长期定位施肥条件下旱地小麦“产量差”影响因子评估
[Abstract]:The "yield difference" of dry-farmed wheat is the difference between the potential productivity of rain-fed wheat and the actual yield of farmland. It is affected by various factors such as climatic factors, fertilizers, soil nutrients and crop varieties. In order to solve the problem of inappropriate evaluation of influencing factors of "poor yield" in wheat production, a long-term positioning experiment in Changwu (since 1984) was carried out. Six fertilization treatments and four fertilization treatments of grain and soybean rotation were selected for wheat continuous cropping. The productivity potential of rain-fed wheat was evaluated by DSSAT model combined with field experiment. At the same time, the temporal variation of meteorological factors, soil nutrients, soil moisture and their effects on wheat yield difference were analyzed. Finally, the collinearity between variables was eliminated by partial least squares regression analysis, and the main controlling factors of wheat yield difference under long-term continuous cropping and crop-bean rotation were identified quantitatively. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) DSSAT model is suitable for the application in the Loess dryland. The potential productivity of rain-fed wheat in the study area is 8324 kg 65507 "Yield difference" of wheat was significantly higher than that of single organic fertilizer (M), nitrogen and phosphorus (NP) and nitrogen and phosphorus organic fertilizer (NPM). The highest "yield difference" of wheat was 6996 kg The highest yield difference was found in CK and the lowest in NPM. The highest fertilizer contribution rate and the lowest precipitation utilization rate were found in NPM, and the lowest was found in CK. The contribution rate of fertilizer and the utilization rate of precipitation under combined fertilization were higher than those under single fertilization and non-fertilization, and the effect of fertilization was the most obvious in the drought year with low yield and high water content. Mean temperature, solar radiation, leisure precipitation and growth year (leisure + growth period) precipitation showed an increasing trend, growth period precipitation showed a decreasing trend, monthly precipitation showed a decreasing trend in March, May, June, October and December, and other months showed an increasing trend. The correlation coefficients were 0.816, 0.832 and 0.901, 0.619 and - 0.688, respectively, in drought and September, and 0.619 and - 0.688 in December, respectively. There was a very significant positive correlation between the precipitation of growth year and August precipitation in flood years. The results showed that soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium in CK and N treatments maintained one level and fluctuated between years. By the end of 2014, the available phosphorus in P increased by 12.39 times, the available potassium in NP decreased by 9.58% and the ratio of each nutrient in NPM to the initial stage of the experiment increased significantly. The yield difference of wheat was positively correlated with the available potassium in CK and positively correlated with the soil nutrient in P treatment. As of 2014, soil available phosphorus under P treatment was 12.90 times higher than that at the beginning of the experiment, soil available potassium under NP treatment was 14.69% lower than that at the beginning of the experiment, and nutrients under NPM combined application were significantly higher than that at the beginning of the experiment. Soil nutrients were negatively correlated at all fertilization levels. (4) Soil water content under long-term continuous cropping and rotation of grain and soybean showed that the average water storage at sowing and harvesting stages was the highest in continuous cropping, and the lowest in NPM application. The lowest water consumption of wheat was 70.55 mm and 347.65 mm under single P application, respectively. The water use efficiency of wheat was significantly higher in combined fertilization than that of non-fertilization and single fertilization. The absolute value of soil water consumption and water consumption of wheat in grain-bean rotation were the lowest in CK; the change trend of water storage and water use efficiency between different fertilization was similar to that in continuous cropping at sowing and harvesting stages; the "yield difference" of wheat was negatively correlated with the water storage and water consumption of wheat at sowing stage of single P application, and positively correlated with soil water consumption. The correlation coefficients were - 0.700, - 0.817 and 0.826. (5) Multiple linear tests were conducted to test the relationship between the "yield difference" and precipitation factors. It was found that there were multiple collinearities among many precipitation factors, especially between the precipitation in the growth year and the fallow period and the precipitation in the growth period. Multiple collinearity among independent variables, continuous cropping, crop-soybean rotation, continuous cropping and crop-soybean rotation combination models showed that the explanations of the first component and the second component for wheat "yield difference" were relatively large. The cumulative explanations of the two components in the three models were 66.7%, 84.4% and 74.9%, respectively. The second component is mainly dominated by nitrogen, phosphorus and organic fertilizers. Through the independent variable projection importance index (VIP value), we can see that nitrogen, phosphorus, organic fertilizer, leisure precipitation and growth year precipitation play an important role in wheat "yield difference" (VIP1), and the growth period accumulated temperature, average temperature, total solar radiation, wheat varieties, seeds and varieties. The effect of planting methods on wheat "yield difference" was relatively weak (VIP1), and the regression coefficient of variables showed that the "yield difference" of wheat decreased with the increase of fertilizer application and precipitation in fallow period and growing year.
