当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 经管硕士论文 >

基于ISO26000中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险研究

发布时间:2018-06-21 05:24

  本文选题:对外公共投资项目 + 社会责任风险 ; 参考:《对外经济贸易大学》2017年博士论文


【摘要】:近几年,中国对外大型公共投资项目风险事件频发,引起了国内外的广泛关注。而对于中国对外公共投资项目风险研究主要从经济风险角度展开,对社会责任风险关注较少。并且国内对社会责任风险评价主要基于企业视角,对中国对外公共投资项目评价相对较少。根据ISO26000《社会责任指南》国际标准对中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险研究更是少之又少,缺乏系统的评价研究,依据ISO26000《社会责任指南》国际标准六大因素对中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险的定量分析更是几乎没有。本文依据ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准中人权、劳工实践、环境、公平运行实践、消费者问题、社区参与和发展等六大主题对中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险的定量分析进行了探索与尝试。本文研究的主要内容:第一,从国内外有关公共投资风险、对外公共投资项目社会责任风险理论基础以及对外公共投资项目社会责任评价等三个方面展开文献归纳与理论梳理,对中国对外公共投资项目风险的理论与实践发展动态进行述评,为开展中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险研究奠定基础。第二,基于六大主题设计公共投资项目社会责任风险问卷调查,开展中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险影响因素实证研究。主要从ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准中人权、劳工实践、环境、公平运行实践、消费者问题、社区参与和发展六大主题围绕组织治理,通过OLS模型、Logit模型、Probit模型三个模型,基于对189个中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险的调查问卷展开了中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险影响因素的实证研究。第三,基于ISO26000中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价研究。基于中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险影响因素实证研究的结果,将显著或者比较显著的指标纳入到评价指标体系中,基于ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准,构建了包括项目选择、项目实施、项目后续三个一级指标,国际协作共同开发,东道国国内政治环境,东道国地域政治环境等9个二级指标;人权风险指标、处理申诉指标、弱势群体指标、政治权利指标等21个三级指标的中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价指标体系,并运用专家打分与层次分析法计算各一、二、三级指标相对于总目标的权重。第四,中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险双案例评价与比较研究。依据上一部分构建的中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价指标体系,基于多层次模糊综合评价法,以三峡集团竞标巴西水电站与柬埔寨甘再水电站项目为例验证了中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价指标体系的科学性与合理性。本文得到以下主要研究结论:第一,运用了OLS模型、Logit模型、Probit模型三个模型验证了ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准中人权、劳工实践、环境、公平运行实践、消费者问题、社区参与和发展六大因素中21个变量显著的对中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险产生重要影响的一致结论。第二,依据ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准人权、劳工实践、环境、公平运行实践、消费者问题、社区参与和发展六大主题35个二级议题,构建了对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价指标体系,评价结果显示:一级指标权重从大到小依次是项目选择指标(0.4777)、项目后续指标(0.3166)、项目实施指标(0.2057);三级指标权重前五位的依次是国际协作共同开发指标(0.1691)、东道国地域政治环境指标(0.1551)、东道国国内政治环境指标(0.1535)、争议处理指标(0.0759)、社区环境指标(0.0577)。第三,依据本文构建的中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价指标体系,通过对中国对外公共投资项目三峡集团竞标巴西水电站与柬埔寨甘再水电站项目为例进行了案例研究。基于多层次灰色模糊综合评价法,双案例评价结论验证了中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价指标体系的科学性与合理性。本文创新之处主要体现在以下三个方面:第一,率先从国际社会责任角度探讨中国对外公共投资项目风险问题。当前研究主要还是从传统的经济风险角度考察对外公共投资项目风险问题,而本文从中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险的起始点视角展开研究,基于中国对外公共投资项目选择风险、实施风险、后续风险等全过程的社会责任风险展开研究,基于ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准来进行综合评价。第二,在国内率先提出了依据ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准六大主题设计了中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险评价指标体系,具备包括:项目选择指标、项目实施指标、项目后续指标等3个一级指标;国际协作共同开发,东道国国内政治环境,东道国地域政治环境等9个二级指标;人权风险指标、处理申诉指标、弱势群体指标、政治权利指标等21个三级指标。第三,率先基于ISO26000《社会责任指南》标准六大主题对中国对外公共投资项目社会责任风险综合评价定量分析进行了探索与尝试。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the risk events of China's large public investment projects have occurred frequently, causing widespread concern at home and abroad. The risk of China's foreign public investment projects is mainly from the perspective of economic risk and less concerned about the risk of social responsibility. The evaluation of public investment projects is relatively small. According to the ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > the international standards for the study of the social responsibility risk of public investment projects in China, there are few and few research. The social responsibility risk of China's foreign public investment projects is based on the six major factors of ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > international standards. The quantitative analysis of quantitative analysis is almost not. This paper explores and tries the quantitative analysis of the social responsibility risk of Chinese public investment projects in accordance with the ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > standards for human rights, labor practice, environment, fair operation practice, consumer issues, community participation and development. The main contents of this paper are: ISO26000< First, from the three aspects of public investment risk at home and abroad, the theoretical basis of social responsibility risk for foreign public investment projects and the evaluation of social responsibility for foreign public investment projects, this paper reviews and reviews the theory and practice of China's foreign public investment project risk, in order to carry out China's foreign investment The research of social responsibility risk of public investment project lays the foundation. Second, based on the six major topics, design the social responsibility risk questionnaire of public investment projects, to carry out an empirical study on the factors affecting the social responsibility risk of Chinese public investment projects. The main factors are human rights, labor practice, environment and fair operation in the standard of ISO26000< social responsibility. The six major themes of practice, consumer problems, community participation and development around the organizational governance, through the OLS model, the Logit model, and the Probit model three models, based on the questionnaire on the