3,4,5-三羟基苯甲酸甲酯抑制番茄青枯病菌的机制及防病作用研究
[Abstract]:The bacterial wilt of tomato is a devastating soil borne disease caused by Ralstonia salanocearum of Solanum Solanum. At present, chemical agents are still used in the prevention and control of the disease, because there are few fungicides to prevent and control the disease, and the pathogenic bacteria have produced different degrees of resistance to the current used medicament after long-term use, which leads to the prevention of effect. Therefore, agricultural production urgently needs to develop a new type of high efficiency, low toxicity, and low residual fungicide to prevent and control plant bacterial wilt. Previous studies have shown that the 3,4,5- three hydroxybenzoate (Methyl Gallate, MG) isolated from the leaves of the wood wax leaves has a strong inhibitory effect on Solanum Solanum L., but MG inhibits the Solanum Solanum The mechanism and the study on the prevention and control of Solanum wilt were not thorough enough. Therefore, the effects of MG on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Solanum Solanum were determined, and the changes of the protein group under the inhibition of MG were analyzed, the control effect of MG on Tomato Bacterial Wilt and the transmission characteristics of the tomato plant were measured. The main results are as follows: 1.MG can destroy the integrity of cell wall of Solanum Solanum mycelium, inhibit the production of cellulase and pectinase, reduce the activity of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), and inhibit the glycolysis - three carboxylic acid cycle.2. in 20 mu by promoting the increase of the NADH/NAD+ ratio. There are 29 proteins with distinct differences in protein expression in R. solanacearum, and 22 different proteins are identified by mass spectrometry, including 11 new proteins, 5 missing proteins, 1 expressions of up regulation proteins and 5 expression decreasing proteins. These proteins include participation in energy metabolism, signal transduction, material transport and transcription repair. It is preliminarily conjectured that MG should have multiple target targets for Solanum Solanum, in which the inhibition of the energy metabolism of the bacteria may be one of the mechanisms of the inhibitory effect of MG on Solanum Solanum..3. will knock out the gene RSc3316 of the new protein F0F1ATP synthase epsilon of Solanum Solanum after the action of MG and obtain the missing mutant Delta DM33 16 and the complementary strain ACM3316 of the mutant, in order to study the genetic function of the new protein FOF1ATP synthase epsilon subunit after the MG effect of Solanum Solanum,.4.MG has a long holding time for the protection of tomato bacterial wilt. After 15d, inoculated with bacterial wilt, the control effect is still 52.15%. After inoculation of the pathogen 5D, the MG plant is applied to prevent the inoculation. The treatment effect was only 13.03%, indicating that the therapeutic effect of the medicament on tomato bacterial wilt is weak.MG can be absorbed quickly by tomato plant root system, and the control effect of 96.67%.MG in tomato roots for MG inoculating pathogen is very poor in the heading and direction of tomato plant, and the root inoculation after MG and root inoculation after MG after MG are inoculated. The enzyme activities related to the root and disease resistance and the secondary metabolites of tomato roots after treatment with 14.44% and 9.44%.5.MG were changed. Compared with the plants treated with 0.1% methanol solvent, the activity of IAAO decreased and the activity of POD had not changed obviously, but the activity of PPO was not obviously changed, but the