【学位授予单位】:中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S512.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 龚江;侯振安;谢海霞;;长期定位施肥对棉花生长及产量的影响[J];中国棉花;2010年10期
2 聂胜委;黄绍敏;张水清;郭斗斗;张巧萍;张玉亭;宝德俊;陈源泉;;长期定位施肥对土壤效应的研究进展[J];土壤;2012年02期
3 王改玲;李立科;郝明德;张萌;;长期定位施肥对土壤重金属含量的影响及环境评价[J];水土保持学报;2010年03期
4 乔云发;韩晓增;赵兰坡;;长期定位施肥对黑土碳氮储量的影响[J];农业系统科学与综合研究;2011年04期
5 路钰,董旭,于立宏;辽宁省土壤长期定位监测试验1992~2002年结果初报[J];土壤通报;2003年04期
6 张大庚;祝艳青;李天来;依艳丽;姜维;;长期定位施肥对保护地土壤钙素形态分布的影响[J];水土保持学报;2011年02期
7 韩晓日;袁程;王月;杨劲峰;李娜;张欣昕;;长期定位施肥对土壤铜、锌形态转化及其空间分布的影响[J];水土保持学报;2011年05期
8 王英;王爽;李伟群;魏丹;周宝库;王玉峰;;长期定位施肥对土壤生理转化菌群的影响[J];生态环境;2008年06期
9 李孟飞;;长期定位施肥对土壤重金属含量的影响[J];安徽农业科学;2008年14期
10 吐尔逊阿依·艾沙;;长期定位施肥对棉花生长及产量的影响[J];北京农业;2011年30期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 慕韩锋;王俊;刘康;刘文兆;党廷辉;王兵;;黄土旱塬长期定位施磷对土壤磷素空间分布及有效性的影响[A];中国地理学会2007年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2007年
2 王冬梅;王晓英;陈保冬;王幼珊;朱永官;;长期定位施肥土壤中的丛枝菌根真菌及其频度[A];第五次全国土壤生物和生物化学学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 胡雨彤;长期定位施肥条件下旱地小麦“产量差”影响因子评估[D];中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心;2017年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈红娜;长期定位施肥对棕壤铁、锰形态及有效性的影响[D];沈阳农业大学;2016年
2 郭顺;长期定位施肥对土壤各形态K、Ca、Mg及其有效性的影响[D];沈阳农业大学;2016年
3 谭福雷;长期定位施肥对设施番茄土壤理化性质、微生物、产量及品质的影响[D];沈阳农业大学;2016年
4 黄驰超;长期定位施肥对土壤铁形态及有机碳固定的调控研究[D];南京农业大学;2015年
5 孙富生;长期定位施肥土壤中重金属含量及其络合机制研究[D];南京农业大学;2015年
6 孙好;长期定位施肥对红壤肥力及作物的影响[D];福建农林大学;2009年
7 晁赢;长期定位施肥对土壤肥力特征及养分吸收利用的影响[D];山东农业大学;2009年
8 刘恩科;长期定位不同施肥制度土壤功能衰退与修复研究[D];山东农业大学;2004年
9 唐玉姝;长期定位施肥对太湖地区水稻土酶活性的影响[D];西南大学;2007年
10 郭隽馥;长期定位施肥棕壤及西藏高原土土壤微生物特性研究[D];东北大学;2008年
,本文编号:2204229
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/nykjbs/2204229.html