social responsibility risk of 189 Chinese foreign public investment projects, an empirical study on the factors affecting the risk of social responsibility of the public investment items in China. Third, Based on the ISO26000 China external public investment project social responsibility risk assessment research. Based on the results of the empirical research on the impact factors of the social responsibility risk of China's foreign public investment project, the significant or more significant indicators are incorporated into the evaluation index system. Based on the ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > standard, the project selection is constructed. Project implementation, the following three first grade indicators, international cooperation and joint development, the host country's domestic political environment, the host country's regional political environment and other 9 two level indicators; human rights risk indicators, treatment of appeals indicators, vulnerable group indicators, political rights indicators, and other 21 three indicators of social responsibility for public investment in China's social responsibility risk assessment Standard system, and use expert scoring and analytic hierarchy process to calculate the weight of each, two, three index relative to the total target. Fourth, China's foreign public investment project social responsibility risk double case evaluation and comparative study. Based on the first part of China's foreign public investment item social responsibility risk evaluation index system, based on multi layer The sub fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, taking the Brazil hydropower station and Kampuchea Gump hydropower station project of the Three Gorges group as an example, validates the scientificity and rationality of the social responsibility risk evaluation index system of China's foreign public investment project. The following main research conclusions are obtained: first, three models of OLS model, Logit model and Probit model are used. Verify the ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > standard for human rights, labor practice, environment, fair operation practice, consumer problems, community participation and development of the six major factors of 21 significant impacts on the social responsibility risk of Chinese public investment projects. Second, according to the ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > standard person Right, labor practice, environment, fair operation practice, consumer problem, community participation and development of six major topics 35 two issues, construction of the public investment project social responsibility risk evaluation index system. The evaluation results show that the first grade index weight from large to small is the project selection index (0.4777), project follow-up index (0.3166), project Implementation index (0.2057); the top five of the three level index weight are the international cooperation and common development index (0.1691), the host country's regional political environment index (0.1551), the host country's domestic political environment index (0.1535), the dispute handling index (0.0759), the community environment index (0.0577). Third, according to the Chinese foreign public investment project society constructed in this article. A case study is carried out on the project of Brazil hydropower station and Kampuchea Gan re hydropower station by the bidding of the Three Gorges project group of China's foreign public investment project. Based on the multi-level grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the double case evaluation results verify that the social responsibility risk assessment of the external public investment project in China refers to the risk assessment. The innovation of this article is mainly embodied in the following three aspects: first, it is the first to explore the risk of China's foreign public investment project from the perspective of international social responsibility. The current research is mainly from the perspective of the traditional economic risk. The research on the starting point of the social responsibility risk of the co investment project is based on the study of the social responsibility risk in the whole process of selecting risk, carrying out risk, following risk and so on, based on the ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > standard. Second, the first proposed in China is based on the ISO26000< society. Responsibility Guide > standard six major themes designed the Chinese public investment project social responsibility risk evaluation index system, including: project selection index, project implementation index, project follow-up index and other 3 first level indicators; international cooperation joint development, host country's domestic political environment, host country political environment and other 9 two level indicators; The right risk index, dealing with the appeal index, the weak group index, the political rights index and so on 21 three level indicators. Third, first based on the ISO26000< social responsibility Guide > standard six main themes to the Chinese foreign public investment project social responsibility risk comprehensive evaluation quantitative analysis carried out and tried.
【学位授予单位】:对外经济贸易大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F125


本文编号:2047418

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/jjglss/2047418.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3bfa4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com