当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 农业博士论文 >

东北黑土区典型小流域农业面源污染源解析及防控措施效果评估

发布时间:2017-12-27 03:10

  本文关键词:东北黑土区典型小流域农业面源污染源解析及防控措施效果评估 出处:《中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所)》2016年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 农业面源污染 源解析 稳定同位素 最佳管理措施 效果评估 东北黑土区


【摘要】:由农业面源污染导致的水环境质量下降和水生态系统破坏是全世界共同关注的重要环境问题,水土流失既是面源污染发生的动力也是污染物迁移的载体。因此,识别水土流失特征,明确农业面源污染来源及主要影响因素,并采取有效防控措施对改善农业面源污染现状,加快水生态环境修复重建、流域水资源管理具有重要意义。本研究选择东北低山丘陵区典型小流域(吉林省东辽县杏木小流域)为研究对象,采取标准小区定位监测、野外试验观测相结合的方法,研究了坡面和小流域尺度农业面源污染特征,分析了典型污染物主要来源及贡献率,评估了典型面源污染防控措施的效果。通过研究得出以下主要结论:(1)研究区侵蚀性降雨主要发生在6-8月,降雨量和雨强是影响坡耕地水土流失和面源污染物输出的重要因素,且表现为显著的正线性相关性。坡度也是坡耕地水土流失和面源污染物输出的重要影响因素。(2)坡耕地径流中总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)的浓度均超过“地表水环境质量标准”Ⅴ类水限值。氮(N)是坡耕地输出的主要面源污染物,2013-2014年TN的年输出量占面源污染物总输出量的55%-69%。(3)坡耕地径流中NH4+-N浓度值最高,村屯径流中NO3--N、TN和TP浓度值最高;不同土地利用方式下,四种面源污染物输出负荷大小为耕地林地村屯,对小流域面源污染物输出的贡献率分别为68.0%-70.7%,16.0%-21.3%和10.7%-13.3%。N是小流域最主要的农业面源污染物,硝态氮(NO3--N)输出负荷大于铵态氮(NH4+-N)。(4)坡耕地径流中NO3--N和NH4+-N主要来源分别为大气降雨、土壤和化肥,林地径流中两种形态N来源为大气降雨和土壤,而村屯径流中N主要来源于大气降雨、生活污水和排泄物。2013-2014年土壤源对坡耕地、林地地表径流中NO3--N的贡献率最大,分别为51.38%-54.13%和52.82%-69.11%;农村生活污水和畜禽排泄物污染源分别在2013(51.30%)和2014年(50.64%)对村屯径流中NO3--N的贡献率最大。(5)垄向区田措施防治水土流失和面源污染的效果显著,不同区田处理5-9月径流量削减54%-68%,泥沙量流失降低91%-97%,粮食产量增长14.96%-25.67%,75 cm档距处理水土保持效果好于65 cm、85 cm档距,并且75 cm档距面源污染负荷削减效果最佳;垄向区田4种面源污染物年输出量削减率可达80.60%-93.47%。(6)植草带措施能够延迟产流发生时间,显著减少坡耕地水土流失量及面源污染物输出负荷。苜蓿草带在5-9月份径流削减率达到55.36%-100%,泥沙削减率达91.47%-98.03%,四种面源污染物输出负荷的削减率达到68.85%-90.23%;自然恢复草带径流、泥沙削减率分别为6.66%-100%、76.11%-89.63%,面源污染物输出负荷削减率达15.82%-73.90%,苜蓿草带的污染防控效果优于自然恢复的植被草带。总体而言,N、O同位素技术能够较好的应用于农业面源污染源解析,为有效开展农业面源污染防治工作提供了科学依据;垄向区田和植草带两种措施具有良好的面源污染防控效果,能够在源头上减少东北黑土区坡耕地水土流失和农业面源污染,削减污染物负荷输出,降低对水体环境的危害,尤其适宜在黑土区水源地流域水土保持及生态环境恢复与重建工作中进行推广应用。
[Abstract]:The decline of water environment quality and the destruction of water ecosystem caused by agricultural non-point source pollution is an important environmental problem all over the world. Soil and water loss is both the driving force of non-point source pollution and the carrier of pollutant migration. Therefore, identifying the characteristics of soil and water loss, identifying the sources and main influencing factors of agricultural non-point source pollution, and taking effective prevention and control measures are of great significance for improving the current situation of agricultural non-point source pollution, speeding up the rehabilitation and reconstruction of water ecological environment, and managing water resources in river basins. This study selects typical small watershed of hilly region in Northeast China (Dongliao County of Jilin province apricot wood small watershed) as the research object, adopt the method of standard cell positioning monitoring, field observation of combining the characteristics of slope and Small Watershed Agricultural non-point source pollution, analyzes the main sources and the contribution rate of typical pollutants, evaluation. The typical non-point source pollution prevention and control measures of the effect. The following conclusions can be drawn from the study: (1) the erosive rainfall in the study area mainly occurred in 6-8 months, and rainfall and rainfall intensity were the important factors that affected soil and water loss and the output of non-point source pollutants, and showed a significant positive linear correlation. Slope is also an important factor affecting soil and water loss and the output of non-point source pollutants in sloping land. (2) the concentration of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in the runoff of sloping farmland is more than the water limit of the "surface water environmental quality standard". Nitrogen (N) is the main surface source pollutant in the output of slope farmland, and the annual output of TN in 2013-2014 years accounts for 55%-69% of the total output of the source pollutants. (3) the runoff in slope land value is the highest concentration of NH4+-N, NO3--N, TN and villages in the runoff TP concentration is highest; the different land use patterns, four kinds of non-point source pollutants output load into farmland woodland villages of small watershed non-point source pollutant output accounted for 68.0%-70.7%, 16.0%-21.3% and 10.7%-13.3%. N is the main agricultural non-point source pollutant in small watershed, and the output load of nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N) is greater than ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N). (4) NO3--N and NH4+-N were the main sources in slope farmland runoff to rainfall, soil and fertilizer, woodland runoff in two forms of N source for atmospheric rainfall and soil, and villages in runoff N mainly from rainfall, sewage and waste. 2013-2014 soil source on NO3--N slope land, runoff in the maximum contribution rate were 51.38%-54.13% and 52.82%-69.11%; rural sewage and livestock excreta pollution sources in 2013 (51.30%) and 2014 (50.64%) the maximum rate of NO3--N in runoff contribution. (5) to control soil ridge area measures of erosion and non-point source pollution effect, different area 5-9 monthly runoff reduced 54%-68%, sediment erosion decreased 91%-97%, grain yield increase of 14.96%-25.67%, 75 cm span treatment effect of soil and water conservation in 65 cm, 85 cm and 75 cm span, the span of non-point source pollution the effect of the optimal load shedding; ridge tillage 4 kinds of non-point source pollutants annual output reduction rate of up to 80.60%-93.47%. (6) take measures to delay planting runoff occurrence time, and significantly reduce the amount of non-point source pollution load of slope farmland soil erosion. Alfalfa with 5-9 month runoff reduction rate reached 55.36%-100%, the sediment reduction rate reached 91.47%-98.03%, four kinds of non-point source pollutants output load reduction rate reached 68.85%-90.23%; natural restoration with grass runoff and sediment reduction rate were 6.66%-100%, 76.11%-89.63%, non-point source pollutant output load reduction rate of 15.82%-73.90% is better than that of pollution prevention and control effect of alfalfa belt the natural restoration of vegetation with grass. Overall, N and O isotope technology can be better applied to the agricultural non-point pollution source analysis, provide a scientific basis for effective prevention and control of agricultural non-point source pollution; ridge with two kinds of measures to field planting and non-point source pollution prevention and control has good effect, can reduce the slope coveron soil erosion and Agriculture Non-point source pollution at the source, reduce pollutant load output, reduce the harm to the aquatic environment, especially suitable for soil and water conservation in the water basin soil area and restoration of the ecological environment and promote the application of reconstruction work.
【学位授予单位】:中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所)
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:X71;X52

