我国切花害虫甜菜夜蛾遗传多样性及遗传结构研究
本文选题:切花 + 甜菜夜蛾 ; 参考:《沈阳农业大学》2016年博士论文
【摘要】:近年来,随着全球气候变暖以及我国花卉种植面积的不断增加,危害我国切花花卉害虫种类逐渐增多、危害程度日趋严重、抗药类别及抗性水平增强,给我国切花花农造成了严重的经济损失。其中,甜菜夜蛾Spodoptera exigua是危害切花的一种重要的夜蛾科害虫,如何对其进行有效防控是切花害虫防治的一项重要工作。目前,鉴于我国危害切花的夜蛾科害虫幼虫种类难鉴定、甜菜夜蛾的种群发生动态以及我国各主要发生危害区的虫源关系不明确,使得对甜菜夜蛾尚无系统、完善和有效的防治策略的实际问题,本研究利用性信息素诱捕器对沈阳地区切花害虫甜菜夜蛾的种群动态进行为期四年的系统监测(2012-2015年);利用DNA条形码技术对采自我国切花上的夜蛾科害虫幼虫进行分子鉴定,以明确危害我国切花的夜蛾科害虫种类;与此同时,利用不同分子标记技术,mtDNA基因(COI和Cytb)和微卫星(SSR)对我国不同地理种群甜菜夜蛾的遗传多样性及种群遗传结构进行深入研究,在分子水平上探讨甜菜夜蛾不同地理种群间的遗传进化关系,进而为深入探讨物种来源、种群发生规律及成灾遗传机理提供理论基础。最后,对我国不同地理种群甜菜夜蛾胞内共生菌Wolbachia的分布与感染特点进行研究,以明确宿主感染率及Wolbachia株系系统发育地位,为深入探讨Wolbachia与宿主物种间进化关系奠定基础,进而为害虫的生物防治提供理论依据。主要获得了以下研究结果:1.2012-2015年,沈阳地区4年全年诱集到的甜菜夜蛾数量分别为46、274、503和772头。2012年7月06日始见甜菜夜蛾发生,全年1个发生高峰期;2013年6月24日始见甜菜夜蛾发生,全年3个发生高峰期。10月末之后,甜菜夜蛾发生量锐减;2014年6月09日田间始见甜菜夜蛾发生,7月25日前,发生量较低,全年2个发生高峰期;与前3年相比较,2015年甜菜夜蛾发生量大,初春发生早,5月底始见田间甜菜夜蛾发生,全年3个发生高峰期。2.确定了危害我国切花上的5种夜蛾科害虫,即甜菜夜蛾Spodoptera exigua、棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera、甘蓝夜蛾Mamestra brassicae、斜纹夜蛾Spodoptera litura以及粘虫Mythimna separate。基于COI基因序列的这5种夜蛾科害虫幼虫种间平均遗传距离为0.093,种内平均遗传距离为0.0018。其中,斜纹夜蛾与甜菜夜蛾之间的遗传距离最小为0.066。斜纹夜蛾与棉铃虫之间遗传距离最大为0.107。与之相比较,5种花卉夜蛾科害虫幼虫Cytb基因序列的种间平均遗传距离为0.110,种内平均遗传距离为0.002。其中,斜纹夜蛾与甜菜夜蛾间遗传距离最小为0.084。甜菜夜蛾与甘蓝夜蛾间遗传距离最大为0.138。3.利用mtDNA COI序列(578 bp)和Cytb序列(724 bp)分别对采自我国20省44县(市)和47县(市)的甜菜夜蛾遗传多样性和遗传结构进行研究。总体上,我国甜菜夜蛾遗传多样性较低(COI:Hd=0.276±0.020,Pi=0.00115±0.00014;Cytb:Hd=0.654± 0.017,Pi=0.00238±0.00020).分别确定了41和112个单倍型。各单倍型未形成明显的系统地理格局,散布在不同的地理种群中。基于COI基因的我国甜菜夜蛾不同地理种群间的平均遗传距离为0.001,怀化(HH)种群与其他48个地理种群遗传距离最远。与之相比较,基于Cytb基因的我国甜菜夜蛾不同地理种群间的平均遗传距离为0.003,总体上,TL(通辽)、NJ(南京市)和BD(保定)种群与其它地理种群遗传距离远。另外,Mantel test检验结果表明,地理距离与遗传距离存在相关性,地理隔离对甜菜夜蛾遗传分化无显著影响。分子变异分析(global AMOVA)结果表明,我国不同地理种群甜菜夜蛾遗传变异主要来自于种群内部(COI:77.14%;Cytb:84.86%),种群间的遗传变异水平较低。不同的地理条件与气候条件并不是影响甜菜夜蛾种群遗传结构与物种分布格局的主要因素。中性检验参数(Tajima's D和Fu's FS)皆为负值,且达到显著差异水平,结合单峰错配分布(Mismatch distribution)结果表明,甜菜夜蛾在我国曾经历过种群扩张。4.利用SSR对采自我国20省44县(市)甜菜夜蛾地理种群916头甜菜夜蛾的遗传多样性的研究结果表明,总体上遗传多样性偏低,即等位基因(Na)为5.909,有效等位基因数(Ne)为3.351。KM(昆明)种群具有最高遗传多样性。UPGMA聚类分析树状图结果表明,LY(凌源)、HH(怀化)、GL(桂林)、DA(海口)与其他地理种群遗传距离较远。TA(泰安)、WH(武汉)和DA(海口)种群与其他种群存在显著的遗传分化,大部分种群间遗传分化不显著。贝叶斯聚类分析表明,当K=2时,甜菜夜蛾种群明显分为两支,即ocean(S group)和inland(L group)。但是,表现出高水平的混杂、广泛的杂合和充分的基因流。Mantel Test分析表明地理距离对甜菜夜蛾遗传分化没有显著的影响。分子变异分析(global AMOVA)结果表明,95.53%遗传变异主要发生在种群内,而种群间的变异仅为4.47%。分子变异等级分析(hierarchical AMOVA)结果表明,0.16%遗传变异来源于组间,3.91%来源于此两组的种群间。5.利用wsp对我国甜菜夜蛾胞内共生菌Wolbachia进行感染率检测与系统发育分析。研究结果表明,内共生菌Wolbachia在我国不同地理种群的甜菜夜蛾体内感染率极低,在所检测的我国20省44县(市)的765头甜菜夜蛾样品中,仅仅WF种群(江苏盐城市大丰市)感染了Wolbachia,并且,确定其株系属于Supergroup B组。说明,该类内共生菌在不同地理种群的甜菜夜蛾中感染率极低。