viability of PPO was increased. MG was used to treat and inoculate the plant of pathogenic bacteria, PAL The activity continued to increase. The root of tomato treated with MG in seedling and field period was higher than that of disease related geraniol, sterol, beta glutamol and cork alcohol, which were higher than that of tomato plants treated with 0.1% methanol solvent.6.MG, which had a certain promoting effect on the germination of tomato seeds, such as.20 mu g /mL and 50 g/mL MG, clear water and 0.1% methanol solvent. The germination rates of 4D were 73.38%, 66.69%, 53.33%, 48.89%, 20 mu g/mL and 50 g/mL MG respectively. The seed germination rates were significantly higher than that of the clear water and 0.1% methanol solvent treatment.7.MG for tomato bacterial wilt disease,.0.5 g/L MG and 20% thiazen suspension agent for tomato bacterial wilt disease were 60.22% and 48.86%.MG respectively. The yield per mu was 2982.4 kg, which was 153.99% higher than CK treatment, and had no effect on the species and quantity of bacteria in soil.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S436.412.15
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李海涛,邹庆道,吕书文,穆欣,许文奎;番茄青枯病的研究进展[J];园艺学报;2001年S1期
2 刘玲;;番茄青枯病的发生与防治[J];农村科技开发;2002年11期
3 龙良鲲;番茄青枯病的研究进展[J];广西农业科学;2002年03期
4 张合龙;番茄青枯病的发生及其防治方法[J];中国农村科技;2002年10期
5 宫钦晓;保护地番茄青枯病的防治技术[J];植保技术与推广;2002年11期
6 胡庆春;温室番茄青枯病防治技术[J];北方园艺;2003年01期
7 李万富,孙淑华,高志强;温室番茄青枯病防治技术[J];农业科技通讯;2004年05期
8 黄阿兴;番茄青枯病的发生与防治[J];吉林蔬菜;2004年04期
9 杨自力;马东霞;马鲁英;邵爱兰;牛汝花;王晓敏;宋家海;;番茄青枯病及其防治技术[J];中国农村小康科技;2005年12期
10 黄后琚;韦春洪;韦勇;;康地蕾得细粒剂防治番茄青枯病试验[J];广西植保;2005年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 赵从新;郑宇峰;王顺党;;番茄青枯病的发生与防治[A];云南省“粮食高产创建”省农科院“八百双倍增工程”科技培训暨云南农业科技论坛论文集[C];2009年
2 汪国平;林明宝;吴定华;曾宪铭;;广东省番茄青枯病及抗病育种研究概况[A];全国蔬菜遗传育种学术讨论会论文集[C];2002年
3 何鸿洪;潘文道;黎起秦;林纬;彭好文;蒙姣荣;;番茄青枯病拮抗放线菌的筛选研究[A];科技创新与绿色植保——中国植物保护学会2006学术年会论文集[C];2006年
4 张海利;陈永兵;徐坚;;番茄青枯病生物防治进展[A];中国园艺学会十届二次理事会暨学术研讨会论文摘要集[C];2007年
5 邓利娟;;浅谈番茄青枯病的发生与防治[A];河南省植保学会第九次、河南省昆虫学会第八次、河南省植病学会第三次会员代表大会暨学术讨论会论文集[C];2009年
6 唐银东;何礼远;张长龄;华静月;;番茄青枯病生物防治初步研究[A];全国生物防治学术讨论会论文摘要集[C];1995年
7 赵娜;蔡昆争;汪国平;王勇;;家畜堆肥对番茄青枯病的控制作用及其与土壤微生物活性的关系[A];第五届中国青年生态学工作者学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
8 潘光辉;张峗;尹贤贵;杨琦凤;;番茄青枯病病原鉴定及抗病材料选育[A];重庆市园艺学会会员代表大会论文集[C];2005年
9 冷鹏;田枫;范永强;刘凌霄;张素梅;庄克章;;20%噻唑锌SC防治番茄青枯病试验初报[A];公共植保与绿色防控[C];2010年
10 谭兆赞;刘可星;廖宗文;;生化腐植酸对土壤微生物多样性及番茄青枯病的影响[A];第五届全国绿色环保肥料新技术、新产品交流会论文集[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 ;番茄青枯病的防治[N];吉林农村报;2007年
2 周丽 周秀武;番茄青枯病防治[N];云南科技报;2007年
3 抚宁县留守营农技推广站 刘静;番茄青枯病防治莫放松[N];河北科技报;2008年
4 高举;番茄青枯病的防治[N];山西科技报;2001年
5 马楠;怎样防治番茄青枯病[N];山西科技报;2005年
6 本报记者 宁钦广;专家:典型番茄青枯病 早期防治效果好[N];山东科技报;2014年
7 曹县农业局 王成业 朱冬梅 王艳华;番茄青枯病的识与防[N];菏泽日报;2005年
8 湖北省丹江口市十堰农校 陈茂春;番茄青枯病综合防治[N];河北科技报;2013年
9 山东省农科院植保所 李林 徐作廷 李长松 齐军山;番茄青枯病为害严重 保护地栽培加强防治[N];山东科技报;2001年
10 翟广华 曹伟;番茄青枯病防治技法[N];云南科技报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 范腕腕;3,4,5-三羟基苯甲酸甲酯抑制番茄青枯病菌的机制及防病作用研究[D];广西大学;2016年
2 韦中;生物有机肥防控土传番茄青枯病的效果及其机制研究[D];南京农业大学;2012年
3 黎起秦;番茄内生细菌及其对番茄青枯病的防治作用研究[D];湖南农业大学;2005年
4 周田甜;番茄青枯病拮抗菌J12和J2的分离鉴定及抗生素2,4-DAPG合成和调控研究[D];南京农业大学;2012年
5 陈双臣;转座子Ac/Ds的番茄转化与转双价基因对提高番茄青枯病抗性的研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李波;微生物肥“宁盾”在番茄、甜瓜上的示范推广[D];南京农业大学;2014年
2 杨婷婷;利用番茄相关细菌防治番茄青枯病的筛选策略研究[D];南京农业大学;2009年
3 廖咏梅;番茄青枯病防治技术的研究[D];广西大学;2002年
4 王震;水培番茄青枯病发生条件及防治研究[D];华中农业大学;2008年
5 王羽;无致病力青枯病病菌对番茄青枯病的控病研究[D];西南农业大学;2004年
6 随学超;无土栽培系统中番茄青枯病流行因素及微生态防治途径初探[D];南京农业大学;2007年
7 黄明媛;番茄青枯病拮抗菌筛选鉴定及发酵条件研究[D];东北农业大学;2011年
8 何鸿洪;番茄青枯病拮抗放线菌的筛选研究[D];广西大学;2006年
9 李伟杰;番茄青枯病拮抗菌的筛选、鉴定和应用研究[D];中国农业科学院;2006年
10 刘俊平;无致病力hrp-突变体防治番茄青枯病作用研究[D];中国农业科学院;2006年
,本文编号:2167942
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/nykjbs/2167942.html