配方案[J];控制与决策;2014年11期

10 郭鹏;陈玲丽;;模糊环境下模糊联盟收益分配模型和算法研究[J];模糊系统与数学;2014年03期

相关博士学位论文 前7条

1 郑月龙;基于演化博弈论的企业共性技术合作研发形成机制研究[D];重庆大学;2015年

2 张建良;基于非合作博弈的分布式优化模型及算法研究[D];浙江大学;2014年

3 张艳菊;虚拟企业预期收益分享的模糊合作博弈分析[D];辽宁工程技术大学;2013年

4 李群峰;知识型企业合作剩余分配讨价还价博弈分析[D];首都经济贸易大学;2011年

5 唐锦铨;面向产业集群的企业知识联盟研究[D];华侨大学;2009年

6 李江;基于知识网络的企业网络化创新能力研究[D];天津大学;2008年

7 王昭;具有模糊支付的博弈问题及其应用研究[D];北京理工大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 李豪;基于合作博弈的供应链企业之间利益分配的研究[D];兰州交通大学;2014年

2 张磊生;产业技术创新战略联盟利益分配研究[D];湖南大学;2013年

3 白辰;企业技术联盟利益创造与分配机制研究[D];大连理工大学;2013年

4 浦培根;工程项目突发事件知识联盟利益分配研究[D];天津大学;2012年

5 李颖;基于知识溢出效应的知识联盟利益分配研究[D];西安电子科技大学;2011年

6 徐小丽;博弈视角下的知识联盟形成动因与机制研究[D];江西财经大学;2010年

7 汪之明;产学研联盟利益分配机制研究[D];大连理工大学;2010年

8 朱s,

本文编号:1691213


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/jjglbs/1691213.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户49eb0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com