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasing of global warming and the growing area of flower planting in China, the species of flower pests in China are increasing, the damage degree is becoming more and more serious, the anti drug category and the resistance level have been strengthened, which have caused serious economic losses to the flower flower farmers in China. In this case, the Spodoptera exigua of the beet armyworm is one of the harm to cut flowers. It is an important work to prevent and control the important pests of noctura noctura. At present, in view of the difficult identification of the larva species of the nocturnal insect pests in China, the population dynamics of the beet armyworm and the relationship between the main harmful regions of our country are not clear, so there is no system for the beet nocturnal moth. In this study, the population dynamics of the Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera in Shenyang area was monitored for four years (2012-2015 years) by using sex pheromone trap, and the DNA barcode technique was used to identify the larvae of the nocturnal insect pests on the cut flower of China, in order to harm our country clearly. At the same time, using different molecular markers, mtDNA gene (COI and Cytb) and microsatellite (SSR), the genetic diversity and population genetic structure of Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera were studied, and the genetic relationship between different geographic populations of the Spodoptera Spodoptera was discussed at the molecular level. In order to explore the origin of species, the regularity of population generation and the genetic mechanism of disaster, the distribution of Wolbachia and the characteristics of the infection of the intracellular symbiotic bacteria of the Spodoptera Spodoptera in China were studied in order to clarify the infection rate of the host and the phylogenetic status of the Wolbachia strain, so as to explore the interrelationship between the Wolbachia and the host species. The relationship laid the foundation and provided the theoretical basis for the biological control of the pests. The following results were obtained. In 1.2012-2015, the number of beet armyworm luring in the year of 4 years in Shenyang was 46274503 and 772 of.2012 year July, the beet armyworm occurred on 06 days, 1 peaks in the whole year. In June 24, 2013, the sweet Spodoptera was sweet. The occurrence of Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera was found at the end of the 3 peak period of.10 month, and the occurrence of beet Spodoptera Spodoptera was sharply reduced. On the 09 day of June 2014, the occurrence of beet armyworm was found in the field. Before July 25th, the occurrence of the Spodoptera Spodoptera was lower and 2 had the peak period of the year. Compared with the previous 3 years, the occurrence of beet armyworm in 2015 was large, early spring occurred early, and the field beet armyworm occurred in