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 高凤杰;侯大伟;姜晗;郑惠玉;闫岩;张颖;;阿什河流域农业非点源污染源解析及空间异质性[J];东北农业大学学报;2014年09期

2 李瑞;杨光檄;李勇;杜迪;刘凤仙;;贵州省喀斯特地区典型小流域水土流失面源污染研究[J];水土保持应用技术;2014年04期

3 王珊珊;张帅;王诗乐;沈海龙;高大文;;河岸带乔木树种配置方式对面源污染物NH_4~+-N的去除效果[J];森林工程;2014年04期

4 许晓鸿;隋媛媛;张瑜;欧洋;罗莉莉;李阳;;东北丘陵区沟蚀发展现状及影响因素分析[J];土壤学报;2014年04期

5 余龙飞;李炳文;张逸;王章玮;;我国一些站点降雨和森林穿冠水中铵态氮的同位素丰度[J];环境化学;2013年09期

6 许晓鸿;隋媛媛;张瑜;王永丰;刘明义;刘艳军;;黑土区不同耕作措施的水土保持效益[J];中国水土保持科学;2013年03期

7 肖波;喻定芳;赵梅;王庆海;申小波;;保护性耕作与等高草篱防治坡耕地水土及氮磷流失研究[J];中国生态农业学报;2013年03期

8 史静;卢谌;张乃明;;混播草带控制水源区坡地土壤氮、磷流失效应[J];农业工程学报;2013年04期

9 汤洁;刘畅;杨巍;李昭阳;吴佳曦;;基于SWAT模型的大伙房水库汇水区农业非点源污染空间特性研究[J];地理科学;2012年10期

10 唐佐芯;王克勤;;草带措施对坡耕地产流产沙和氮磷迁移的控制作用[J];水土保持学报;2012年04期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 王朝霞;哈志宏;;辽源市杨木水库生活饮用水源地环境保护研究[A];中国环境科学学会2006年学术年会优秀论文集(中卷)[C];2006年

相关博士学位论文 前5条

1 梁冬梅;小流域面源污染特征与控制技术研究[D];吉林大学;2014年

2 艾蕾;南水北调中线水源区典型流域土壤侵蚀与水环境特征研究[D];华中农业大学;2013年

3 蒲玉琳;植物篱—农作模式控制坡耕地氮磷流失效应及综合生态效益评价[D];西南大学;2013年

4 陈自祥;利用水体中溶解性硝酸根离子中的氮氧同位素组成来识别中国太湖和巢湖水体中氮污染源的研究[D];中国科学技术大学;2012年

5 王伟伟;长江口潮滩营养动态与稳定同位素指示研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 张俊萍;利用N、O同位素技术研究太n圃撕又械姆植继卣骷袄丛碵D];安徽理工大学;2015年

2 李阳;伊通河流域农业面源污染负荷估算及其防治对策研究[D];东北师范大学;2012年

3 王萍;拦截草带对坡耕地水土流失及氮磷输出的控制作用研究[D];西南林业大学;2011年



本文编号:1339988

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/nykjbs/1339988.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2eedd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com