技艺与皇权:清宫造办处的历史研究
[Abstract]:Handicraft is the most important skill expression in ancient society. This paper takes the Qing palace office as the research object, takes the technical social history as the research angle, adopts the literature investigation method, the contrast analysis method and the document metrology method, studies the historical evolution of the Qing palace building office, and probes into its historical significance. At the same time, try to respond to the Qing Palace Office of the artisanal skills reflected in the problem. Through the research, the article draws the following conclusions: first, the Qing Palace Office is a production institution of the Qing Dynasty, formed in the historical clues of the continuous improvement and development of the Qing Dynasty. Is under the guidance of Emperor Kangxi around the heart of the temple workshop and the formation of the Qing Dynasty imperial handcraft department. In the early Qing Dynasty, there existed the alternation between the Ministry of Industry system and the inner government system, and the establishment of the Office of the Qing Dynasty finally realized the transformation from the inner court production to the inner government system. Secondly, according to the amount of workload undertaken by the Qing palace office, the history of the office is divided into five periods: establishment period, development period, peak period, conservation period and extinction period. In the history of these changes, the name of the Qing palace building office has undergone changes such as "Yangxin Hall", "Building Office Office", "Yangxin Dian Office", "House Office Building Office", and so on. It has also experienced corresponding changes such as the Yangxin Temple and the Wushu Hall. Yangxin Temple Office and the House Office of the four stages. Third, the production network of the Qing palace office is all over the country, and its workshops are divided into two parts: inside and outside Beijing. The layout of the workshops in Beijing presents the characteristics of "city and garden double pattern", and the place of production outside Beijing is the supplement of the workshop in Beijing. The two ends of the imperial art network in the Qing Dynasty were the court and the place. Between the court and the place, the local skill represented by "snowdrift white" supports and complements the court skill from artisans, materials, utensils, etc. And the court art also by the circulation of objects to affect the local way. Fourth, emperors, officials and craftsmen played different roles in the Qing palace office. The two emperors Yongzheng and Qianlong enthusiastically participated in the production of the work as designers and managers; officials, especially those represented by Prince Yi Yunxiang, Haiwang and Tang Ying, were typical "technical officials". The artisans are the subjects of the Qing Palace with their personal ability and skill savvy in the management of every link of the Qing Palace Office. Between emperors and craftsmen, the role of artisans' subjectivity is not excluded by the participation of imperial power, on the contrary, there are some bright points in the craftsmen who cooperate with the demands of emperors through positive posture. Craftsmen from all over the country and even foreign countries cooperated with the monarchs to form the court skills of the Qing Dynasty. Fifth, the manufacturing function of the Qing palace office has the characteristic of "family and country duality". The unique features of the Qing palace office are the rich kinds of workshops and the types of skills. Therefore, it is the most concentrated handcraft exchange platform in Chinese history. And court art is the precious historical heritage left over by the Qing palace office.
【学位授予单位】:北京科技大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:J509.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张学渝;李晓岑;;清宫造办处成立若干问题新探[J];广西民族大学学报(自然科学版);2015年04期
2 毕传龙;;雍乾时期的手工技艺观念新视角——西方传教士与清宫珐琅作手工行业知识传承[J];创新;2015年03期
3 张丽;;清宫铜器制造考——以雍、乾二朝为例[J];故宫博物院院刊;2013年05期
4 杨勇;;造办处档案所见乾隆朝漆器刻款问题研究[J];中国国家博物馆馆刊;2013年06期
5 李芝安;;清代朝珠述论[J];中国国家博物馆馆刊;2013年06期
6 赵翰生;;《大元毡}工物记》所载毛纺织史料述[J];自然科学史研究;2013年02期
7 张秉旺;文举;;清代皇家御用“玻璃厂”的确切地址小考[J];东方收藏;2013年04期
8 朱晓艳;;由“苏州样、广东匠”引发的思考[J];社会科学论坛;2013年04期
9 刘潞;;从南怀仁到马国贤:康熙宫廷西洋版画之演变[J];故宫学刊;2013年01期
10 刘辉;;康熙朝洋画家:杰凡尼·热拉蒂尼——兼论康熙对西洋绘画之态度[J];故宫博物院院刊;2013年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 王和平;;康熙朝御用玻璃厂与西方传教士[A];中外关系史论文集第14辑——新视野下的中外关系史[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 李国荣;;清代官窑瓷器为何大量留存民间[N];中国档案报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 曹天成;郎世宁在华境遇及其所画瘦马研究[D];中央美术学院;2011年
2 刘虎;康雍乾三朝宫廷绘画研究[D];天津大学;2011年
3 熊Z,
本文编号:2121673
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2121673.html