the end of May, and the occurrence of beet armyworm was seen in the end of May, The 3 peak.2. of the year confirmed the 5 species of nocturnal insect pests on Chinese cut flowers, namely, Spodoptera exigua of beet armyworm, Helicoverpa armigera of cotton bollworm, Mamestra brassicae of nocturnal moth, Spodoptera litura of Spodoptera Spodoptera, and Mythimna separate. based on the sequence of COI base among the 5 larvae of nocturnal pests The genetic distance was 0.093 and the intraspecific average genetic distance was 0.0018.. The genetic distance between the Spodoptera Spodoptera and the beet armyworm was the smallest between 0.066. and cotton bollworm, and the maximum genetic distance was 0.107. compared with that of the cotton bollworm. The average interspecific genetic distance of the Cytb gene sequence of the 5 species of the insect larvae was 0.110, and the intraspecific inheritance of the genetic distance was 0.110. The distance is 0.002., the genetic distance between the Spodoptera Spodoptera and the beet armyworm is the smallest, the largest genetic distance between the 0.084. beet armyworm and the Spodoptera Spodoptera is 0.138.3. using mtDNA COI sequence (578 BP) and Cytb sequence (724 BP) to study the genetic diversity and genetic structure of the Spodoptera Spodoptera in 20 provinces and 44 counties (cities) and 47 counties (cities) of China. In vivo, the genetic diversity of Spodoptera exigua was low (COI:Hd=0.276 + 0.020, Pi=0.00115 + 0.00014; Cytb:Hd=0.654 + 0.017, Pi=0.00238 + 0.00020). 41 and 112 haplotypes were identified respectively. Each haplotype did not form a distinct geographic pattern and distributed in different geographic populations. The different geography of Chinese beet armyworm based on COI gene The average genetic distance between the population is 0.001, the Huaihua (HH) population is the farthest from the other 48 geographical populations. Compared with the Cytb gene, the average genetic distance between the different geographical populations of the beet armyworm is 0.003. In general, the TL (Tongliao), the NJ (Nanjing) and the BD (Baoding) population are far from the other geographical populations. The results of Mantel test test showed that there was a correlation between geographical distance and genetic distance, and geographical isolation had no significant influence on the genetic differentiation of beet armyworm. The results of molecular variation analysis (global AMOVA) showed that the genetic variation of Spodoptera Spodoptera from different geographic populations mainly came from the intra species (COI:77.14%; Cytb:84.86%), and the inheritance between populations. Different geographic conditions and climatic conditions were not the main factors affecting the genetic structure and species