互联网背景下区城开放式创新与资源共享模式研究

发布时间：2018-06-13 23:43

本文选题：互联网 + 区域开放式创新　；参考：《中国科学技术大学》2016年博士论文

【摘要】：经济的全球化发展和国际竞争的日益激烈,导致创新管理的复杂性上升。行业和企业面临创新能力增长与研发投入增长不同步,创新动力不足的困境。传统的完全依靠自身资源的封闭式创新模式受到严重挑战。知识性员工和外部资源的可用性增加,创新主体可以跨边界的获得资源。随着互联网技术的发展,创新资源的流动性增加,为创新主体获得创新资源提供了技术条件。但是,创新主体寻求创新资源的范围扩大化,导致注意力的分散和管理成本的上升,需要有选择的确定共享对象和共享程度,以此来聚焦于更有效率和效益的共享模式,提高创新绩效。开放式创新从2003年由Henry Chesbrough教授提出之后,关于开放式创新的研究基本集中于企业,关注于开放式创新模式、管理策略和开放式创新绩效的影响因素等,很少有关于区域开放式创新的研究。2010年,意大利帕多瓦大学的Belussi教授将开放式创新引入区域,提出区域开放式创新系统,认为区域创新的边界也是可以渗透的。因此,区域作为比企业更复杂的主体,探讨如何实现区域的开放式创新对区域和国家的创新战略有重要意义。互联网背景下,组织可以获取的资源来源更广泛,资源种类更多,而且互联网下的共享的所有权和使用权分离的核心原则深刻的改变着传统行业的经营活动和商业模式以及资源配置方式。而开放式创新也倡导创新资源的开放共享,因此在互联网视角下研究创新资源共享可以有效的提高区域创新的经济效益。开放式创新实践中存在的开放对象的选择、合作时机的把握成为研究难点。同时,互联网去中心化和去中介化的出现也对创新活动提出了新的要求。为了解决上述问题,本论文第二章着重从文献分析中探寻解决共享对象和共享程度的合理视角,确定了以邻近性为选择资源共享对象的标准,以开放度为资源共享度的测度的标准来分析中国区域创新中的资源共享,同时为企业的开放式创新实践中可能存在的问题提供一种解决思路；第三章分析了互联网的现状和特征以及未来的发展：第四章重点对比了传统的资源共享与互联网背景下的资源共享的区别,开放式创新中资源共享,并分析了共享经济对开放式创新中资源共享可能带来的影响；第五章重点分析邻近性是如何影响区域开放式创新的,理清了邻近性、吸收能力和区域创新之间的关系,从而为如何选择共享对象提供实证支撑：第六章研究了资源共享度对区域开放式创新的影响,探讨资源共享度对创新的影响机制以及是否存在过度的资源共享影响创新绩效：在上述两章实证研究的基础上,第七章和第八章初步分析了资源共享的一般机制以及共享经济视角下区域开放式创新的模式;最后为本文做出结论以及总结本文后续研究就可以做的相关议题。
[Abstract]:The globalization of the economy and the increasingly fierce international competition have led to the increase in the complexity of innovation management. Industry and enterprises are facing the dilemma of innovation ability growth and R & D input growth. The traditional closed innovation model, which relies solely on its own resources, is seriously challenged. Knowledge workers and external resources With the increase of availability, the innovators can obtain resources across the border. With the development of Internet technology, the mobility of innovative resources increases, and the technological conditions are provided for the innovation resources to obtain innovative resources. However, the scope of innovation resources is expanded, which leads to the choice of the decentralization of attention and the rise of management costs. Identifying shared objects and sharing levels to focus on more efficient and efficient sharing patterns and improving innovation performance. Open innovation, after being proposed by Professor Henry Chesbrough in 2003, focuses on open innovation, focusing on open innovation models, management strategies and the impact of open innovation performance. Factors and so on, there are few studies on open regional innovation in.2010. Professor Belussi of University of Padua in Italy introduced open innovation into the region and proposed a regional open innovation system, which believed that the boundary of regional innovation could be permeable. Therefore, the region, as a more complex subject than the enterprise, explored how to realize the opening of the region. Innovation is of great significance to regional and national innovation strategies. Under the background of the Internet, the organization can obtain more resources and more resources, and the core principles of the sharing of ownership and right to use under the Internet profoundly change the activities of the business, the business model and the allocation of resources in the traditional industry. Open innovation also advocates the opening and sharing of innovative resources, so it can effectively improve the economic benefits of regional innovation in the perspective of Internet. The choice of open objects in open innovation practice and the grasp of the opportunity of cooperation become the research difficulties. In order to solve the above problems, in order to solve the above problems, the second chapter of this paper focuses on exploring a reasonable perspective to solve the sharing object and sharing degree from the literature analysis, and determines the standard of choosing the sharing object with proximity, and analyzes the regional innovation in China with the standard of the measure of the degree of openness as the resource sharing degree. The third chapter analyzes the present situation and characteristics of the Internet and the future development of the Internet. The fourth chapter focuses on the difference between the traditional resource sharing and the sharing of resources under the Internet, and the sharing of resources in the open innovation. And the impact of shared economy on resource sharing in open innovation is analyzed. The fifth chapter focuses on the analysis of how proximity affects open innovation in the region, clarifies the relationship between proximity, absorptive capacity and regional innovation, so as to provide empirical support for how to choose shared objects: the sixth chapter studies the sharing of resources. The impact of degree on regional open innovation, the impact of resource sharing on innovation and the existence of excessive resource sharing influence innovation performance: on the basis of the above two chapters, the seventh and eighth chapters have preliminarily analyzed the general mechanism of resource sharing and the model of regional open innovation from the perspective of shared economy. Finally, we conclude and summarize the related topics for future research.
【学位授予单位】：中国科学技术大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F273.1

【相似文献】