distribution pattern of the beet armyworm population. The neutral test parameters (Tajima's D and Fu's FS) were negative and reached significant differences. The result of single peak mismatch distribution (Mismatch distribution) showed that the beet armyworm was in our country. The genetic diversity of the 916 beet Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera from 20 provinces and 44 counties of China was studied with population expansion.4.. The genetic diversity of the Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera Spodoptera showed that the genetic diversity was low, that is, the allele (Na) was 5.909 and the number of effective alleles (Ne) was the highest genetic diversity.UPGMA cluster in 3.351.KM (Kunming) population. The dendrogram showed that the genetic distance between LY (Lingyuan), HH (Huaihua), GL (Guilin), DA (Haikou) and other geographical populations was far from.TA (Tai'an), WH (Wuhan) and DA (Haikou) population and other populations had significant genetic differentiation, and the genetic differentiation between most of the populations was not significant. The Bayesian cluster analysis showed that when K=2, the beet armyworm population was obviously divided into two groups. Two, ocean (S group) and inland (L group). However, the high level of hybrid, extensive heterozygosity and full gene flow.Mantel Test analysis showed that the geographical distance had no significant effect on the genetic differentiation of the beet armyworm. The results of molecular variation analysis (global AMOVA) showed that the 95.53% genetic variation mainly occurred in the population and between the population. The variation is only 4.47%. molecular variation grade analysis (hierarchical AMOVA). The results show that 0.16% genetic variation comes from intergroup and 3.91% from the two groups of.5. using WSP to detect the infection rate and phylogenetic analysis of the intracellular symbiotic bacteria Wolbachia of the Spodoptera exigua. The results show that the endosonde Wolbachia is not in China. The infection rate of the Spodoptera Spodoptera was very low in the same geographical population. In the samples of 765 beet armyworm in 20 provinces and 44 counties of China, only WF population (Dafeng City, Yancheng City, Jiangsu) infected Wolbachia, and it was determined that the strains belonged to group Supergroup B. It indicated that the infection rate of this kind of endophytic bacteria in the beet armyworm in different geographic populations was extremely high. Low.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S436.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张占伟,任付超,张亚杰,王允;商丘市防治棉田甜菜夜蛾的有效措施[J];中国棉花;2000年07期
2 王朝阳,刘志勇,李卫国,刘文涛,王刚,杜国顺,李国安;安阳市棉田甜菜夜蛾的发生特点及防治对策[J];中国棉花;2000年07期
3 许国庆,孟未来,王丽娟,杨蕾,安桂荣,王德伟,褚茗莉,赵季秋;甜菜夜蛾在辽宁爆发成灾[J];辽宁农业科学;2000年06期
4 林相军,史永森,靳书波,王春玉;也谈甜菜夜蛾的发生与防治[J];河南农业;2000年08期
5 ;为您提供《科学防治甜菜夜蛾》录像带[J];植保技术与推广;2000年03期
6 任宝珍,孙作文;山东省甜菜夜蛾的发生与防治[J];植保技术与推广;2000年03期
7 冯殿英,任兰花,郝伟,王继藏,徐春明;菏泽地区甜菜夜蛾发生及防治[J];植保技术与推广;2000年03期
8 杨万海,任宝珍;夜蛾必杀对甜菜夜蛾的防治效果和使用技术[J];植保技术与推广;2000年03期
9 杨荣明,朱叶芹,张瑞平;江苏省1999年甜菜夜蛾发生特点及原因分析[J];植保技术与推广;2000年04期
10 王春义;甜菜夜蛾的发生及防治[J];河南农业科学;2001年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王雪啸;文礼章;;关于甜菜夜蛾英文文献统计量概述[A];华中昆虫研究(第6卷)[C];2010年
2 朱志良;王标;王永青;张秀成;;甜菜夜蛾发生特点与防治技术[A];江苏省昆虫学会第十一届会员代表大会暨学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
3 滕海媛;袁永达;张天澍;王冬生;;甜菜夜蛾基因组DNA提取及其细胞色素C氧化酶Ⅰ亚基部分序列测定[A];粮食安全与植保科技创新[C];2009年
4 尤俊花;;甜菜夜蛾的发生与防治[A];河南省植保学会第九次、河南省昆虫学会第八次、河南省植病学会第三次会员代表大会暨学术讨论会论文集[C];2009年
5 王利霞;;甜菜夜蛾的综合防治技术[A];河南省植保学会第九次、河南省昆虫学会第八次、河南省植病学会第三次会员代表大会暨学术讨论会论文集[C];2009年
6 宋国春;于迎春;杨万海;尹相韦华;;山东省甜菜夜蛾的发生危害及其防治[A];“植物保护21世纪展望”——植物保护21世纪展望暨第三届全国青年植物保护科技工作者学术研讨会文集[C];1998年
7 陆致平;陈小萍;刘于成;沈利明;;甜菜夜蛾的发生规律及其防治策略[A];走向21世纪的中国昆虫学——中国昆虫学会2000年学术年会论文集[C];2000年
8 戴率善;李宗冠;李艳红;李翠芹;仇保华;张英;;徐州地区甜菜夜蛾的发生规律及治理对策[A];植病、昆虫学会通讯3[C];2002年
9 陆致平;;甜菜夜蛾发生特点及综合治理对策[A];当代昆虫学研究——中国昆虫学会成立60周年纪念大会暨学术讨论会论文集[C];2004年
10 施文贤;侯耀国;吴梅;周丽花;倪伟峰;;甜菜夜蛾成虫监测技术及在防治上的应用[A];江苏省昆虫学会第十一届会员代表大会暨学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 蒋建科;紧急防治甜菜夜蛾[N];人民日报;2001年
2 黄又芝;防治蔬菜甜菜夜蛾有何最佳药品[N];北京科技报;2003年
3 代建法;防治大葱甜菜夜蛾适用药[N];江苏农业科技报;2014年
4 河北省农业厅 姜京宇;怎样防甜菜夜蛾[N];河北农民报;2005年
5 ;甜菜夜蛾[N];江苏农业科技报;2004年
6 ;甜菜夜蛾的发生与防治技术[N];瓜果蔬菜报.农业信息周刊;2007年
7 玉德;甜菜夜蛾无公害防治[N];河南科技报;2007年
8 唐山市丰南区农业畜牧水产局 李冲;大白菜甜菜夜蛾防治要点[N];河北科技报;2006年
9 方圆;防治蔬菜甜菜夜蛾药剂[N];江苏农业科技报;2007年
10 方圆;沿海地区部分玉米田发生甜菜夜蛾[N];江苏农业科技报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 任相亮;甜菜夜蛾中四类Cry1Ca候选受体基因的克隆与功能分析[D];南京农业大学;2014年
2 周俐宏;我国切花害虫甜菜夜蛾遗传多样性及遗传结构研究[D];沈阳农业大学;2016年
3 付建业;甜菜夜蛾细胞分裂染色体行为及染色体核型的研究[D];中国农业大学;2004年
4 吴刚;植物抗虫物质对甜菜夜蛾营养效应和酶活性的影响[D];中国农业科学院;2009年
5 吴志毅;甜菜夜蛾与藜科植物互作关系研究[D];浙江大学;2006年
6 刘思思;甜菜夜蛾蛹黑突变体的适合度变化及其黑化机制研究[D];华中农业大学;2015年
7 刘永杰;甜菜夜蛾抗药性监测与抗性机理研究[D];南京农业大学;2002年
8 贾变桃;甜菜夜蛾的抗药性监测及对虫酰肼的抗性风险研究[D];南京农业大学;2007年
9 兰亦全;甜菜夜蛾对拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂抗药性及其机理研究[D];福建农林大学;2004年
10 郑霞林;甜菜夜蛾抗寒力及在中国的越冬区划研究[D];华中农业大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王姗姗;RNAi介导的甜菜夜蛾性信息素合成激活肽及其受体基因的功能鉴定[D];中国农业科学院;2015年
2 李春雨;基于数字基因表达谱的甜菜夜蛾表皮蛋白基因CPR97和CPR63的研究[D];华中农业大学;2015年
3 周今一;寄主植物调节甜菜夜蛾对球孢白僵菌感受性的差异研究[D];上海海洋大学;2015年
4 侯蕾蕾;甜菜夜蛾中肠钙粘蛋白的Cry蛋白受体功能分析[D];华中农业大学;2015年
5 占莎;甜菜夜蛾cDNA文库构建及谷胱甘肽S-转移酶分子特性研究[D];华中农业大学;2014年
6 金蓉;甜菜夜蛾2个气味结合蛋白基因的克隆、表达特征及功能分析[D];南京农业大学;2014年
7 孙星星;甜菜夜蛾对氰氟虫腙的抗性风险评估及其抗性机制初探[D];南京农业大学;2014年
8 周秋霞;甜菜夜蛾抗Bt(Cry1Ac)品系的生态适应性研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
9 余慧灵;四川地区甜菜夜蛾抗药性监测及溴氰虫酰胺对其亚致死效应研究[D];四川农业大学;2015年
10 袁向东;棉铃虫、甜菜夜蛾中肠受体蛋白与Bt毒素结合能力的研究[D];中国农业科学院;2016年
,本文编号:1788199
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/nykjbs/1788199.html